OOTB's Political Thread . ..
- Thread starter BillyL
- Start date
it should, it's based on the observation of an astute observer. You fall back on tl;dr when you don't want to fall back on inanity. Either way, you fall back because there's no way you can go forward when you're just wrong.
Tell the oncologist that RFK Jr. said "I can't trust you!" Hopefully, he tells them to go ahead and add some lead to their Jack-and-Cokes. Speed up the process.
I already KNOW you're FOS. I don't need more and more dissertations to hammer it home.
can’t help you understand the joke if you can’t even see it.
what i can do is tell you he doesn’t understand the difference between cell phone and wifi exposure…he said he believes it’s the same, not my words, his…do you trust someone that believes that?
the kid watters, on fox news, thinks that because rfk can do a pull -up he’s a natural born health advocate.
Hey gentlemen... I've been gone from this board and Radar since end of last basketball season. All good, I didn't miss anything of import while away, did I? 
Good to be back. Looking forward to this Heels team. My son, DIL and brand new granddaughter are in Tallahassee. Son has graduated from law school, passed the bar, and is a clerk for a federal judge in FL state capitol. I will go there to see the FSU / UNC game in Feb.
Should be fun!
Best wishes - Heelicious.
Good to be back. Looking forward to this Heels team. My son, DIL and brand new granddaughter are in Tallahassee. Son has graduated from law school, passed the bar, and is a clerk for a federal judge in FL state capitol. I will go there to see the FSU / UNC game in Feb.
Should be fun!
Best wishes - Heelicious.
I saw that he was talking about not relying solely on a doctor's advice and then he was eating fast food I think. I have to assume that was supposed to be a joke but as a joke it was beyond lame and actually pointless.
wi-fi signals and cell signals are both radio frequencies, so although they are utilized differently, they are much the same in nature. There are serious questions of their effect on health. Radar, which also uses radio waves, is suspected according to studies of causing cancer. I trust someone who cautions that exposure to a great deal of radio waves at the frequencies in question could be harmful to us....and I'm glad someone is bringing that caution to the forefront instead of kowtowing to those concerns that might rather see such info suppressed.
Other than that, he's saying what I summarized...listen to your doctor but use common sense. Have you never heard that it's good to get second opinions regarding serious medical matters? That advice comes from the same school of thought, which is to not assume your doctor...just because he IS a doctor... is always steering you in the right direction. It is considered by most to be sound advice.
I'm still trying to see how this is some sort of 'gotcha'.
wait, you know I'm FOS for claiming that you use tl;dr and inanity to avoid admitting that you're wrong, when the proof is right there for all to see? LOL.
So, it's turning out that Oprah's production company actually got payments totaling closer to 2.5 mil. And, there are other accounting issues involved with some crazy numbers for things like DoorDash. Apparently, there's some gaps as well and it's looking like many of those rally attendees, well, let's just say it wasn't necessarily a conspiracy that they were bused in and potentially compensated for being there. If it did indeed happen, this is stuff that should have been fully explored and exposed by the big boys like NYT, WaPo, ABC, etc. Instead, they were in the bag for KH and ran a massive diversionary campaign with her. I find it disturbing and sad that the most reliable and timely news sources are turning out to be social media. There is just no way to separate in real time what is near the truth and what is some quack with an X account. We shouldn't have to completely guess on things.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/op...mpaign-far-more-than-initially-claimed-report
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/op...mpaign-far-more-than-initially-claimed-report
Fox News isn't a big boy? You trust it above all the others... it's the BIGGEST boy.
Fox News is full blown, in-your-face propaganda. And, they are the best at it. It's got you, and millions of others, refusing to trust anything except Fox News. You can't get any bigger or better than that.
Don't distrust @strummingram , he's the knower of all things.I thought Shoney was the biggest boy. No?
I got your big boy.
Big pharma is known for self-regulation (or abusing that realm) - and this is a fight I'd like to see someone handle, just not rfk via hhs lead. His skepticism is a good thing, junk science and not being able differentiate correlation and causation is dangerous.
It's harder to debunk conspiracy, lies or misinfo than it is to push them. If you want to believe the autism stuff, fine, but if you want education on the matter try somewhere other than ootb.
I guess that was her token job for the support. I voted for her in the primary years ago.
It would be nice if token jobs were not important for actual function of government. I'm okay with the EPA guy and a few others, but some these... wow. SCOTUS has given the executive branch more power than ever + congress seems feeble and cowardly if they aren't of the nutty-vindictive MTG swath... Not a good time to have unqualified people leading large important branches.
I wonder why Trump didn't confer with you guys before deciding on his cabinet?
He's a screw-up. He breaks everything he touches, I'm not surprised he didn't.
Autism and wifi/ultrasound beliefs aside, what makes RFK qualified to run such a massive org? We need people to make these more efficient and more effective while not disrupting our health for the worse
Hey! Isn't Marjorie Taylor Greene going to get a cabinet position? She's been ultra-faithful... and Kari Lake, too!
could you elaborate? Again please. Examples or other indications?
I'm more familiar with complaints (not from pharmas) of the FDA unreasonably holding up the release of new drugs than I am of pharmaceuticals getting drugs on the market that haven't been thoroughly vetted. Sometimes those drugs have been in use in foreign countries for some time. I want to see the FDA do what they are there to do without the CYA necessary to avoid undue backlash if everything doesn't go perfectly well. Safe and effective, and marketed honestly (as far as claims of effectiveness and safety are concerned). I really have no idea how good a job they do.
I gather that in Europe, the pharmas are sort of self-regulated through member orgs or other third party, non-governmental entities. That appeals to me but it makes me leery of too much coziness as well.
Oh lord, did you get your debunkulator up and running again? That thing was on the fritz for quite a while.
I mean, she is a woman. Is that not good enough? Or are we done with the DEI hiring practices?
Depending on the government for anything outside of protection from foreign threats is your first mistake.
That may not matter anymore. Are gays still on top of the victimhood totem pole? We need @Hark_The_Sound_2010 to weigh in. He's the one that keeps up with this stuff.
Similar threads
