OOTB's Political Thread . ..
- Thread starter BillyL
- Start date
I’m not taking food out of your family’s mouth, assuming you would even pay up. I’ve told you before, go get the attention you crave from someone else. You were born a loser and you will die one.
Last edited:
When you factor in a sitting President that lost the popular vote by 3 million to a candidate that was extremely unpopular in her own right and the President is now seemingly more unpopular 4 years later according to polling data it's hard to find worse. Biden actually helps the 3 of them in terms of being super duper qualified for the job on paper - he's just awful and probably getting worse by the day. So this one would probably be my runner up. They still have two more debates to get my top spot but it's gonna be tough...
Because 1852-1856 was an absolute shitshow. In 1852, you had Fillmore, the sitting President, lose his party's nomination then the guy he lost to get demolished by Franklin Pierce who wasn't even on his own party's ballot until the 35th go round in the nomination. Pierce filled his cabinet with supporters of his rival in the party, James Buchanan, who went on to win in 1856 and become our worst President ever. Pierce spent his 4 years in office drinking everything in Washington DC he could find and then didn't run in 1856 when we elected the worst President ever.
Oh and as another compromise to Buchanan, Pierce's VP was Rufus King, who was James Buchanan's gay lover (NTTAWWT) who contracted TB while in a gay brothel in Paris and died right after the nomination. This all actually happened.
So yeah, I'll give the 2016-2020 crew a runner up off the top of my head.
Last edited:
I hope the next two debates will give the moderator a way to turn the mikes off when their two minutes are up. Hell, put them in separate rooms and video their answers. Anything but the shit show how we saw last night.
"...so it's all or nothing with you."
OF COURSE IT IS. We are choosing one side of the coin or the other. We have chosen the side we want, and you're wasting your time trying to get us to get all bent out of shape over how poorly polished our side is. We don't give a shit.
If you want real discussion, try telling us how our choice will be bad for the country while the other side will be better. That would be a welcome paradigm shift.
You have already said to not waste our time, what would we want to discuss with you?
the coin Has “lose” stamped on both sides. We’re sick of y’all insisting otherwise.
while I completely acknowledge your expertise on being clowned, I still struggle with a white supremacist group that is run by a black guy.
you have 3 options:
1) accept that you are losing and nothing will ever change
2) change your point of view so you believe you are winning.
3) don’t play
I spelled it out clearly enough in my post that a five year old could understand, so I see why you're having a problem with it.
What you're actually saying is what I already know...you have nothing of substance to talk about; all you have to offer is your idiotic ongoing character assassination...which is exactly what I said to stop wasting our time with.
BTW, have I told you lately that you're a moron?
maybe so, but only the brainless refuse to recognize that one side is going to be chosen. How do you not understand how meaningless and vapid your 'both sides' posting habit is. You're like a parrot with only one line. Want a cracker?
The two party system has never proved to be more of a failure. I would love for people to wake up and demand a third party. The desire is there, voters are just too afraid to demand it, or should I say too lazy to do it.
I wish our first and maybe greatest President warned us this would happen...oh wait, he did.
Trump responded just as I hoped he would. The relentless one-sided push toward the left has to be countered, and having a trap question sprung on you and then unfairly hammered deserves exactly the kind of answer Trump gave. How fvcked up is it that the moderator refuses to let the President answer his question without trying to force him into a corner.
Wallace tries to argue that Antifa is just an idea, while 'white supremacy' must refer to a group...yet he won't name that group. I'm pretty sure there isn't a group called the 'White Supremes'. Maybe I'm wrong.
But the bigger point is that this is America, where you're supposed to be able to think and say any insane, crazy thing you want, as long as you don't trample on another person's rights. I haven't seen white supremacists starting riots and attacking those who oppose them philosophically. But Antifa and their ilk damn sure has. Where was the pressing question about them? The President has no business condemning groups that are acting lawfully. He does have a responsibility to condemn and act against those who don't. But the left turns their heads to lawbreaking when they're the ones doing it.
Instead of your non stop incessant bitching and whining, why don't you start the 3rd party movement? Or are you too lazy to do it?
It was like watching dook vs $tate b-ball game that goes into triple overtime with both teams shooting 12% and ends in a brawl with both teams forfeiting.
Anonymous sourcing is frowned upon unless it's absolutely necessary to tell the story. But textbook journalistic practices aren't really followed these days
that would be extraordinarily entertaining. I would DVR that and watch it weekly until the day I die.
guilty. I really dgaf anymore. I was determined to vote for one or the other but last night changed that. So maybe that’s “doing something about it”. I dont know. The system seems to be self destructing just fine on its own anyway.
This little angry rant here reminds me of the scene from Idiocracy where Justin Long makes fun of Luke Wilson for speaking intelligently. After watching last night's debate, seems like we're not too far off.
What's phony though?
I don't think most of us "moderates" have indicated that we know how to fix anything. I know it's shit and I know we're way too far down this rabbit hole to dig ourselves out. Presidential elections have been a battle of the lesser of two evils in like 90% of the elections since Monroe. I've never really claimed to care all that much anyway so you using "you don't care" as an attack is weird, I never said anything differently.
So if that's phony to you, then ok.
Feelings are mutual.
This is literally all you poast. You just call out when you think someone is mad or whining because they don't agree with your feelings about Trump. Yet I'm the one who is devolving? Right.
Unless you have some other equally shitty alias, your join date says July 17th, 2018.
I read the first sentence. He responded by not alienating the people he knows will always have his back. I just hope the next two debates reveal even more severe/extreme levels of it. Alienating everyone except for his cult will be ideal.
The message both campaigns have for their candidate should be the same in preparation for the next debate "Say as little as possible, your opponent is a bozo and will bury himself if you give him the chance".
Trump should just ask to rub Biden's hairy legs in the next debate.
I'm seriously considering this:
2018 Gibson Custom Shop Historic Les Paul 1959 Reissue - musical...
Title says it all. Guitar sounds amazing and plays flawlessly. Honey Lemon Fade VOS finish....
asheville.craigslist.org
Did they stifle the Proud Boys from reacting publicly? I hope not. I think it's great that the debate allowed Trump to secure the Proud Boys' votes... and undying support!
