ADVERTISEMENT

Prediction Contest Results Through Wake Forest

Contest #2

131​
slothrop8
120​
Tarheels39
107​
shane023
105​
NorCalTarheel
102​
Go Heels #1
90​
adwood81
84​
heels05champs
84​
Travis2262
77​
gregkb14
75​
HeelzLover
75​
sctarheel30
69​
notashelbyfan
69​
the Sky is Carolina Blue!
66​
pooponduke
66​
gauchoheel
63​
jim0742
63​
DSouthr
63​
RoseHeel
60​
Kadyn930
60​
Heels5150
57​
Munkles
57​
IDUNK4HEELS
57​
srcmt
57​
gobblercalls
57​
venom660turbo
57​
jrhessey
54​
tarheel0910
54​
al would
51​
Occy64
51​
Lewis&Miller
48​
HOWSWEETITISTOBEATARHEEL
42​
Camacot
39​
Camel79
39​
racinheel
39​
kwtarheel11
36​
Steat
33​
TPFKAPFS
30​
montana_heel
30​
midline
24​
SorryNotSorry
24​
Camel79
21​
What Would Jesus Do?
15​
imajericho
12​
Heelicious
12​
keith1982
12​
FaithPlusOne
12​
Ozheelfan
12​
whitie1234
12​
Tarheelsman71
12​
uncrph
12​
djones1975
12​
RobJones__
12​
Mrs.Jeans15
12​
lum1-h-dogg
12​
uncboy10
12​
gdean44
12​
CarolinaBlue5
12​
GoToHeelDook
12​
Bubspub88
12​
Rabidfrog
12​
Canadian_Heel
12​
Assasin3200
12​
strummingram
12​
dtodd4475
9​
Goheels83
6​
Old_School59


Contest #1

264​
Go Heels #1
249​
Tarheels39
225​
heels05champs
223​
RoseHeel
198​
slothrop8
192​
sctarheel30
190​
jrhessey
189​
adwood81
189​
shane023
183​
al would
183​
the Sky is Carolina Blue!
177​
Heels5150
177​
Travis2262
174​
tarheel0910
171​
gobblercalls
168​
Munkles
168​
NorCalTarheel
165​
notashelbyfan
162​
HeelzLover
156​
DSouthr
156​
gauchoheel
153​
gregkb14
147​
Steat
147​
Lewis&Miller
135​
imajericho
135​
IDUNK4HEELS
132​
srcmt
126​
jim0742
123​
Camacot
123​
Camel79
123​
SorryNotSorry
123​
pooponduke
123​
venom660turbo
116​
kwtarheel11
114​
TPFKAPFS
111​
dtodd4475
111​
Occy64
105​
montana_heel
102​
HOWSWEETITISTOBEATARHEEL
96​
Heelicious
93​
racinheel
91​
What Would Jesus Do?
78​
FaithPlusOne
75​
keith1982
75​
whitie1234
75​
Goheels83
72​
Ozheelfan

GG Jackson spews hate on SC coaches and teammates

Login to view embedded media Login to view embedded media Login to view embedded media


One draft scout commented: "Both," the scout answered whether Jackson had helped or hurt himself this season. "He ascended some earlier in the year but a lot of that was supported by the age but then the more you watch him, the more you get confused about his IQ for the game, what he lacks and what he can improve on. The game doesn't come easy for him, he shot-hunts, things are about him and now he is sinking for me a little bit."

I find this very amusing and it was great for a laugh on a day I think all UNC fans need a laugh.

Kerwin Walton

I was just curious to see how Walton has been doing at Texas Tech. I haven't watched any of their games but thought some of you might be interested in how he's doing from a statistical standpoint.

12.8 Minutes per game
3 Starts
4.4 PPG
1 RPG
0.5 APG
0.5 TO/g
50.8% FG%
22/49 on 3's for 44.9%

Averaging a career high offensive rating of 127.4.
On the flip side, averaging a career low on defensive rating at 106.5.
+/- of 2.7

DEFENSE is This Team's Big Problem

20230202_UNCBball_PPPHx.jpg


As evidenced in the scatter plot, UNC finds itself, once again, with a team that (as a whole) executes well on offense, but is woefully inadequate on defense. In fact, since the advent of the 3-point line in 1987, UNC has only had 4 teams that were worse on defense. One of those four is the 2002 team, while the other three are from the last 5 seasons: 2018, 2020, and 2022. Last season's team has the controversial reputation of a terrible defensive team that turned it around in February. Is this team poised for a turn around?

If we look at last year's team in its first 22 games and compare it to this year's team, we insert trend lines and compare the two:

20230202_PPPAllowed_gm22.png

Note: UNC's historical average is 0.844 points per possession allowed

This graph shows us that the current team started out better defensively than last year's team, but unlike last year's team, it is allowing more and more points per possession as the season wears on. At least the 2022 team was trending in the right direction at this point.

UNC Defense (2023)​

UNC Offense (2023)​

20230129_UNCD_norm.png
20230129_UNCO_norm.png

If we compare this team's points per possession on offense and defense to the previous 27 seasons, we get a better understanding not only of where this team stands, but also of how likely they are to improve in these areas. A Normal Distribution is much like a spring; there is a pull toward the historical average that gets stronger the further one gets from that average. Too, the room for improvement narrows considerably as one advances beyond the average, much like a multi-lane highway merging down to one lane.

As we can see from these two curves, this year's team is above average on offense and well below average on defense. We can improve our shot selection, our accuracy, and our passing, but the likelihood of getting considerably more efficient on offense is not high. Conversely, there is much room for improvement on defense, and the team shouldn't encounter as much resistance to getting better than it faces with getting better on offense.

The theme of February needs to be defense.
  • Like
Reactions: TarHeelMark

Carolina at Wake Forest game thread on: Tuesday 7 February 2023.

Things are beginning to look a little bleak right now but with Wake, Clemson and Miami next on the schedule Carolina has a excellent opportunity to make a bunch of noise and progress. My hope that last year’s disaster in Winston Salem does not show its ugly head again. Mansanto has been burning up the nets recently and with Appleby still playing at all ACC caliber clip Wake is loaded. Playing defense has not been UNC’s strong point this season but to win this battle away from home the defense needs to get energized and play like Miami did against Duke last night…

As important as this game to me as a fan is I can only hope the Tar Heels can pull this one out without my constant play by play and posting here. Today is my wife’s birthday and I am taking her to the Tanger Center in Greensboro to watch “River Dance” which is currently on tour in the States. Yes I have my priorities right and I know it. Thank goodness I can DVD the game…

Are We Being Too Hard on Caleb?

It seems like nearly everybody here is down on Caleb. Are we being fair?

As some here have pointed out, Caleb has that extra gear, and when he's in that gear, he's impressive, fun to watch, and can single-handedly win games for us.

Everybody loves that Caleb.

But he hasn't been in that gear all that much this season. And when he isn't in that gear, we tend to beat him up. When our other players don't have good games, we may point it out. We may bitch - especially after a loss. In RJ's case, for a while there, people piled on him for over-dribbling, but we also recognized that wasn't entirely RJ's fault. People routinely bitch about Leaky not being much of a scoring threat. But few call for him to be benched.

But we don't cut Caleb any slack.

Is it because Caleb was so high-ranked?

Is it because he's cocky?

Is it because he doesn't come across as committed to the team?

Sometimes I ask myself if I would be more forgiving if Caleb had been #50 out of HS. Or if he smiled more than once every 3 games. And I think the answer is, yes I would be more forgiving. I'd be glad when Caleb gave us those flashes, but wouldn't be expecting them all the time. Just like with most other players. It's not Caleb's fault that the HS scouts made a mistake when they ranked him.

Speaking for myself, I'm going to try to cut Caleb more slack. It's not his fault that he isn't the superstar I want him to be - any more than it's RJ's fault that he isn't 6'5, or Leaky's fault that he doesn't have a high-revving motor. They are what they are.
  • Like
Reactions: thompsjj

Stat Review: @Wake Forest (2/7/23)

