Another dumb response from you. How shocking.Give it a rest. We are a 1 seed, your man crush K isnt.
Another dumb response from you. How shocking.Give it a rest. We are a 1 seed, your man crush K isnt.
You don't know what the AHCA is going to cost , so don't act like you do. We have to pass it to see what's in it..............LMFAO UCA better than nothing? No it is worse than nothing. My premiums didn't go up 250% when there was nothing.
You don't know what the AHCA is going to cost , so don't act like you do. We have to pass it to see what's in it..............LMFAO UCA better than nothing? No it is worse than nothing. My premiums didn't go up 250% when there was nothing.
"plenty of experts"? The same ones who said Hildabeast would win in a landslide? There are no experts when it comes to health care and it sure isn't the gov't..I don't know but plenty of experts do and it predict it will cost more and delivery less. I guess it all comes down to you got yours, screw the other guy? Be thankful your premiums didn't go up 350%.
CC
"plenty of experts"? The same ones who said Hildabeast would win in a landslide? There are no experts when it comes to health care and it sure isn't the gov't..
Guess you didn't hear ....she lost! LMFAO .....and your experts turn out to be wrong more than not , just see the UCA.Since the "experts" called Clinton by 3-5% and she won by what, um, 3%, you may want to rethink your worthless comparison. And yes there are experts at predicting policy implications but I'm sure they are biased, or fake or some other excuse that allows you to ignore their advice.
CC
Only one flailing is you , as you continue to try and back pedal from your DSJ "tid bit" and I don't need to invent anything since the board and I now know to take your comments with a box of salt . I guess Boo got a big chuckle when he read your post and realized that you took it hook , line and sinker.Wow. Never said that BTW, but hey, keep flailing. Maybe you'll invent something to make yourself feel better, you know, like a certain night-tweeter does...
So Roy shouldn't have a freakin opinion about anything else in this world except Carolina basketball? You can't be serious. I hate this "shut your mouth and play" or "shut your mouth and coach" mentality. It's the same people that hate when professional athletes take social or political stance. There lives are affected by politics and policy just like everyone else. Being a high profile coach or players doesn't shield you from the repercussions of what goes on on capital hill or the white house. They are american citizens first and foremost and should be able to voice there opinion.Roy needs to pay more attention to basketball and less attention to social media and politics.. If he wants to run for political office he will have time to do that when he is through coaching..Same goes for Krat.
I think the biggest issue is that he was being interviewed about a basketball game and maybe he should stick to the "subject".So Roy shouldn't have a freakin opinion about anything else in this world except Carolina basketball? You can't be serious. I hate this "shut your mouth and play" or "shut your mouth and coach" mentality. It's the same people that hate when professional athletes take social or political stance. There lives are affected by politics and policy just like everyone else. Being a high profile coach or players doesn't shield you from the repercussions of what goes on on capital hill or the white house. They are american citizens first and foremost and should be able to voice there opinion.
You really are a sad case, aren't you? Not that this even deserves a response, but as I said at the time, I reported Boo Williams' statement that was heard by several coaches, just as it was said... and I also said that I didn't buy what Boo was selling. There were too many other factors at work (handler). And as a matter of fact I made of point at the time of that post of admonishing folks not to throw it back at me if Boo's lament didn't come true. because it probably wouldn't.Only one flailing is you , as you continue to try and back pedal from your DSJ "tid bit" and I don't need to invent anything since the board and I now know to take your comments with a box of salt . I guess Boo got a big chuckle when he read your post and realized that you took it hook , line and sinker.
Oh so you were spreading "fake news".You really are a sad case, aren't you? Not that this even deserves a response, but as I said at the time, I reported Boo Williams' statement that was heard by several coaches, just as it was said... and I also said that I didn't buy what Boo was selling. There were too many other factors at work (handler). And as a matter of fact I made of point at the time of that post of admonishing folks not to throw it back at me if Boo's lament didn't come true. because it probably wouldn't.
Now, granted, for the feeble-minded it may be hard to grasp anything more nuanced than "See Spot run", but if somehow you think any of that is supposed to make me look bad?... then you are just a damned fool. Thanks for the laugh though.
Since the "experts" called Clinton by 3-5% and she won by what, um, 3%
No... that would be in your realm.Oh so you were spreading "fake news".![]()
Now these are alternative facts. I may not be very bright, but I do know that Trump won the race.
And the experts were predicting Clinton to win the popular AND the electoral votes, for those that may have conveniently forgotten.
Guess you didn't hear ....she lost! LMFAO .....and your experts turn out to be wrong more than not , just see the UCA.
LMFAO....so you are going with the imaginary Russian hack. Be sure to let me know what exactly they hacked and why they would want Trump over Hillary , when Hil would be the one cutting defense spending??? Your arguments just keep getting weaker.She did - but it was a split decision and the Russian judge totally jobbed her!
CC
Technically, according to the constitution it was a unanimous win. The electoral college is the only one that counts. Life would be easier if everyone would just accept the fact that he won. It would also be nice if people actually understood how much power a president really has, which is nowhere near as much as people seem to think.She did - but it was a split decision and the Russian judge totally jobbed her!
CC
A little advice: the more you flail, the faster you'll drown.Still flailing much?
I've been backstroking , you still trying to drown your DSJ story but that thing just won't go down the drain and you are starting to cramp badly.. Mean while Trump still winning and setting the agenda with his tweets. The man is a leader and negotiator without peer.A little advice: the more you flail, the faster you'll drown.
Methinks you'd better hope for a lifeguard at this point, or start dog-paddling toward the shore. This little swim hasn't gone very well for ya...![]()
Poor fella. Ya see... there's the difference.I've been backstroking , you still trying to drown your DSJ story but that thing just won't go down the drain and you are starting to cramp badly.. Mean while Trump still winning and setting the agenda with his tweets. The man is a leader and negotiator without peer.
Love how your story has changed , but it won't work that hook was in soooo deep it had to be cut out. I know Boo or your mafia buddy or whoever still chuckles to themselves when they think about reeling you in on that one. You were as giddy as a school girl when you repeated it on Radar. Trump still winning and still setting the agenda....Gar Bear not so much and has now resorted to silly little meme's. I WIN.Poor fella. Ya see... there's the difference.
I simply recounted a story (that was 100% true) about someone I said was likely full of sh**...
You actually choose to believe someone who is 100% full of sh**.
...annnnnddd he's down for the count.
![]()
You really shouId've thought twice before you got into this.
I'd offer to help but I'm bored with it now, so...
LMFAO....so you are going with the imaginary Russian hack. Be sure to let me know what exactly they hacked and why they would want Trump over Hillary , when Hil would be the one cutting defense spending??? Your arguments just keep getting weaker.
CC asks "When was the last time ANBODY cut defense spending?"
This, according to Politifact, on an article discussing military spending under Obama:
"Overall spending on national security includes the Pentagon budget as well as spendingby other agencies, such as the Energy Department’s work on nuclear weapons. Spending increased in 2010 and 2011, but it has fallen every year for four years since then by a cumulative 15 percent.
Other ways of looking at the question show declines as well. National security spending made up 20.1 percent of the federal budget in 2010, but in 2015 it was 15.9 percent. Over the same period, spending fell from 4.6 percent of gross domestic product to 3.3 percent."
But I am not here to force my political views on you any more than you want to hear them. I am here to talk UNC basketball, I want Roy to limit his public scope to just that as well.
Assuming makes you an {ASS}ume which is appropriate for you because it goes with and fits right in behind the dumb. I am now tired of arguing down to your level since you don't understand the math.Cool (I assumed he just kept spending flat.)
CC
Thx maybe you finally penetrated that thick Canuck skull.CC asks "When was the last time ANBODY cut defense spending?"
This, according to Politifact, on an article discussing military spending under Obama:
"Overall spending on national security includes the Pentagon budget as well as spendingby other agencies, such as the Energy Department’s work on nuclear weapons. Spending increased in 2010 and 2011, but it has fallen every year for four years since then by a cumulative 15 percent.
Other ways of looking at the question show declines as well. National security spending made up 20.1 percent of the federal budget in 2010, but in 2015 it was 15.9 percent. Over the same period, spending fell from 4.6 percent of gross domestic product to 3.3 percent."
Those consequences could range from annoying some pinheads on a free bball forum to pissing of his employer and losing his job.
Assuming makes you an {ASS}ume which is appropriate for you because it goes with and fits right in behind the dumb. I am now tired of arguing down to your level since you don't understand the math.
I don't think there's anything that Roy, or anyone else, could say that would be considered too "left" for UNC.
Assuming makes you an {ASS}ume which is appropriate for you because it goes with and fits right in behind the dumb. I am now tired of arguing down to your level since you don't understand the math.
I have no issues with your post except this. You don't want to force your political views on anybody but you do want to limit what Roy does in public.
Roy can (and should) comment on any subject he want's to just like you or I. He has to live with the consequences of those comments. Those consequences could range from annoying some pinheads on a free bball forum to pissing of his employer and losing his job. Either way, that is up to Roy, not you, me, or anyone else.
CC