Do you guys understand how petty you sound?
Petty enough to hide a us navy ship cause its named after a dead political
Rival?
Do you guys understand how petty you sound?
Yep. Conservatives are really getting the shaft. That's why people like Jordan Peterson and Dave Rubin are raking in the cash on youtube, and leveraging it into speaking tours that are even more lucrative. Prager University ads are all over pretty much every social media platform...
The majority of the "pundits" who have been banned from social media are obnoxious edge lords that say stupid shit then whine when there's backlash. People like Sargon of Akaad and Milo are immature, arrogant shitposters that love getting themselves banned so that they can drum up a bunch of financial support on Patreon for basically doing nothing. Then a bunch of wannabe pseudo-intellectuals that think being conservative is some kind of counter-culture movement, eat that shit up and regurgitate it all over the internet.
Petty enough to hide a us navy ship cause its named after a dead political
Rival?
Yeah, you sound that petty. Congrats on becoming the "Donald Trump" of OOTB!
Yep. Conservatives are really getting the shaft. That's why people like Jordan Peterson and Dave Rubin are raking in the cash on youtube, and leveraging it into speaking tours that are even more lucrative. Prager University ads are all over pretty much every social media platform...
The majority of the "pundits" who have been banned from social media are obnoxious edge lords that say stupid shit then whine when there's backlash. People like Sargon of Akaad and Milo are immature, arrogant shitposters that love getting themselves banned so that they can drum up a bunch of financial support on Patreon for basically doing nothing. Then a bunch of wannabe pseudo-intellectuals that think being conservative is some kind of counter-culture movement, eat that shit up and regurgitate it all over the internet.
Yepp and thats why neither of us should ever be potus
Yes, it's called ignore.Can there be a rule where you can't account for more than half of the posts on an entire thread page?
Can there be a rule where you can't account for more than half of the posts on an entire thread page?
I've never thought about that.Can there be a rule where you can't account for more than half of the posts on an entire thread page?
Not sure how this dude would handle it...Can there be a rule where you can't account for more than half of the posts on an entire thread page?
To see if I can get half of the posts.
Not sure how this dude would handle it...
Daily Scripture
who are these posters you’re replying to?Sure, I could start a thread for each post. All I'm doing is responding to people, who responded to me, and posting some articles that I find relevant. Why are you so butthurt over this?
.
who are these posters you’re replying to?
Sure, I could start a thread for each post. All I'm doing is responding to people, who responded to me, and posting some articles that I find relevant. Why are you so butthurt over this?
Your definition of relevant is suspect.
The real story is that we are the laughingstock of the entire world.I'm sorry. Should I go all CNN and start talking about Trump's penis?
The real story is that we are the laughingstock of the entire world.
The real story is that we are the laughingstock of the entire world.
Our President is, we aren't.
Most countries are smart enough to know that a majority of the US population didn't vote for him.
I don't even believe that's true. A lot of world leaders don't like him because they're globalists and he's doing what is best for the US. I get that, but it doesn't mean they think he's a laughing stock. They just hate him like they hate Farage, Salvini, and Orban.
I don't agree with that. I think they think he isn't worthy of being the leader of the most important country in the world...and they are correct.
What's also funny about Trump...he claims some landslide victory in 2016...he lost the popular vote and only 2 times since 1980 has a President received a lower % of the electoral vote (Bush both times). Guy is a freaking joke.
He's doing what he thinks is best for Donald Trump.I don't even believe that's true. A lot of world leaders don't like him because they're globalists and he's doing what is best for the US. I get that, but it doesn't mean they think he's a laughing stock. They just hate him like they hate Farage, Salvini, and Orban.
Trump just declared reports of protests against him in london as fake news.
The protests are in plain sight from the press bldg where trump was being interviewed.
We have a new “baghdad bob” it seems.
What a ****ing idiot
He's doing what he thinks is best for Donald Trump.
Link?
What exactly is a "globalist" again? I keep forgetting.But they think that because he flies against everything they believe in. They believe that world leaders should be globalists. They're scared because this neo-liberal globalist agenda is imploding before their very eyes, and even though Trump didn't start it (BREXIT and Farage did), Trump is the most recognizable anti-globalist due to his position. Just look at what the leaders say about him. Most of them don't attack his intellect, they try to misrepresent his position. Most of the "you're stupid" attacks come from insipid Twitterati like Hollywood, or some equally inept Joe Schmoe on the street who don't understand the issues.
Derp...Who cares who he's doing it for? What matter is what he is doing.
Trump calls protests "fake news"Link?
They're all just upset because Trump is not a neo-classical liberal globalist... I think.Here are the protests:
https://abcnews.go.com/International/trump-baby-blimp-takes-sky-mass-protests-us/story?id=63470637
Here's Trump saying if they find them it's "fake news"
What a clown.
What exactly is a "globalist" again? I keep forgetting.