Where's the fun in that... not to mention the political damage and uncertainty it provides!
OOTB's Political Thread . ..
- Thread starter BillyL
- Start date
Yeah, the nefarious "deep state". Lol.
I noticed none of y'all answered a very basic question. Are you embarrassed about your behavior?
The maga-deep-state nuts are now insisting that Hurricane Helene was "created" on purpose to 1) Wipe-out the people living in WNC so "they" can mine all the lithium that's in the mountains and/or 2) prevent red voters from being able to vote in November. I'm not sure which one is more ridiculous. These are the MTG-level maga folks, the ones who refuse vaccines, shit like that.
This election, individual states, is going to come down to turnout. The lies are a desperate attempt to keep the base as riled up as possible. A few reds are getting tired of hearing about pet-eating Haitians... Maybe they'll fall for these lies though.
So man-made climate change is impossible, but humans can control hurricanes.
I think it can all kinda work together, if you want it to. "They" create the climate and "they" tax us, oppress us, or whatever works... in order to... profit from it and stuff. So, it stands to reason that "they" can produce storms to wipe-out any and all people. Fvck the collateral damage part.
You'd think if "they" could just conjure up a hurricane at will, then "they" could tap into lithium veins without destroying the landscape. I mean, I don't wanna dive too deep in the suspension of disbelief, but isn't anything possible? She doesn't even realize that by giving "they" such enormous control over the earth's atmosphere is also kinda putting a damper on the capability of the Abrahamic He-brew celestial monarch she worships. I mean, when does God run the meteorology show and when is it just the deep state cock-blocking Jehovah?
Regardless, almost 20,000 people "liked" her comment.
This is about as funny as the time Trump had the brilliant idea of dropping a nuclear bomb on a hurricane to get rid of it.
you know what I've always said.
But I wonder if anyone else has considered this, and right off the bat I have to say it isn't the same thing but it's kinda the same thing. Imagine a Red Dawn situation, some invading force has started taking over our country, our homeland, our homes....killing women and children collaterally and driving us into hiding while our homes burn....and so we begin a guerilla campaign. What would I do in that situation to any enemy bastard I could get my sights or my hands on? The gloves would be off for sure.
Now suppose that the invading force is huge and irresistible and we are forced to acknowledge that we have no chance fighting them head to head, and our guerilla campaign is making no real headway. Ask yourself. Would we turn to sheer terrorism? Would we do what we despise others for doing and having done? Would we consider ourselves to be just as despicable for planting shrapnel-laden bombs in public gathering places and pouring boiling oil over the heads of enemy combatants? Or would we believe that in a case like this any means is justified.
I hate terrorists and terrorism as much as anyone, but I don't always find it as objectionable as so many do. If I put myself in others' shoes, in some cases it's understandable. Don't go to someone else's home and try to take over, but if you do, do so as humbly and apologetically as possible. Or get what you're asking for.
most excellent GIF of one of my all-time favorite movie scenes, easily the best one in Tombstone.. Good job.
funny, I can't see where you've provided any substantiation of any of that. So I guess I'm free to relate the video I watched yesterday of some liberal female northerner purely gloating over the elimination of a number of 'redneck hillbilly Trump voters' in WNC. I wish I had brought it here, and now I doubt I can find it.
Similar threads
