Oh no! Someone found your very public social media profile @uncboy10? What are you going to do now? You must feel so violated.
1- maybe he meant because Bush was rolling over and a lame duck. Or maybe he meant to say 2009. But are you really going to call this a “lie”?
2. If you are going to bust his balls for saying 2008, then you can’t for 2011, which is when the new Congress came in. This is absurdly inconsistent and the tweet is falling apart.
3. No idea when legislation began on Daca, nor do I care.
4. He is your president so suck on deez nutz.
Maybe he...He claims dems willingly chose to do nothing about daca when they controlled all three branches of the govt. And since they’re critical of it now the implication is that they’re being hypocritical. Yet they never controlled all three branches when daca existed so that would make him a liar. I despise dem leadership as much as repub but i’m not gonna lie about either. Yes hes my president and yours. And hes a proven liar thousands of times over. So seems you’re sucking heez nutz.
71 is a little preoccupied with nuts and people sucking them.
I'm just tired of listening to him cry about it. It isn't like anyone hunted him down. He posted his information on a message board. I don't know why you would ever do that. Shit, my buddy was on Facebook (I think, it could have been Twitter) and a bunch of leftists were threatening to Doxx him and call his work, the whole nine yards, just because he didn't believe in open immigration. He wasn't even being a dick about it. The left and the never-Trumpers started this whole mess, and now they want to cry when it happens to them. Remember how much they cried when that Sleeping Giants A-hole got doxxed?
https://dailycaller.com/2018/07/16/sleeping-giants-founder-rivitz/
See, this is what I was talking about. I'm not taking either side of this issue, but you should've known better, dude.
Oh no! Someone found your very public social media profile @uncboy10? What are you going to do now? You must feel so violated.
This is the most ridiculous take in the history of this board.
You saying that's the most ridiculous take in the history of this board is the most ridiculous take in the history of this board.
This is the most ridiculous take in the history of this board. I have never condoned "doxxing" anyone or seeking out someone's public profiles. So lay off the moronic 'guilt by association' arguments.
I posted an email address so that people could PayPal me money from a contest. It's pretty weird to take that and search for someone's social media profiles. Only a complete loser would do something like that.
What exactly is "a leftist" again?You realize there is a messaging system on this board, right? The rest of your post really doesn't have anything to do with what we're talking about. Whether you like it or not, it's a reality nowadays. A reality that the leftists started.
What exactly is "a leftist" again?
Thank you...A fascist who hides behind PC culture and virtue signalling.
The New Oxford American dictionary is an instrument of leftist propaganda.fascism - an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.
source: New Oxford American Dictionary
fascism - an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.
source: New Oxford American Dictionary
Thank you...
A fascist is a leftist...
So many "ist's" to sort out and keep track. I'm glad you're here to drive the bus.
This virtue signalling thing... I have to assume that is "bad" when you think someone is doing it. Because, what it is actually happening- when it supposedly happens- is hardly a threat to society. If you're trying to score social points, or just doing something because it's the right thing to do. That's left up to those who weren't there, and have done nothing, to decide, I guess.
The New Oxford American dictionary is an instrument of leftist propaganda.
So, authoritarianism never emanates from "the right"... only "the left?"You can change the word "fascism" to authoritarian if you wish. It doesn't change what the left really is nowadays. This is why I laugh when Democrats call themselves "liberals". They're on the opposite end of the spectrum at this point.
Edit: Also remember that Democrat politicians used to advocate for Jim Crow laws and were leaders in the KKK, so just remember that movements change.
So, authoritarianism never emanates from "the right"... only "the left?"
I'm about to have a movement, shortly. That coffee is kicking-in.Movements change, brutha.
But, you only seem concerned with "the left" from your participation here. Are you bullshitting me, yourself, everyone else, or all three?Oh, absolutely not. We get it from both sides.
I'm about to have a movement, shortly. That coffee is kicking-in.
But, you only seem concerned with "the left" from your participation here. Are you bullshitting me, yourself, everyone else, or all three?
Ahhhhh... okay. It sounds "classic."Because they're the main perpetrators at this point in time. The same people who call Trump an authoritarian are the ones who are attempting to perpetuate authoritarianism. It's a classic misdirection play.
Ahhhhh... okay. It sounds "classic."
"The Right" is taking a break. They work in shifts?
Don't ask me. They're characters in your story, not mine.I don't know. What are they currently doing that would qualify?
I'll do my own fixing, thank you.
I don't care what you suggest.Might I suggest you start with your political path?
I don't care what you suggest.
Pretty much anyone with a drop of common sense knows the parties flipped sides. The “Dixiecrats” who supported Jim Crow weren’t leftists by any stretch of the imagination.
I’m guessing he’s a big fan of the total idiot dinesh D’Souza
No, I don't listen to D'Souza. The fact that you think the parties could change back then, but not now is pretty telling. They can only change when it's convenient to your argument?
No, I meant, you're free to suggest anything. Suggestions are welcome.Dude, it was a joke. Light up, buddy.
Would you agree that Strom Thurmond was on the fascist-y side?No, I don't listen to D'Souza. The fact that you think the parties could change back then, but not now is pretty telling. They can only change when it's convenient to your argument?
Sure it does. If it was a private profile, and someone got content from it without your invitation, that would be more "creepy". What you are describing is only "creepy" to teenage girls and certainly less "creepy" than what I described.An account being public doesn't make it any less creepy for someone to look up that account. Thanks for the free publicity though. Be sure to drop a few likes while you're there.
Sure it does. If it was a private profile, and someone got content from it without your invitation, that would be more "creepy". What you are describing is only "creepy" to teenage girls and certainly less "creepy" than what I described.
That said, I wouldn't spend time on your social media pages without asking you to pay me back for my time. So that's a no thanks for me.