ADVERTISEMENT

OOTB's Political Thread . ..

Let’s try this a different way.

Why would the uber wealthy, capitalist donor class support “socialist” candidates? Hard to imagine how they would benefit from policies/philosophy that is diametrically imposed to their interests.

There is nothing socialist about the Democratic Party. They conspired to rig two different primaries against Bernie and he isn’t nearly as far left as an actual socialist.

You dorks need to get off Facebook and stop eating up the boomer bait red scare bullshit.
and as I tried to point out, you need to not keep referring to classic Socialism in a stricter economic sense...notice the capital 'S'...for the sake of your argument, and deal with the term socialism...notice the small 's'......actually in play currently. I assume you're aware that language is dynamic and words and word usage transform over time. If not, maybe make yourself aware and then try again.

I almost choked at the suggestion that there's nothing socialist about the dem party. Just because they didn't take a giant step towards almost certain unelectability with Bernie doesn't mean that they aren't dragging us slowly and inexorably toward his way of thinking.

You dorks need to somehow be more than 17 years old so that you could actually have witnessed the steady shift over time in that direction....or better yet, just stop posting as if you only have the experience of a 17 y.o.
 
200w.gif
Sorry but your image is too small and I don't feel like squinting to read what it says. Have you still not figured out how to adjust the size of images you're posting?
😄
 
And I have explained countless times here that I''m not a gambler either. I get no enjoyment or thrill from placing bets. Hell, I don't even buy lottery tickets or have the desire to go to Vegas or even Harrod's three hours away in the mountains. And yet for the same reason that you're not a better I'm being accused of lacking gumption and confidence. Man, you're dumb.
it doesn't matter that you do or don't gamble, shithead. What matters is that YOU called someone for not having the gumption to do what YOU yourself wouldn't do, and then you offered a lame excuse for not doing it. Are you just completely stupid? You should have just said 'I don't gamble' and left it at that. But obviously, that would have left you exposed to an accusation of being too chickenshit to put your money where your mouth is (I shudder to think) and that's what you were trying to prevent by going on the offensive. Dude, you can be read like a book, like a reading primer.

See Heels Noir. See Heels Noir run. Run, Heels Noir, run. LMAO.


It's called irony, dumbass.
I guess it's just me but when I'm using irony to counter someone's point, I use something actually ironic and I make that ironic something relate to the original notion in a way that opposes or negates it.

Ukraine staging a counteroffensive now doesn't have any bearing on the fact that while Trump had a decent relationship with Putin, Putin wasn't invading Ukraine and accordingly, no counteroffensive would even be a reality. Your 'irony' is a complete miscue. And you call ME dumb? LOL.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Archer2
This thinking makes no sense to me. It didn't make sense when @blazers said it and it didn't make sense when @Heels Noir said it. And nothing you say ever makes sense, least of all, this repeated line.

You're without $100 from me today. If you bet me and you win and as you say, I refuse to pay up, you're still without my $100. Nothing changed. But you guys would have so much ammo for slandering the welshers on this board. Is that not worth at least something? Wouldn't you love to point out what a dirtbag @bluetoe is? Or me? C'mon now,...you should love that. I've been kicking you around this board for god knows how many years. This would be a chance for you to get some licks back? And it would be legitimate. It's odd that you, Blaze and HN would pass up that chance.

Unless of course y'all are just a bunch of pussies running your mouths who don't really feel all that good about Less Than 2% Kamala winning in November.
Anybody would be a fool to bet you. You have a history.
 
Reasonable fear, considering the 2008 debacle. Do you think we have enough protections in place against that? I fear we don't but I really don't know.

IIRC, Dodd-Frank was supposed to address some of those risks. But I believe parts of that were repealed or struck down. So if we had another bubble like that one, would we be any better prepared?
I don't know and that's why I was asking. I don't know what protections are in place and maybe more importantly, I don't know if there might be workarounds for someone inclined to use them. I just know I see someone trying to go off course in order to get lower income people in a home, and alarm bells start going off.
 
The big question is what are you guys going to do when Trump loses again? The GOP is like rats on a sinking ship and a lot of those rats are telling Trump to go to hell.
 
Or raise sufficient revenues to pay the bills.

What a concept.
oh no, not another 'more is better' deal. Why don't we reduce the size of the bills and not take away money that people would put into the economy, and fight inflation by NOT printing more money?. Why don't we let people keep as much of their money as possible instead of looking for ways to spend it for them. Otherwise, people will say we're trending toward socialism and @uncboy10 will have to go into denial again.
 
The big question is what are you going to do when Trump loses again? The GOP is like rats on a sinking ship and a lot of those rats are telling Trump to go to hell.
you might be right. I know at least one rat that does that.
 
oh no, not another 'more is better' deal. Why don't we reduce the size of the bills and not take away money that people would put into the economy, and fight inflation by NOT printing more money?. Why don't we let people keep as much of their money as possible instead of looking for ways to spend it for them. Otherwise, people will say we're trending toward socialism and @uncboy10 will have to go into denial again.

Lol your experience clearly hasn’t done you much good since you’re apparently still operating on an understanding of monetary policy that hasn’t been updated since we left the gold standard.
 
I delved into these not long ago and the upshot was that there were problems that made these reactors impractical. I hope the Chinese have solved the problems but I imagine that it is all still just experimental.

For any tl;dr type people, the video says that China has enough thorium to supply China's energy needs for 20,000 years. I would love to see us get off the petrotit for the most part, and nuclear power is a big part of that solution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: blazers
Lol your experience clearly hasn’t done you much good since you’re apparently still operating on an understanding of monetary policy that hasn’t been updated since we left the gold standard.
OK. You want to explain? Can I get an updated understanding that has no elements of socialism? Can you show me why my understanding doesn't relate to current practice? I'm all ears.
 
For those who believe every stupid word that comes out of Donald Trump's mouth, and that includes pretty much all of the uneducated cult members, tonight is the night that Joe Biden stages a comeback at the DNC to reclaim the nomination for president. Tomorrow's headlines will be scintillating!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: blazers
For those who believe every stupid word that comes out of Donald Trump's mouth, and that includes pretty much all of the uneducated cult members, tonight is the night that Joe Biden stages a comeback at the DNC to reclaim the nomination for president. Tomorrow's headlines will be scintillating!
more scintillating than your gasbag posts, I imagine.

If Biden really does stage a comeback, will they tell him or just put him back in the basement and keep him in the dark so he can work with Kamala 24/7 on that Gaza ceasefire deal?
 
If Biden really does stage a comeback, will they tell him or just put him back in the basement and keep him in the dark so he can work with Kamala 24/7 on that Gaza ceasefire deal?
You'll have to tune in and watch, as I'm sure you will.
 
Translation: I'm too stupid to figure it out so like a pregnant mother collecting welfare I'm reliant on others to assist me.

See. Thanks for proving my point. I poasted it how I wanted and you still responded. Like I said, poasters here adjust to me.
 
Here's a photograph taken Saturday during Donald Trump's rally in Wilkes-Barre, Pa. Where's the big crowd? Did everyone have to pee at the same time?

484e1ca5-ebb6-428e-8925-a6a809f7c21a.jpg


Likewise in Tulsa:
550d958440c871398904292c822a4bb96b-trump-tulsa.2x.rhorizontal.w700.jpg


And Orlando:
A3FHP2POGJG77BEGELCFL4NWZI.jpg
 
Last edited:
Here's a photograph taken Saturday during Donald Trump's rally in Wilkes-Barre, Pa. Where's the big crowd? Did everyone have to pee at the same time?

484e1ca5-ebb6-428e-8925-a6a809f7c21a.jpg


Likewise in Tulsa:
550d958440c871398904292c822a4bb96b-trump-tulsa.2x.rhorizontal.w700.jpg


And Orlando:
A3FHP2POGJG77BEGELCFL4NWZI.jpg
given the poster's tendencies, I suspect these pictures are taken out of context.
 
I suspect these pictures are taken out of context.
Nope. You suspect wrongly. Here's the rest of it since you refuse to believe in the truth:

1:59 p.m. EDT, August 17, 2024
Attack ads against Harris displayed inside arena where Trump will hold rally
484e1ca5-ebb6-428e-8925-a6a809f7c21a.jpg

People sit under a screen displaying text against Vice President Kamala Harris at a campaign rally for former President Donald Trump in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, on August 17.

🤣
 
Nope. You suspect wrongly. Here's the rest of it since you refuse to believe in the truth:

1:59 p.m. EDT, August 17, 2024
Attack ads against Harris displayed inside arena where Trump will hold rally
484e1ca5-ebb6-428e-8925-a6a809f7c21a.jpg

People sit under a screen displaying text against Vice President Kamala Harris at a campaign rally for former President Donald Trump in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, on August 17.

🤣
Hey el stupido, from your article: "ahead of former President Trump’s rally there on Saturday."

But the funny thing to your link was that it set out a series of articles from CNN. The very first one is about Comrade K beefing up her legal team. She hired Marc Elias. That's right, the Russian Hoaxer. Solid strategy right there.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Archer2 and bluetoe
Nope. You suspect wrongly. Here's the rest of it since you refuse to believe in the truth:

1:59 p.m. EDT, August 17, 2024
Attack ads against Harris displayed inside arena where Trump will hold rally
484e1ca5-ebb6-428e-8925-a6a809f7c21a.jpg

People sit under a screen displaying text against Vice President Kamala Harris at a campaign rally for former President Donald Trump in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, on August 17.

🤣
dude, sorry man but I'm having a hard time finding this 'rest of it' you referred to. All I see is the same OOC pic you posted before.

Is this it?

38f812de-a64a-4c5b-9bac-792165f9d9c6.jpg




Meanwhile, looks like dems are rushing in to grab a seat to see if Joe Biden sees his shadow.

557ccf80-c7a0-48ea-90a6-a17f8ea78af3.JPG
 
But the funny thing to your link was that it set out a series of articles from CNN. The very first one is about Comrade K beefing up her legal team. She hired Marc Elias. That's right, the Russian Hoaxer. Solid strategy right there.
Yea I wouldn’t be making fun of her campaign strategy if I were a trump supporter. She’s stomping a hole in his face right now. Y’all better be glad there’s only
Like 70 days left til election. At the rate Donnie’s cluster fuk of a campaign is rocketing her up the polls if it were any longer she’d be declared the winner an hour after the polls close.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Heels Noir
Make no mistake, a man who uses fraud, theft, and violence to take power will commit any crime to keep it.
- Rep. Jamie Raskin, 2024 Democratic National Convention
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT