What I found to be even more notable than Fox numbers was the CNN/MSNBC numbers. Fox was 14 points higher than the "None" category, which I think is a good baseline. CNN/MSNBC was 41(!) points below that baseline. Viewers of both are sheep, but the CNN/MSNBC crowd seems much sheepier from this poll.
If everyone could? If everyone could, we would already be on the back end of the thing. You're not going to get compliance to that list... no way, no day. And, especially not now. Lots of protesting to do, and scoffing at the numbers.
The entire group has obviously gotten even more skeptical, which sucks, since this country needs less division not more. But why is "none" the good baseline. That chart is ONLY people who believe in overcounting, (which is like a third of everyone polled).
Yes, it's a percentage who believe the count is inflated. As in 38% of Fox viewers don't believe it's overcounted. The "None" is a good benchmark because it is (presumably) free from media bias on the topic. The fox bias clearly skews towards believing its overcounted - by 14% over the benchmark (i.e. the people who don't watch a news network). The CNN/MSNBC bias skews even more heavily towards the opposite, at 41% below the benchmark.
It isn't showing the percentage who believe the count is inflated. It is showing the changes, grouped by viewership, of those who believe the count is inflated.
No, you're wrong. It's saying 62% of Fox viewers polled believe it's overcounted. Not that 62% of those that believe it's overcounted get their news from Fox. The guy posting the tweet even says as much in the tweet.
I mispoke, my bad. But I think you are still wrong on part.
Nah, this is just another conspiracy. Probably the same crazy "science" that tries to say global warming is real and the earth isn't flat.
June 20 was the Trump Rally, he tested positive June 28th and was hospitalized July 1st. Pics of him surrounded by people without masks...
It's crazy that it takes 5 months for science to prove that masks protect the wearer too. Better late than never i guess.
True. I couldn't believe it took the Speaker of the House this long to require masks in the House Chamber. But as you said, better for her to be late than never.
And, fvck it if I get other people sick in the process. WHo knows how many people Cain infected! If Cain had worn a mask, he'd possibly still be alive, or if the person that was infected had been wearing one!
Oh I'm not surprised politics is so slow. Are you saying the slow science hindered the politics?
Are you slow?