STATVALUEPCTLEHISTORICAL COMPARISON
Base Stats
FG%4120
UNC_statBox_15.png
3FG%2214
UNC_statBox_10.png
2FG%4629
UNC_statBox_25.png
FT%8182
UNC_statBox_80.png
fg%4439
UNC_statBox_35.png
3fg%2675
UNC_statBox_70.png
2fg%5128
UNC_statBox_25.png
ft%7924
UNC_statBox_20.png
PTS/POSS0.8731
UNC_statBox_30.png
pts/poss1.067
UNC_statBox_5.png
TOTPOSS18584
UNC_statBox_80.png
POSDIF1190
UNC_statBox_90.png
%LOB1278
UNC_statBox_75.png
%lob62
UNC_statBox_0.png
SmithIdx-0.29018
UNC_statBox_5.png
Interesting Stats
AST/FG0.301
UNC_statBox_0.png
ast/to2.401
UNC_statBox_0.png
%from33170
UNC_statBox_70.png
%FROM324.332
UNC_statBox_30.png

STAT = Statistic being reported
VALUE = Value of reported stat from the current game
PCTLE = Percentile When Compared to All UNC Games since 1996
Historical Comparison = Graphic Portrayal of PCTLE. Marks depict 20% quintiles, as well as 50%.

FG% = UNC Total Field Goal Percentage (47.0% avg since 1996)
3FG% = UNC 3-point Field Goal Percentage (35.6%)
2FG% = UNC 2-point Field Goal Percentage (51.4%)
FT% = UNC Free Throw Percentage (70.0%)
fg% = Opponent Total Field Goal Percentage (41.6%)
3fg% = Opponent 3-point Field Goal Percentage (33.8%)
2fg% = Opponent 2-point Field Goal Percentage (45.9%)
ft% = Opponent Free Throw Percentage (68.2%)
PTS/POSS = UNC Points Per Possession (Smith Method, 0.934)
pts/poss = Opponent Points Per Possession (Smith Method, 0.846))
POSS = UNC Total Possessions (Smith Method, 85.6)
POSDIF = UNC Advantage in Total Possessions (Smith Method, 2.03)
%LOB = UNC Percentage Loss of Ball (TO/POSS, 15.9)
%lob = Opponent Percentage Loss of Ball (to/poss, 16.4)

MOV = Margin of Victory (9.43)
%FROM3 = UNC Percentage of FG Attempts Taken From 3 (35.6%)
AST/POSS = UNC Assists Per Possession (Smith Method, 0.20)
AST/FG = UNC Assists Per Field Goal (0.59)
AST/TO = UNC Assists Per Turnover (1.4)
%from3 = Opponent Percentage of Shots Taken From 3 (33.8)
ast/poss = Opponent Assists Per Possession (Smith Method, 0.16)
ast/fg = Opponent Assists Per Field Goal (0.52)
ast/to = Opponent Assists Per Turnover (1.1)
poss = Opponents Total Possessions (Smith Method) (83.6)
TOTPOSS = Total Possessions in the Game(Smith Method, 169.3)
SmithIdx = UNC Total of Pts/Poss minus Offensive Goal (0.95) + Defensive Goal (0.85) minus Opponent Pts/Poss (avg: -0.01)
Discussion
One steaming hot pile of it were the Tar Heels for 3/4 of this game. The total stats don't tell the story because UNC mounted a furious comeback in the 4th quarter of the game, but make no mistake, we all saw a broken team. In the first half UNC only mustered 0.57 points per possession while allowing Wake Forest to score 1.15 points per possession. That's a Smith Index (difference) of -0.58. I don't have historical records broken down by half, but the worst whole-game performance by a UNC team was the 2003 game at Maryland where the Terps scored 0.537 points per possession more than the Heels. It's doubtful that UNC has had many halves that were worse than last night's first half.

Once again UNC got 0.30 assists per field goal, a figure that has only been worse in 16 games since 1996. They shot 22% from 3 and 41% from the floor overall.

Defensively the Heels allowed 2.40 assists/turnover. That's a rate that only 33 of the last 982 opponents have reached. We also saw a #1 performance: Wake Forest's Tyree Appleby set an ACC record with his 23 made free throws.

It's a broken record: this team doesn't create turnovers, they don't pass the ball, and they take terrible shots. As long as Hubert Davis allows his players to continue getting playing time without impunity, we won't see a change, and this will be the first preseason #1 team to miss making the NCAA tournament.
  • Like
Reactions: TarHeelMark
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT