this is why you are a space cadet.
The woman is a little goofy, but she isn't saying anything that far-fetched (in spite of the interviewer's efforts to make it seem that way) unless you put it in that kaleidoscope of a brain of yours and turn it into the nonsense that no one but you intended it to be. Listening to her with an open mind, she isn't saying that Trump is actually president, she's saying that as far as SHE is concerned he is. In her heart. A de facto president if you will, not the official one. She refuses to accept that he isn't in the WH because she doesn't believe that the election was a fair one. That is not the fantastic POV you (and the interviewer) try to make it out to be.
Myself, I know Biden is officially president; but instead of thinking that Trump in my heart is the president, I just understand and accept that Biden should probably NOT be there for roughly the same reasons behind this woman's thinking. I believe that the 'officiality is tainted, and for that to be the case with an American institution makes my skin crawl. What's the difference? Why is what she says such a big deal? Only because you try to make it one. The minor difference is that my claim is of an illegitimate election that might have gone the other way had it not been for vote harvesting. Her contention is that it WOULD have gone the other way. None of this makes either one of us the looney toon that you try so hard yourself to be.
You just like tripping out on any opportunity to spew your brand of idiocy. You think it's clever, but it's just silly and obnoxious. Not
@Heels Noir level of obnoxiousness, but not that far off..