ADVERTISEMENT

OOTB's Political Thread . ..

He just keeps with the snarky juvenile attacks. Meanwhile she had another bump in the polls overall with the convention coming up that will give her another. She’s gained like 7 pts since entering the race and for the first team leads nationally although within margin of error. How can he not know it’s not working? This might be the worst run campaign ever. I don’t know if he’s getting bad advice or just ignoring what he’s told. He smokes her on the economy and the border. But fuk that let’s mispronounce her name more. Lol. Dumass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gteeitup
He just keeps with the snarky juvenile attacks. Meanwhile she had another bump in the polls overall with the convention coming up that will give her another. She’s gained like 7 pts since entering the race and for the first team leads nationally although within margin of error. How can he not know it’s not working? This might be the worst run campaign ever. I don’t know if he’s getting bad advice or just ignoring what he’s told. He smokes her on the economy and the border. But fuk that let’s mispronounce her name more. Lol. Dumass.
Don't forget about him botching the bump from the assassination attempt. Could have rode that wave to the win. I think he's probably just getting bad advice because people are just telling him how great he is. A bunch of yes men and nobody to tell him what he needs to do. Still think it comes down to the debate, though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: heelmanwilm
all my hopes for the future of this country.
That sounds like you've wagered exactly ZERO dollars on Trump for the win. Where's your confidence? Where's your gumption?
🤣

There's not much la dolce vita for you these days, huh? X^D
 
Crazy with man love.
prompthero-prompt-b8506740fb6.png
 
That sounds like you've wagered exactly ZERO dollars on Trump for the win. Where's your confidence? Where's your gumption?
🤣

There's not much la dolce vita for you these days, huh? X^D

let's recap

Who needs to wager when life is this sweet? It appears I have everything I want. The question is, do you have the gumption to put money down on your boy with a bookie?

well it certainly seems he has the gumption that you lack. LOL at you dodging a bet you claim confidence in winning because....life is so sweet? Doesn't it embarrass you to post something that glaringly lame? Or is it a greater embarrassment you fear?

you accuse him of not having the gumption to place a bet when YOU don't have the gumption to take his bet, after crowing about your heroine's chances of winning. In other words, you're a hypocrite.

I have said nothing to anyone about betting and no one has asked me to bet, and I have no interest in doing so anyway. Gumption has nothing to do with it, but FWIW I have no particular confidence in either party winning, and I put little significance on polls or any other supposed predictors. If I did, I still wouldn't bet on something so meaningless....that is to say, the election isn't meaningless but a bet would be. All the pre-election back-and-forth about who is leading who is not my game and you will not find an example of me playing it.

Furthermore, you lay your cowardice off on your life being so sweet...one of the lamest dodges ever. I mean, you might as well have just said 'no thanks I'm just a pussy with a big mouth'. That would have been less shameful and less embarrassing to you than gumptionlessly telling someone they have no gumption to do what you have no gumption to do.

And just when it looks like you couldn't be any more lame, you sling me a butthurt loser spitball about la dolce vita. And you even throw in a little fruitcake keyboard emoji thing . LOL, I could almost hear you swishing.
 
let's recap





you accuse him of not having the gumption to place a bet when YOU don't have the gumption to take his bet, after crowing about your heroine's chances of winning. In other words, you're a hypocrite.

I have said nothing to anyone about betting and no one has asked me to bet, and I have no interest in doing so anyway. Gumption has nothing to do with it, but FWIW I have no particular confidence in either party winning, and I put little significance on polls or any other supposed predictors. If I did, I still wouldn't bet on something so meaningless....that is to say, the election isn't meaningless but a bet would be. All the pre-election back-and-forth about who is leading who is not my game and you will not find an example of me playing it.

Furthermore, you lay your cowardice off on your life being so sweet...one of the lamest dodges ever. I mean, you might as well have just said 'no thanks I'm just a pussy with a big mouth'. That would have been less shameful and less embarrassing to you than gumptionlessly telling someone they have no gumption to do what you have no gumption to do.

And just when it looks like you couldn't be any more lame, you sling me a butthurt loser spitball about la dolce vita. And you even throw in a little fruitcake keyboard emoji thing . LOL, I could almost hear you swishing.
Anybody would be a fool to bet you people, you're not known for paying your debts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Heels Noir
It always makes me chuckle when people accuse the democrats of being socialists.

You can tell they’re big scary leftists by the way they do private speaking tours for hedge funds and banks after they leave office lol
 
I think trump claiming he’s better looking than Harris is a game changer. I hear his campaign will start drawing dicks on Harris’ pics as well. Maybe they’ll use the same artist that drew that east coast hurricane cone extending into Alabama.

Donald Trump Sharpie GIF by GIPHY News
 
  • Haha
Reactions: gteeitup
Anybody would be a fool to bet you people, you're not known for paying your debts.
I just explained that I'm historically not interested in betting and you conclude that that makes me a risk for not paying off bets that I don't even make. Yes. you are a bright one.
 
It always makes me chuckle when people accuse the democrats of being socialists.

You can tell they’re big scary leftists by the way they do private speaking tours for hedge funds and banks after they leave office lol
who says they aren't hypocrite socialist whores? Not me.

And besides, we all know that that's how the payoff money for political favors is channeled. Who says they aren't crooks? Not me.
 
who says they aren't hypocrite socialist whores? Not me.

And besides, we all know that that's how the payoff money for political favors is channeled. Who says they aren't crooks? Not me.

So you think that a bunch of socialists are getting kickbacks from banks and hedge funds for political favors? Lol

When do you expect the workers seize the means of production?
 
  • Like
Reactions: tarheel0910
So you think that a bunch of socialists are getting kickbacks from banks and hedge funds for political favors? Lol

When do you expect the workers seize the means of production?



I like how when you purposely choose words like 'channeled' to make your meaning plain, it will be ignored by those who don't want it to be plain because in that way their off-target remarks might almost make sense.

I like when in an argument, some resort to outdated characterizations to bolster their POV.

I just like posts like the above because I can so easily point out the flaws.
 
Anybody would be a fool to bet you people, you're not known for paying your debts.

This thinking makes no sense to me. It didn't make sense when @blazers said it and it didn't make sense when @Heels Noir said it. And nothing you say ever makes sense, least of all, this repeated line.

You're without $100 from me today. If you bet me and you win and as you say, I refuse to pay up, you're still without my $100. Nothing changed. But you guys would have so much ammo for slandering the welshers on this board. Is that not worth at least something? Wouldn't you love to point out what a dirtbag @bluetoe is? Or me? C'mon now,...you should love that. I've been kicking you around this board for god knows how many years. This would be a chance for you to get some licks back? And it would be legitimate. It's odd that you, Blaze and HN would pass up that chance.

Unless of course y'all are just a bunch of pussies running your mouths who don't really feel all that good about Less Than 2% Kamala winning in November.
 
These anti-Israel protest in Chicago have the potential to bring gifts to Trump. Democratic lawmakers have been advised to use fake names at hotels and restaurants. Businesses are pre-emptively boarding up. Lol. If Trump was smart, he'd send in some goons to agitate the crowd and get things whooped up a little. See if we can get some violence on camera.
 
I like how when you purposely choose words like 'channeled' to make your meaning plain, it will be ignored by those who don't want it to be plain because in that way their off-target remarks might almost make sense.

I like when in an argument, some resort to outdated characterizations to bolster their POV.

I just like posts like the above because I can so easily point out the flaws.

Let’s try this a different way.

Why would the uber wealthy, capitalist donor class support “socialist” candidates? Hard to imagine how they would benefit from policies/philosophy that is diametrically imposed to their interests.

There is nothing socialist about the Democratic Party. They conspired to rig two different primaries against Bernie and he isn’t nearly as far left as an actual socialist.

You dorks need to get off Facebook and stop eating up the boomer bait red scare bullshit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tarheel0910
Let’s try this a different way.

Why would the uber wealthy, capitalist donor class support “socialist” candidates? Hard to imagine how they would benefit from policies/philosophy that is diametrically imposed to their interests.

There is nothing socialist about the Democratic Party. They conspired to rig two different primaries against Bernie and he isn’t nearly as far left as an actual socialist.

You dorks need to get off Facebook and stop eating up the boomer bait red scare bullshit.
It just helps to scare up the vote. It's kinda fun to watch. It's just as enjoyable from the other side too. I remember when Romney was being called a far right nut job when he was running against Obama. Politicians are good for a laugh, if nothing else.
 
I just explained that I'm historically not interested in betting and you conclude that that makes me a risk for not paying off bets that I don't even make.
And I have explained countless times here that I''m not a gambler either. I get no enjoyment or thrill from placing bets. Hell, I don't even buy lottery tickets or have the desire to go to Vegas or even Harrod's three hours away in the mountains. And yet for the same reason that you're not a better I'm being accused of lacking gumption and confidence. Man, you're dumb.
OK. Point?
It's called irony, dumbass.
 
You're without $100 from me today. If you bet me and you win and as you say, I refuse to pay up, you're still without my $100. Nothing changed.
I'm sure at some point you made this argument when Felonius Punk, a.k.a. UNC71-00, lost our wager and never paid up. The fact is, I'm not a welsher and I would have sent him the $100 I owed him had he won the bet. So in that case, yes, something would have changed . . . I would have been out of a hundred bucks.

Of course, knowing that Donald Trump lost that election in a landslide made me forget about it pretty quickly. And again, in a few months when Kamala kicks his ass, bragging rights are all I really need.
 
Last edited:
And I have explained countless times here that I''m not a gambler either. I get no enjoyment or thrill from placing bets. Hell, I don't even buy lottery tickets or have the desire to go to Vegas or even Harrod's three hours away in the mountains. And yet for the same reason that you're not a better I'm being accused of lacking gumption and confidence. Man, you're dumb.

It's called irony, dumbass.


200w.gif
 
I fear loan-qualifying being tinkered with again, given the bent of the socialist candidate.
Reasonable fear, considering the 2008 debacle. Do you think we have enough protections in place against that? I fear we don't but I really don't know.

IIRC, Dodd-Frank was supposed to address some of those risks. But I believe parts of that were repealed or struck down. So if we had another bubble like that one, would we be any better prepared?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT