ADVERTISEMENT

OOTB's Political Thread . ..

Lol. Keep her alive long enough to perform the abortion? Wow. Hadn't thought of that. If a baby dies, goddamit, they want it to be them that killed it.
sure, cause that makes it 'aight'. You don't want to take a chance on the kid surviving, and everybody gets paid.
 
Is this another in a long list of things Trump was right about but the MSM has ignored?
seems so to me. The lefties will note that Biden was the President who
took the money, but that's what Biden is...the guy who takes the money. Trump is who said the Metzicans would pony up and by God he was right.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Archer2

I’m old enough to remember a time when people got to hug only the people they wanted to hug.

Also, it’s a big nothingburger as the person in the suit has already come forward and said she was motioning “no” to someone else asking them to hold their child for a photo. And the park officials came out with a statement saying those costumes often obstruct a downward view so it’s likely the person in the costume didn’t even see the two girls.

But this totally seems like something the left would meltdown over. Don’t. Ever. Change.
 
I’m old enough to remember a time when people got to hug only the people they wanted to hug.

Also, it’s a big nothingburger as the person in the suit has already come forward and said she was motioning “no” to someone else asking them to hold their child for a photo. And the park officials came out with a statement saying those costumes often obstruct a downward view so it’s likely the person in the costume didn’t even see the two girls.

But this totally seems like something the left would meltdown over. Don’t. Ever. Change.
yeah, totally not something worth getting bent out of shape over…how about just not responding if it’s no biggie?

knowing the context, i just thought it was funny.
 
I’m old enough to remember a time when people got to hug only the people they wanted to hug.

Also, it’s a big nothingburger as the person in the suit has already come forward and said she was motioning “no” to someone else asking them to hold their child for a photo. And the park officials came out with a statement saying those costumes often obstruct a downward view so it’s likely the person in the costume didn’t even see the two girls.

But this totally seems like something the left would meltdown over. Don’t. Ever. Change.
insidious systemic racism rears its ugly head and leaves two little girls heartbroken and scarred for life because slavery.

Seriously though, I feel bad for the little girls because they think those eyes are the real ones and there's no way they couldn't take what happened personally. And how do you explain it to them without destroying their innocence. Maybe it's just time to let them know that things are not always what they seem to be. Like democrats.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uncfootball-
Remember when the left lost its mind over Trump’s bible photo op? Lulz.

She takes a few steps and raises her fist in the air. How is she faking handcuffs if she raises her fist in the air while the other is behind her back.
 
She takes a few steps and raises her fist in the air. How is she faking handcuffs if she raises her fist in the air while the other is behind her back.
dumb-huh.gif
 
How long until Jim Harbaugh is out of a job? I'll set the over/under at 10 days. What are you taking @Hark_The_Sound_2010 ?

Not the best town to be saying that in. They'll dig up some fireable offense on him in the next week
 
These chinese folks must've gotten lost while following Hunter's laptop to the big guy Joe.
"A spokeswoman and a lawyer for Trump, who was not accused of wrongdoing, did not reply to requests for comment."
 

So is the solution to suspend some white kids that did nothing wrong to even out the numbers?

To answer your question, no, they do not see the solution as suspending white kids for no reason just to make the numbers look less disproportionate. They see the solution as NOT suspending the black kids even when it’s merited. The thing about these numbers is that these are even with teachers and administrators being reluctant to suspend the black kids for fear of the blowback.

For 25 years, I have worked in public ed or in partnership with public ed. I have seen it with my own eyes. My sister taught public school for 20 years. My mom taught public school for 40+ years. I feel pretty comfortable in my opinion that has been based on all the above experience in this area.

Part of the discrepancy can be attributed to socio-economic conditions, for sure. Part of it can be attributed to parents’ education levels. Parents who faired well in school are more likely to instill the same in their children. However, neither of those are the biggest factor. The biggest factor here is the culture. Whereas white families instill a sense of remorse with their children when caught breaking rules, blacks are much more likely to teach (probably more “role model” than actually instruct) their kids to resist authority. We see this in interactions with law enforcement. Same thing here. There’s an element of “street cred” when blacks buck the system. BecAuse they’ve been told the system is inherently racist or oppressive and therefore to resist it is righteous. For example, both a white kid and black kid put a tack in a teacher’s chair. Once caught, the white kid will sob and say how sorry he is (even if that’s not the case) and how he needs to do better in making good decisions. A black kid may indicate no remorse and even heighten the tension by saying “f*ck that bitch anyway.” It’s easy to see how an administrator would view the remorse from the white kid (even if not real) versus the anger (maybe even justified) from the black kid and how those differences would play a part in the level of consequences.

As to the article, what a piece of trash that was. Why write an article if you’re too lazy to actually look into the reasons for each groups’ suspensions? Because they can insinuate that blacks are being treated unfairly when most likely, that’s not the case. From my experience, blacks suspensions are more likely to be for violent acts/threats whereas white kids are more likely to be suspended for cheating or other non-violent behavior. Neither are good but only one compromises the safety and the ability to learn for other students.

Author Colin Flaherty (RIP) examined this kind of stuff in his books titled “Don’t Make The Black Kids Angry” and “White Girl Bleed A Lot” if you want to learn more.

yeah, yeah, tl;dr
 
To answer your question, no, they do not see the solution as suspending white kids for no reason just to make the numbers look less disproportionate. They see the solution as NOT suspending the black kids even when it’s merited. The thing about these numbers is that these are even with teachers and administrators being reluctant to suspend the black kids for fear of the blowback.

For 25 years, I have worked in public ed or in partnership with public ed. I have seen it with my own eyes. My sister taught public school for 20 years. My mom taught public school for 40+ years. I feel pretty comfortable in my opinion that has been based on all the above experience in this area.

Part of the discrepancy can be attributed to socio-economic conditions, for sure. Part of it can be attributed to parents’ education levels. Parents who faired well in school are more likely to instill the same in their children. However, neither of those are the biggest factor. The biggest factor here is the culture. Whereas white families instill a sense of remorse with their children when caught breaking rules, blacks are much more likely to teach (probably more “role model” than actually instruct) their kids to resist authority. We see this in interactions with law enforcement. Same thing here. There’s an element of “street cred” when blacks buck the system. BecAuse they’ve been told the system is inherently racist or oppressive and therefore to resist it is righteous. For example, both a white kid and black kid put a tack in a teacher’s chair. Once caught, the white kid will sob and say how sorry he is (even if that’s not the case) and how he needs to do better in making good decisions. A black kid may indicate no remorse and even heighten the tension by saying “f*ck that bitch anyway.” It’s easy to see how an administrator would view the remorse from the white kid (even if not real) versus the anger (maybe even justified) from the black kid and how those differences would play a part in the level of consequences.

As to the article, what a piece of trash that was. Why write an article if you’re too lazy to actually look into the reasons for each groups’ suspensions? Because they can insinuate that blacks are being treated unfairly when most likely, that’s not the case. From my experience, blacks suspensions are more likely to be for violent acts/threats whereas white kids are more likely to be suspended for cheating or other non-violent behavior. Neither are good but only one compromises the safety and the ability to learn for other students.

Author Colin Flaherty (RIP) examined this kind of stuff in his books titled “Don’t Make The Black Kids Angry” and “White Girl Bleed A Lot” if you want to learn more.

yeah, yeah, tl;dr

The mainstream media will fall all over itself to keep from pointing out the actual problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archer2 and bluetoe
100% agree with GSD. In my experience, black kids are more likely to rebel at authority. Ive been around it too long not to take notice.

Another factor that no one want to seem to bring up is fatherless homes. The overwhelming black boys I've had problems with came from single mom homes. Its sad because its a catch 22. Same thing over and over and nothing changes. Money thrown at the problem, doesnt help. Study after study after study and same BS comes up but the real issue is never addressed. Worthless MF's continuing to get women pregnant over and over and never face consequences. We always hear about women that have child after child but rarely about these sorry ass men.

In the black community, a male aint a man until he impregnates a girl. Its a passage in to manhood. Dont matter if the girl or child is taken care of, as long as he gets his respect. These boys dont know its wrong because its all they've seen all their lives.

We have no way of controlling it, unfortunately.

Now, lets imagine of some of these girls dont get to have an abortion and now we have even more ghetto bastards. This is my dilemma when it comes to abortion.

ETA. Schools have to follow certain rules regarding suspensions. Its not like a principal can decided on a whim who to suspend and not suspend. They have to follow protocol to suspend students. What the article also fails to address is what are the previous writeups, warnings, parent/teacher/administrative meetings to address the problem, etc. Do these suspensions include In School Suspension?

A lot of information left out of this article but it had to be. No one is interested in the truth.
 
Last edited:
100% agree with GSD. In my experience, black kids are more likely to rebel at authority. Ive been around it too long not to take notice.

Another factor that no one want to seem to bring up is fatherless homes. The overwhelming black boys I've had problems with came from single mom homes. Its sad because its a catch 22. Same thing over and over and nothing changes. Money thrown at the problem, doesnt help. Study after study after study and same BS comes up but the real issue is never addressed. Worthless MF's continuing to get women pregnant over and over and never face consequences. We always hear about women that have child after child but rarely about these sorry ass men.

In the black community, a male aint a man until he impregnates a girl. Its a passage in to manhood. Dont matter if the girl or child is taken care of, as long as he gets his respect. These boys dont know its wrong because its all they've seen all their lives.

We have no way of controlling it, unfortunately.

Now, lets imagine of some of these girls dont get to have an abortion and now we have even more ghetto bastards. This is my dilemma when it comes to abortion.

ETA. Schools have to follow certain rules regarding suspensions. Its not like a principal can decided on a whim who to suspend and not suspend. They have to follow protocol to suspend students. What the article also fails to address is what are the previous writeups, warnings, parent/teacher/administrative meetings to address the problem, etc. Do these suspensions include In School Suspension?

A lot of information left out of this article but it had to be. No one is interested in the truth.
Good thing you illuminated the "real issue." Maybe the Roe v. Wade ruling can be amended to make sure that abortions can be allowed for potential "ghetto bastards."

You actually thought all of this in your mind, then decided, "hey! I think I'll type it all out for posterity!"
 
Good thing you illuminated the "real issue." Maybe the Roe v. Wade ruling can be amended to make sure that abortions can be allowed for potential "ghetto bastards."

You actually thought all of this in your mind, then decided, "hey! I think I'll type it all out for posterity!"
You're welcome. Someone has to expose you rich, white liberals to what is really happenin' in the hood.

Are you saying everything I said was correct other than the ghetto bastards comment?

Me thinks you're a troll. Never post anything of substance, just random stupid comments time to time.
 
You're welcome. Someone has to expose you rich, white liberals to what is really happenin' in the hood.

Are you saying everything I said was correct other than the ghetto bastards comment?

Me thinks you're a troll. Never post anything of substance, just random stupid comments time to time.
You're a light in the darkness. Look at all the rich, white liberals you're reaching here on OOTB.

Are you saying that your "ghetto bastards comment" was incorrect?

"Me thinks" is a lame-ass message-board colloquialism... much like "spew" and "ilk."

This board is bulging with "random stupid comments." In fact, that's precisely why these boards exist... for people to drop random, stupid comments.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT