Boring topic + longest poast in the history of OOTB = 0 star thread
Flying Flynny . .
- Thread starter BillyL
- Start date
I don't know... should they?
Should they have set Berlin on fire and started killing Gentiles and murdering all non-Jews? Is that what they should have done? Should they have started violent, racist groups that hated non-Jews and tried to take over the country and killed all the people who weren't Jewish?
Would that have been a good plan?
I am not talking about them hating non-Jews. I am asking a simple question -- Should the Jewish people have fought back to save their OWN people. Very simple question.
If you, god forbid, ever have kids, and they are getting the shit beat out of them because of their dad, please tell them to lay there and take it.
I know, I am answering your question. I'm answering it with the suggestion that they fight back with the same force. Doing that WOULD HAVE "saved their own people." Just kick more ass and kill more non-Jews and you win, right?
Oh, I want more kids to fight with them. I want to see how many gangs of kids I can muster-up to fight one another and make sure the one that exhibits the most physical might is right. Whoever can kick the most ass is the better person, group, club, etc.. That's how it works, right?
You're choosing to purposely twist a very simple question to further your agenda (not that this sounds familiar or anything).
I am talking about defensing themselves -- that has absolutely n-o-t-h-i-n-g to do with them equating that was being done to them. Come on man, we might not agree, but you're smarter than this. I haven't lost faith in you yet!
I'm using the method you prefer. The method you're advocating. You have to fight back harder and kill as many of them as you can before they kill you and your "tribe." That's how it's always been. We have to maintain that. Might makes right. Caveman-style!
I'm not "twisting the question." I'm just giving you an answer that you don't like. You're implying that they SHOULD have fought back. Okay, they should have. If you're going to fight back, don't half-ass it. Fight to the end.
Bingo. I have long felt he is here purely to rile everyone up. Hell, at times I even get a good chuckle out of it.
A lot of them tried to immigrate to the USA, but we were refusing refugees then, too.
Pretty sure strum and chick are sitting in the dark dropping acid tonight while taking turns poasting in this thread.
If you're getting a good chuckle, then you're not really riled-up.
You're one of the board's ardent Christians. Do you just gloss-over Jesus's admonition of violence and to turn the other cheek? Or, is that just Sunday talk?
I have been over this before...must have been Chick's day to post and you missed it.
It is Biblically required -- please note that part -- to defend those who are unable to defend themselves.
Good try, though. And it's extremely hard to get me riled up on here. I can see through the smoke-screen...you're talking to someone who made a living as an instigator all through high school. This is easily recognized from a mile away. That's why I know you can't get pissed off on here either -- it's physically impossible to accomplish it -- because you're only here for your own amusement, thinking you're outsmarting everyone and pitting these good folks against each other. Quite clever, actually, if you can pull it off without anyone noticing. I'll shut up, for a nominal fee...
I see, so, allowing them here, peacefully, that was a no-go. It made a LOT more sense to send them back, allowing the Nazis to murder them... then go over there and set the joint on fire... after the ones who tried to immigrate here were long dead. You get to kill a few million more, lose several hundred thousand of your own people, and starve, displace and kill god-only-knows how many more innocent people. Mission accomplished! I stand corrected.
You're a genius. I keep forgetting.I have been over this before...must have been Chick's day to post and you missed it.
It is Biblically required -- please note that part -- to defend those who are unable to defend themselves.
Good try, though. And it's extremely hard to get me riled up on here. I can see through the smoke-screen...you're talking to someone who made a living as an instigator all through high school. This is easily recognized from a mile away. That's why I know you can't get pissed off on here either -- it's physically impossible to accomplish it -- because you're only here for your own amusement, thinking you're outsmarting everyone and pitting these good folks against each other. Quite clever, actually, if you can pull it off without anyone noticing. I'll shut up, for a nominal fee...
You keep telling yourself that advocating the killing other people is "defending those who can't defend themselves" and I'm sure you'll be fine.
Tangential question -- if time did exist and we were back in the civil war days, would you be the dude playing the flute while everyone else shot cannons by your head?
Use more big words like tangential and you will make better progress with this guy. He's thumbing thru Websters right now.
I heard the stash was running low...emergency trip to Colorado to replenish.
Strum,
It's cool -- I'm not going to out your game on here. Most folks on this board probably dropped off this thread several pages ago, so I'm sure everything is safely still on the DL. Just wait for another political thread and continue on.
Keep on keepin' it real.
It's cool -- I'm not going to out your game on here. Most folks on this board probably dropped off this thread several pages ago, so I'm sure everything is safely still on the DL. Just wait for another political thread and continue on.
Keep on keepin' it real.
I've forgotten, actually, where I was from 1861-65. I'm sure I was trolling or riling-up someone, somewhere.
