Would you agree that Strom Thurmond was on the fascist-y side?
I've never paid attention to Strom, personally. However, I wouldn't doubt it. A lot of the Republicans are. That's how we got legislation like The Patriot Act.
Would you agree that Strom Thurmond was on the fascist-y side?
No, I meant, you're free to suggest anything. Suggestions are welcome.
You are one seriously incohesive person. I never said anything about the parties not being able to change sides today. If a “leftist” is a fascist, then by definition they aren’t really a leftist.
If anything I've said is incoherent, it's probably because you haven't been keeping up. Political movements change, that's no secret. Case in point, Hillary is technically more fascist than Trump, since Fascism is really the combination of government and the private sector. It's basically what would be called corporatism nowadays or would have been called mercantilism in the past.
Fascism is really the combination of government and the private sector.
Pretty much everything in this post is wrong.
Trump is the embodiment of "the private sector and the government."If anything I've said is incoherent, it's probably because you haven't been keeping up. Political movements change, that's no secret. Case in point, Hillary is technically more fascist than Trump, since Fascism is really the combination of government and the private sector. It's basically what would be called corporatism nowadays or would have been called mercantilism in the past.
I'm curious for a further explanation on this one.
Not saying I don't agree, just haven't really thought about it until you said that.
Trump is the embodiment of "the private sector and the government."
I think the way Frenchmen measured was not inches or cm, so when he died, he was listed at 5'2" The myth grew from there. The average height of a french male in the period was 5'5'' and Napoleon was actually about 5'7''.I don't know if this comment is aimed at me or not. I mean, I'm not @ticket2ride04 height but I'm also several inches taller than Napoleon was.
But that brings me to a thought. Why is the complex called "Napoleon complex"? He was 5'6"-5'7", which back in that day, was probably taller than the average man. I would understand if it were called the "Toulouse Lautrec complex". That would make sense.
I think the way Frenchmen measured was not inches or cm, so when he died, he was listed at 5'2" The myth grew from there. The average height of a french male in the period was 5'5'' and Napoleon was actually about 5'7''.
Also, Napoleon has kind of been semi-villanized by many, especially in America. But the dude was fighting to overthrow Tyranny in Europe. He wanted to depose the Monarchies (albeit installing his own people) but believed in a man earning is way in the world, not being gifted it.
Finally, he was a bad ass tactician and probably one of the 10 greatest generals in the history of the world. What he did with artillery and psychological warfare was damned impressive.
I just don't find you to be a sympathetic victim I guess.It’s creepy regardless. But more than anything, it’s just sad. Only a pathetic loser with an unchecked napoleon complex could get this obsessed with a message board poster.
He's held an elected office for two years. He has been a "politician" his whole life. By politician, I mean shyster.How so? He's been a politician for two years, and he obviously hasn't seen eye to eye with the banks or the general way the US conducts business.
I just don't find you to be a sympathetic victim I guess.
He claims dems willingly chose to do nothing about daca when they controlled all three branches of the govt. And since they’re critical of it now the implication is that they’re being hypocritical. Yet they never controlled all three branches when daca existed so that would make him a liar. I despise dem leadership as much as repub but i’m not gonna lie about either. Yes hes my president and yours. And hes a proven liar thousands of times over. So seems you’re sucking heez nutz.
He's held an elected office for two years. He has been a "politician" his whole life. By politician, I mean shyster.
71 is a little preoccupied with nuts and people sucking them.
I don't know if this comment is aimed at me or not. I mean, I'm not @ticket2ride04 height but I'm also several inches taller than Napoleon was.
But that brings me to a thought. Why is the complex called "Napoleon complex"? He was 5'6"-5'7", which back in that day, was probably taller than the average man. I would understand if it were called the "Toulouse Lautrec complex". That would make sense.
No, it's not the same argument. And, even if it were the same argument? It's still the behavior of a shyster. He's been fvcking people over his entire life. He revels in it. He attracts other shysters to be complicit in his cons. The guy is crooked, so he fits right in with DC politics. He's DC politics on steroids. Please don't imply that Donald Trump is some virtuous outsider... he ain't.You can't blame the guy for playing the game that he has no control over. This is the same type of argument that people made against Ron Paul's smaller government argument when they cried about how his district took more tax dollars than it sent. RP had no control over that. The rules of the game had already been established. He couldn't change them on his own. It was his job to take care of his constituents to the best of his ability and he did that.
No, it's not the same argument. And, even if it were the same argument? It's still the behavior of a shyster. He's been fvcking people over his entire life. He revels in it. He attracts other shysters to be complicit in his cons. The guy is crooked, so he fits right in with DC politics. He's DC politics on steroids. Please don't imply that Donald Trump is some virtuous outsider... he ain't.
No, it's not. Donald Trump is a bullshitter par excellence! He thrives on his ability to be a shyster. He has made a brand out of being a fraud.I didn't say he was a moral human being, but it is the same argument.
You realize there is a messaging system on this board, right? The rest of your post really doesn't have anything to do with what we're talking about. Whether you like it or not, it's a reality nowadays. A reality that the leftists started.
DACA came into existence in 2012 because the Dems couldn't get anything passed prior to that. I don't know why this is so difficult to understand.
This is why I laugh when Democrats call themselves "liberals". They're on the opposite end of the spectrum at this point.
You can't wear it out.Dang man he said dems chose not to do anything about daca when they controlled all branches when actually they didnt control all branches and daca didnt even exist in the years mentioned. Smh. Why is that so difficult to understand? Is this one of those “yea he said this but he ACTUALLY meant that” things again?
Y’all are wearing that one da fuq out.
Lulz at Trump cancelling Pelosi's overseas trip!
If anything I've said is incoherent, it's probably because you haven't been keeping up. Political movements change, that's no secret. Case in point, Hillary is technically more fascist than Trump, since Fascism is really the combination of government and the private sector. It's basically what would be called corporatism nowadays or would have been called mercantilism in the past.
No, it's not. Donald Trump is a bullshitter par excellence! He thrives on his ability to be a shyster. He has made a brand out of being a fraud.
Ron Paul's decision to get as much money as he could from the corrupt, broken system is also not one of his finer qualities and one of the more hypocritical aspects of his legacy. But, keep up that equivalent to make you feel warm about Trump's swampy card.
I would disagree. With both your point, and your re-definition of fascism. Who do you think you are, J Peterson?
CC
I wish I were that smart.
He is certainly smart and an amazing speaker. It's just his message is crap.
CC
I disagree, but that was probably obvious from your initial post.
No reason to doubt Cohen, he's obviously never lied........oh wait.This stuff is getting too funny.
No reason to doubt Cohen, he's obviously never lied........oh wait.
You also don't have to play the game. He loves the rules or he wouldn't be playing the game.You can scream it all you want, but you don't have to agree with the rules to play the game.
Dang man he said dems chose not to do anything about daca when they controlled all branches when actually they didnt control all branches and daca didnt even exist in the years mentioned. Smh. Why is that so difficult to understand? Is this one of those “yea he said this but he ACTUALLY meant that” things again?
Y’all are wearing that one da fuq out.
You also don't have to play the game. He loves the rules or he wouldn't be playing the game.