Checks would be sent. Even more than they already are.
Is Mr. Floyd's Death Being Used To Change All Of Society?
- Thread starter ChapelHeeled
- Start date
Checks would be sent. Even more than they already are.
lol I love that the “white” portion of that description of you is the one you call into question.
Fair question, but I’m good knowing the other 5 words are indisputable.
I do think Chauvin is a POS that I couldn't give two shits about sitting in jail for a long time.
Maxine Waters', Biden’s pre-Chauvin verdict comments come under scrutiny as defense eyes appeal
Derek Chauvin's murder conviction was met with widespread approval among those seeking justice for George Floyd, but the trial's outcome may not be set in stone thanks to remarks from influential political leaders such as Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., and President Biden himself.www.foxnews.com
However, if Maxine Waters' stupidity and Biden's comments caused this whole thing to get fvcked up on appeal, I would absolutely be HERE for that shitstorm.
lol.. can you imagine this new conference..
"we have reviewed what Mrs. Waters said and because of this we have a mistrial in the Chauvin case. No further comment at this time"
I love that you are an admitted racist now.
Well, I'm not pissed off...except that Minneapolis didnt get torched. That would have made me ecstatic!
can you clear this up for me?
are you in favor of looting, riots, and cities burning?
I believe in letting people express their anger and frustration. It's ok to be confrontational when feeling hurt and disappointed. You just dont get it. When people having been personally experiencing hurt and pain for over 200+ years, it's ok to let your feelings show.
So, yeah...as long as it doesn't physically harm me or my inner circle, I'm ok with it. It's just property...it can be replaced. That's what insurance is for.
i don’t know where to go with this.
“you’re for it”
almost to a man nobody has been in favor of this other than people wanting or encouraging chaos or saying this on a message board to create a division or look like some contrarian...and you know who you are, the ones that get affirmation from a message board(not even implying that’s you).
“you just don’t get it”
as in me?...i don’t get the feeling of being wronged, hurt, or disappointed?
not with regards to racism or prejudice, but i’ve felt disappointed and hurt...i wanted a job in 1998 that i didn’t get and i was overqualified for it...i didn’t get it, was crushed...what i do is hope they learn and move on, me included.
“as long as it doesn’t physically harm me or my inner circle”
agree, but i would also hope people i don’t know aren’t not harmed as well.
“it’s just property, that’s why i pay for insurance.”
this is just odd to me...let’s say i agree with you...however, what are the chances nobody is hurt at all in any demonstration, riot, or any looting?...has that ever occurred?
Yes and absolute power given to the police. Use lethal force at their discretion. Do away with body Cams and make video taping police a felony. Then sit back and let the fun begin.
Last edited:
I disagree. Lethal force...in fact ANY force... should only be used with prior per-incident community approval IN WRITING, and any and all police actions should be subject to unrestricted direct voluntary community interaction, including physical interference, video taping, and body cavity searches of on-the-scene police. Furthermore, police actions resulting in harm to property and/or individuals, including actions taken to protect property and/or individuals, should result in harsh disciplinary action taken against the involved officers and monetary compensation for anyone in any way offended.
@chickenhunter is better at this than you.
I think that would be a GREAT idea. Then you could show everyone else how to do it correctly.
First, rabble-rousers and media are always fired-up, just like the previous cop cases.
Second, regarding "Who is actually stupid enough to think that one of the cops is taking an action that he figures might very well result in the suspect's death, right there in front of God and everyone"
Some bad cops think they can "get away with murder" because of their badge.
The jury found Chauvin intended to assault Floyd and the result was death. - this is "felony murder". Not premeditated murder, just premeditated assault. It was deemed he tried to commit an assault that could cause bodily harm based on video, testimony from other cops, experts and witnesses...
Also jury only needed to find that the kneeling was “substantial cause” of the death, not its sole cause. Makes sense to me.
Forgive me if 'what makes sense to you' isn't what I use as a guiding light. This was a particularly weak response of yours. 'Cops think they can get away with murder' is admittedly true in many cases, but generally they are NOT stupid enough to put that to the test in front of a gazillion witnesses. The inescapable conclusion that any reasonable person would draw is that death/murder is not something that Chauvin anticipated that his actions might result in. That death resulted at all is in all likelihood due heavily to Floyd's contribution, something that Chauvin could have no awareness of. The point is...you remember the point, don't you....is that Chauvin and his lawyers weren't looking for a plea deal based on his overwhelming guilt, but on the overwhelming likelihood of a conviction on all counts REGARDLESS of guilt or innocence.
And thanks for informing me that the media and rabble-rousers are always fired up, as if I needed that reminder. Let me remind YOU that the very thread we are posting this discussion on is titled ......
Is Mr. Floyd's Death Being Used To Change All Of Society?
There's a clue there regarding how intensely the media, both social and commercial, as well as political sources, have been working this over. I bet you still can't find it.The real jewel in your response though is "Also jury only needed to find that the kneeling was “substantial cause” of the death, not its sole cause. Makes sense to me." Of course it makes sense to you. What makes sense to me is that the jury was going to dig a hole and bury him in it even if the Pope had testified that he was giving Communion to Chauvin at the time of Floyd's death. Why? Because he had been convicted and all but hung in the media; and media-inflamed rioters were just itching to burn and loot long before the trial date was even set. What juror or jurors was going to be the one that said 'he didn't do it'?
and I'm better at this than YOU. THEREFOR, @chickenhunter is better at this than you also. Thanks for playing.
Not sure if there is but I have seen a connection with black people resisting arrest and getting shot.
maybe it correlates with being a Trump supporter and not being a liberal mushhead who gets all weepy whenever some black guy (but not some white guy) rolls the dice and comes up snake eyes. You rolls the dice, you takes your chances. Right?
Weird thing is the police kill more white people every year but I dont recall any riots and looting when white people are killed.
White people deserve to die. Just ask Chris Cuomo.
I wonder if there’s a correlation between poasting passive aggressive comments and menstruation.
You don't....and that's the problem when you pigeon hole people based on their beliefs. According to the left, simply because someone is a conservative and doesn't kowtow to the cries of the libs means they are white.
Only a racist would feel otherwise.
I bet you've heard that several times in your life.
Similar threads
