Come on Billy, you're better than that. Calling these guys Nazis is just dumb.
I'm better than Trump, that I do know . .
Blame Luckovich if you don't like the cartoon.
Come on Billy, you're better than that. Calling these guys Nazis is just dumb.
Vice mayor of Charlotteville folks change his color and see how these tweets workout?
No, you just don't like it bc you know it's fake news. Why go into great detail when two words will summarize it? Lazy? Maybe. Accurate? Definitely.Don't use 'fake news' as a counter argument. It comes off as lazy, and you're smarter than that.
No, you just don't like it bc you know it's fake news. Why go into great detail when two words will summarize it? Lazy? Maybe. Accurate? Definitely.
It's one of the worst casualties of Trump's entire ccandidacy and administration. The notion of "alternate facts" and "fake news" seems like a new way to cast subterfuge on truth. It's yet another invention of the human race to conceal, or even resist, its own shame.Too many people use that term to dismiss what they don't agree with or like. Nothing to do with accuracy.
This isn't new to Trump. He may be the loudest about it, but he is far from the first.It's one of the worst casualties of Trump's entire ccandidacy and administration. The notion of "alternate facts" and "fake news" seems like a new way to cast subterfuge on truth. It's yet another invention of the human race to conceal, or even resist, its own shame.
No... he's not the first. We've had euphemisms as long as we've had language.This isn't new to Trump. He may be the loudest about it, but he is far from the first.
Not fake news!No... he's not the first. We've had euphemisms as long as we've had language.
This isn't new to Trump. He may be the loudest about it, but he is far from the first.
Obama did similar things to media outlets that weren't friendly to him. He wasn't as loud about it as Trump, but he did do it. I'm just trying to point out that it's not limited to Trump. He's just the loudest to do so.I think it's more damaging coming from the President. It's not merely criticizing CNN or NBC for click bait or sensationalism. It's that he's attacking anyone who criticizes him as 'fake news'. That's unsettling.
But I've been wrong before.That alone tells me he can't be familiar with the group and is unlikely to be a sympathizer.
The article cited says the alt-right members were asked to come in through the back of the park, where the police were stationed, but instead came in from all directions. I watched some of them forcefully push through a group of counter-protesters that included a church group that had interlocked their arms.This is a right leaning site, but this is not an opinion piece. The reporter that's quoted is the one that posted that the alt to fight was being attacked as they were led from the park. The chemicals the police chief referenced is the pepper spray I mentioned.
www.dailywire.com/news/19708/charlottesville-police-chief-there-were-mutually-frank-camp
"As an attendee of the Unite The Right rally and scheduled speaker..."First hand detailed account by a person that was supposed to speak at the legally permitted rally:
dailycaller.com/2017/08/14/heres-how-the-virginia-state-police-provoked-violence-at-charlottesville/
This is the kind of hyperbole that only exacerbates the problem, IMO.
Wow. Just wow. How does this guy hold a public office?White redneck dumbasses protest and violance breaks out and it is domestic terrorism, but BLM does it and it is an oppressed group that has the right to do so because of what happened to them 100 years ago?
This was terrible racism is an ugly thing and it turns my stomach to know that our America is an petty as to hate a man because of the color of this or her skin color, but the double standard is just a sickening!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Vice mayor of Charlotteville folks change his color and see how these tweets workout?
Yep . . they feel as if he is one of them.
and he can't distance himself...does not matter what he says or does.
and he can't distance himself...does not matter what he says or does.
Yes, and that's what's a shame. No matter what he says or does, it doesn't matter. People have their opinion of him, and they're sticking to it - facts be damned. Which is really sad - I see people (on here, and elsewhere) that seem like reasonably intelligent people, that just bury their heads in the sand and go along with any anti-trump rhetoric (or cartoons) they can find.
I've pointed out numerous times that I think Trump is a dope. But how he can get in trouble for someone else tweeting their support of him is beyond me. If ISIS tweeted support of Obama, does that mean that he's an Islamic Terrorist because the Islamic Terrorists support him? How would you and Billy have responded to that? If David Duke were smart he'd just tweet support of whatever candidates he didn't want to win next election, if everyone is going to brand those people white supremacists. Or, would it not work the same way if he tweeted support of Hillary?
This is the kind of hyperbole that only exacerbates the problem, IMO.
Yep, he can try, eventually his TrueTrump colors show, his PC @ Trump Tower today was epic . . an effort that likely will elevate his 34% approval rating ( LOL )
and he can't distance himself...does not matter what he says or does.
Want to make a bet on the 2020 election?
Yes, and that's what's a shame. No matter what he says or does, it doesn't matter. People have their opinion of him, and they're sticking to it - facts be damned. Which is really sad - I see people (on here, and elsewhere) that seem like reasonably intelligent people, that just bury their heads in the sand and go along with any anti-trump rhetoric (or cartoons) they can find.
I've pointed out numerous times that I think Trump is a dope. But how he can get in trouble for someone else tweeting their support of him is beyond me. If ISIS tweeted support of Obama, does that mean that he's an Islamic Terrorist because the Islamic Terrorists support him? How would you and Billy have responded to that? If David Duke were smart he'd just tweet support of whatever candidates he didn't want to win next election, if everyone is going to brand those people white supremacists. Or, would it not work the same way if he tweeted support of Hillary?
On whether there will even be one . . ? Ummmm, no thanks . .
Where?this fool is retweeting white nationalist tweets after the riot.
Where?
He cannot distance himself from people who have hated him since the get go. You are correct.
like obama
The rest of us who worry about jobs and national security and the stock market (I remember when some of the pro Obama bunch on here used to love to tout market performance) really don't give a damn.
who isn't concerned about those three?
I disagree. The only way to stop it is to name it for what it is: madness. Picking sides is a zero sum game where everyone is pissed off all the time.The problem has already been exacerbated to the nth degree. The only way to stop the madness is to ignore it.
I disagree. The only way to stop it is to name it for what it is: madness. Picking sides is a zero sum game where everyone is pissed off all the time.
He cannot distance himself from people who have hated him since the get go. You are correct.
I forgot that you never wish to back up what you say with a bet.
Some folks just caught onto him earlier than others . . looks to me as if he's losing support, rather than gaining any.
I can't make a statement without having to 'cover' a fvcking bet about it . . ?
I lost and paid $20 to bleeduncblue over the election. Get your fax right before throwing your BS out there . .
I heard Hannity yesterday broadcast a "medley" of Trump vehemently, directly, verbally rebuking, denouncing, and saying "I do not align with these people and don't want their support" (paraphrased). So, he has said he's not on their "team." I don't think Donald Trump is a white supremacist at all. I sure hope not. I'd find that hard to believe with a Jewish son-in-law and Jewish-converted daughter.