Dude.
Good job, man. I'm sure it took a while to put together a lucid, intelligent, well thought-out response. I'm proud of you.
Dude.
I'm still waiting on those corroborating sources.She gave the direction to police to give the protestors the space to destroy - her words, not mine.
Here's a thought. Don't talk down to me and maybe you'll get just such a response.Good job, man. I'm sure it took a while to put together a lucid, intelligent, well thought-out response. I'm proud of you.
You're right, I realized I was being a dick about it, and I still hit "post" anyway. That's just me being frustrated. Sorry. At this point, I'll simply mention that Mary Willingham was a very visible, named source who claimed that 70% of our student-athletes read below a high school level. Just one example folks here can relate to.Ok,..no need to be a dick about it. I've just never seen you state your skepticism of unnamed sources with such vehemence before and it appeared you were doing so just because it was Nuk. You've always had a hard-on for debating with him.
You're right, I realized I was being a dick about it, and I still hit "post" anyway. That's just me being frustrated. Sorry. At this point, I'll simply mention that Mary Willingham was a very visible, named source who claimed that 70% of our student-athletes read below a high school level. Just one example folks here can relate to.
I don't have a hard-on for debating Nuk. In fact, I kind of hate it. But I don't like standing idly by as he constantly props up anything that supports his world view as truth and anything that contradicts his world view as falsehood, Occam be damned. It strikes me as intellectually dishonest, divisive, and condescending.
My mistake, of course, is failing to recognize the futility of it all. Probably best to just walk away.
Here's a thought. Don't talk down to me and maybe you'll get just such a response.
Oh and with regards to the Baltimore mayor- would.
That's pretty hilarious, considering your gem of a post that started this back-and-forth. Let's review, shall we?Here's another thought. If you can't respond to a post with intelligence and insight, take a swig from a tall glass of STFU.
No shit, Sherlock. That post would have been patronizing even if my mother, uncle, and grandfather weren't all journalists. Better pour yourself a tall one.Journalists often use the unnamed sources part to keep information flowing to them. If a person knows some information and will share it with journalist is mostly because the person trusts the journalist not to reveal their name because the information they are giving the journalist is frequently not public knowledge or hasnt been released yet. The journalist will not share the name because they (journalist) wants to keep getting information from the source.
Thanks. I posted this release earlier in the thread. It was summarily dismissed, of course.And this is the full text of the statement from the mayor’s office the next day, Sunday.
That's pretty hilarious, considering your gem of a post that started this back-and-forth. Let's review, shall we?
No shit, Sherlock. That post would have been patronizing even if my mother, uncle, and grandfather weren't all journalists. Better pour yourself a tall one.
Let's call a truce. I was being sarcastic when I responded to GSD about the lesson in journalism, and you probably missed that (I guess there's such a thing as being too sarcastic). You obviously did think I was stupid, LOL, which is why you responded the way you did. I apologize for escalating the issue by being a smartass with the "Dude" response. I was frustrated.You acted as if you dont think sources are credible unless the name of source is given. I apologize if you feel offended by what I posted.
Thanks. I posted this release earlier in the thread. It was summarily dismissed, of course.
Yeah, I just saw that. I am already assuming that if true the focus will then go to "they should have strapped him in a seatbelt"Reports are leaking that Freddie Gray was trying to injure himself . Who knows the truth? Although, this could be another "hands up, don't shoot" lie and folks are rioting over nothing but a false narrative. Also, it could be a bit of both in that Freddie Gray injured himself and cops helped or made worse. We may never know.
You're right, I realized I was being a dick about it, and I still hit "post" anyway. That's just me being frustrated. Sorry. At this point, I'll simply mention that Mary Willingham was a very visible, named source who claimed that 70% of our student-athletes read below a high school level. Just one example folks here can relate to.
I don't have a hard-on for debating Nuk. In fact, I kind of hate it. But I don't like standing idly by as he constantly props up anything that supports his world view as truth and anything that contradicts his world view as falsehood, Occam be damned. It strikes me as intellectually dishonest, divisive, and condescending.
My mistake, of course, is failing to recognize the futility of it all. Probably best to just walk away.
Yeah, I just saw that. I am already assuming that if true the focus will then go to "they should have strapped him in a seatbelt"
I also saw a report that Gray had recently had spinal surgery, although I haven't read it in any respectable publication.
I'm still waiting on those corroborating sources.
There was a stop that the cops never made a statement about and never reported. If the film had never been found, the stop would have never known. Some of the cops have lied in their statements, if they lied about this, what else have they lied about???
They may have lied about injuring Mr Gray. That's where this is going. Unravel the lies omitted, there the truth lies.
He has "sources ".Well yes, they may very well have lied. Can you give me a link where I can read more about this alleged coverup?
He has "sources ".
Well yes, they may very well have lied. Can you give me a link where I can read more about this alleged coverup?
So you're ok with them lying??? What happened to the integrity of the badge?? No different than the ones they're supposed to investigate. They have credibility issues now with any arrest they've been involved with.
I don't have a clue whether the police are in the wrong or not but I don't see it as a race issue.
Cops charged. Would they have been charged without all the attention being brought to this case from riots and protests? I'm not sure the answer is yes.
Police charged in death of Freddie Gray..
So do protesters keep protesting? The AG had her facts, and now courts will decide. Its too bad she didn't at least suggest to protesters to let her do her job, and they get back to theirs, which I guess is protesting.