ADVERTISEMENT

Jesus Christ . .

I figured you'd go for the Gospel of Judas. ;) I like Phillip's take on things, personally.

The 27 books of the canonical New Testament were settled in Bishop Athanasius of Alexandria’s annual Easter letter (the 39th Festal Letter) in 367 C.E. It was once believed that this pronouncement, alongside his denouncement of the Christian apocrypha, was enough for believers to abandon all noncanonical texts.
I dunno how Judas could have written his Gospel... he was swinging from a tree the same day Jesus was crucified. Judas was symbolic in many ways. I learned that from further study. Judea and Israel are symbolic. In fact, it's helpful to know that the entire Bible is written by Jewish people. It's helpful to see it/read it/know it through a Jewish filter. It's much clearer to me now than it was before that.

It also helps to know that none of these people wrote their New Testament "books." Paul was the only literate contributor to the New Testament, and his epistles were by his hand... as far as we know. When you consider the centuries of separation from each gospel, it helps to put in perspective the presence of metaphor and allegory, and the need to fulfill prophecy. "My God, My God, why hast Thou forsaken me?" is directly from Psalms 22. Imagine that! The Gospels differ in very significant ways. From a present perspective, how could 4 accounts have different details?

And, as far as the "noncanonical" labels... that's even more convenience of what to include or exclude. I'm aware of the official meetings that determined what is allowed and what isn't. But, that doesn't mean that the texts that were left out are suddenly removed from view and consciousness. It just means some church people didn't feel like they could defend or denounce the texts. "Enough for believers...?" I guess believers is a very, VERY subjective term.

ETA:

And, "enough" is even more subjective!
 
Last edited:
I made a mistake about John, sorry. I was thinking of Revelation... written by John (or whoever wrote the actual book).

Ran away in shame isn't lurking in the shadows.

You can choose to stay where you are, or know something that you don't presently know. Your choice.
He wrote 5 books in the bible. Including Revelation
 
The Bible indeed teaches that when we die we either go to Heaven or Hell. Then, after the Millennial Kingdom, we all are called before the throne for the Final Judgement whereupon those found to be in sin will be cast into the Lake of Fire.
...not sure I follow this. My understanding is that Jesus taught that the ONLY way to heaven is through Him, belief in Him.

If we are judged on whether we have sinned - EVERY person who ever lived - every one (except Jesus) - is out of luck - hell bound because all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.

I don't believe - and the Bible doesn't state - that there is some scale or balance - and if you did more good things than bad in life, well that impresses God and you make the cut for heaven.

I believe the bible teaches that heaven is given by grace through faith in Jesus - and that true faith is shown by striving to live as He lived, and to live as He instructs us to live, especially in how we treat other humans on earth.
 
FWIW I enjoy this thread and agree that the best part about it is people can be civil and disagree / debate without resorting to immediate name-calling and savaging other posters. Refreshing.

Two things:
1) as a believer - for me the hardest thing to answer or understand is that if God created all in the world and has dominion over the devil, then why does He allow so many bad things (natural disasters, sickness, wars, hatred) to occur? To draw us all closer to Him in seeing our need for Him? That is so difficult for me to accept / understand. I think a primary error humans (including / especially me) make is to try to see the world and make sense of it and what God is doing in it, through our own HUMAN limited understanding of the world. I believe God's whole plan for humans and the world is not really fully understood by even the wisest human, but that He has told us how to live via messages in the bible.

2) as it pertains to the bible and its impact on worldly societies: I do believe the key messages at the heart of the bible (Ten Commandments, Golden Rule, Jesus's sermons, apostles' teachings) - are vital in what makes (or would make) life on Earth most meaningful, peaceful, just, loving. BUT - I think most people - Christians included - like me - struggle to consistently live their lives and how they treat others by following all these commands. If they did, the world would have so many fewer problems. If we were to ignore these commands as the basis for laws in our society, what sort of society would we have then? One based on the laws of man? If so, which man / men determine the laws of what is right? Man's law by nature is to hold power over other men, destroy them, abuse them, conquer them. That is at heart of slavery, bigotry, racism, socialism, communism.... inherent superiority of one man over another with no God in the picture. A secular humanist (human - worship) society historically has resulted in mass death, despair, poverty, hatred, human atrocities.
 
...not sure I follow this. My understanding is that Jesus taught that the ONLY way to heaven is through Him, belief in Him.

If we are judged on whether we have sinned - EVERY person who ever lived - every one (except Jesus) - is out of luck - hell bound because all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.

I don't believe - and the Bible doesn't state - that there is some scale or balance - and if you did more good things than bad in life, well that impresses God and you make the cut for heaven.

I believe the bible teaches that heaven is given by grace through faith in Jesus - and that true faith is shown by striving to live as He lived, and to live as He instructs us to live, especially in how we treat other humans on earth.

Faith alone will get you to Heaven, but keep in mind "no sin shall enter there". Sin is repugnant to God and He won't tolerate it in His presence. No one ever said getting there was easy.

(@strummingram...I use the masculine here because the Bible does)
 
He was considered the source of them, but he was not literate, himself personally. None of the Gospel authors were able to read and write. And, they certainly weren't bilingual.

https://ehrmanblog.org/was-john-the-son-of-zebedee-capable-of-writing-a-gospel/
It would be obvious that he had someone to record his words. The book of revelation was recorded on the island of patomos. History records the Roman's had plucked his eyes out. Naturally he would need help. Dictation or penning it your self makes no difference if coming from said author
 
It would be obvious that he had someone to record his words. The book of revelation was recorded on the island of patomos. History records the Roman's had plucked his eyes out. Naturally he would need help. Dictation or penning it your self makes no difference if coming from said author
I'm simply stating that he didn't write it. And, it wasn't written during his lifetime. It was likely written down about 90-100 AD. Johannine texts have been debated for about as long as the others. There are resemblances to each other (the 5 he is said to have "written"), but it's not for sure that John The Beloved was the actual source for all 5.

It doesn't really matter. Every person interprets everything uniquely. We've already seen several "believers" in this thread who are in conflict with who gets into heaven and how they get there and when the admission process is done. That's been my underlying point throughout this thread... it's all relative!

ETA: Collectively, we don't know. Individually, we think we know!
 
...not sure I follow this. My understanding is that Jesus taught that the ONLY way to heaven is through Him, belief in Him.

If we are judged on whether we have sinned - EVERY person who ever lived - every one (except Jesus) - is out of luck - hell bound because all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.

I don't believe - and the Bible doesn't state - that there is some scale or balance - and if you did more good things than bad in life, well that impresses God and you make the cut for heaven.

I believe the bible teaches that heaven is given by grace through faith in Jesus - and that true faith is shown by striving to live as He lived, and to live as He instructs us to live, especially in how we treat other humans on earth.
People before the law will be judged on conciousness. Knowing right from wrong. From moses to christ had the law.
King James Bible
What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet
Christ offers grace. Not to sin, but to keep the "middle man" out of it.(priest)
He paid the penalty for sin for all who will accept him. The sacrifices before Jesus, was not sufficient.

And by the law almost all things are purged with blood, and without shedding of blood there is no remission.
 
I'm simply stating that he didn't write it. And, it wasn't written during his lifetime. It was likely written down about 90-100 AD. Johannine texts have been debated for about as long as the others. There are resemblances to each other (the 5 he is said to have "written"), but it's not for sure that John The Beloved was the actual source for all 5.

It doesn't really matter. Every person interprets everything uniquely. We've already seen several "believers" in this thread who are in conflict with who gets into heaven and how they get there and when the admission process is done. That's been my underlying point throughout this thread... it's all relative!

ETA: Collectively, we don't know. Individually, we think we know!
If you were God, would you inspire and commission a book to give a way to make it to heaven? Even if it took thousands of years to complete. Or would you leave it up to the individual to make his own way, and no one know right or wrong or even if they are close to being right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Heelicious
If you were God, would you inspire and commission a book to give a way to make it to heaven? Even if it took thousands of years to complete. Or would you leave it up to the individual to make his own way, and no one know right or wrong or even if they are close to being right?
I am God. And, you are God. And, we are all experiencing the whole thing right now. It's all playing-out and will continue to be revealed and continue to evolve. We're all painting a stroke onto the giant canvas.

My experience doesn't include some perpetual after-party called Heaven, or an eternal damnation torture chamber called Hell. So, leaving a map to get to this place that you believe exists isn't on my list of things to to do. To me, Heaven and Hell are just polarities in a religious mythology that some people subscribe to so that they can play order against chaos in this life.

As God, I strive to forgive unconditionally. God has set the example for me to show, and share, and give unconditional love. No punishment, no reward, no judgement, just love. I'm getting there. I'm closer now than I was before.
 
(@strummingram...I use the masculine here because the Bible does)
Why does the Bible use the Masculine specific?

Refer to God as She, and Her and Mother for a year. I guarantee that your image of God will change.

Or, just for fun, change it to "Life". The way to the Life is through Me. No one comes to the Life except through me. Life's kingdom.

It's pretty amazing how just a word or two can reshape your understanding. It took me a while, but I am pretty solid on just saying God. Or, I will say just "You" in prayer and reflection. Sometimes, I even manage to bridge the gap and make it "Us!" I don't believe in the religious stipulation that we are separated from God, or the Source, or the Origin, or the Universe. It seems like many religions need their followers to believe that God is here, and we are separated from God and the only way to get BACK TO GOD is by following their rituals and incantations and behaviors. When, what you're really doing is following their rules and, meanwhile, God is in all of us, all of the time. God must be. Everything is part of God, and God is everything. Most religious people will even agree with that, by itself. But, then the details are where it gets more interesting.

I will offer this, with regard to what I call "the old way"; It got me where I am now, so I honor it for the step that it is/was along my path.
 
Lot of things being said as fact that cannot be proven. Nothing against anyone but just because your source says one thing does not make it so. I can show you another source that says just the opposite. Carry on.
Hard to discuss this with you when no one knows what you are referring to, (or at least I don't) . You might get some good input if you told what you are talking about.
 
Omnipotence is by definition the capacity for total control. An omnipotent being would have a moral obligation to prevent necessary suffering by any reasonable ethical standard. Or at the very least not create a universe that constantly facilitates that suffering. Indifference towards unnecessary suffering is immoral.

We care because we watch the harm done by religion on a daily basis, and feel the need to push back against a group that simultaneously maintains both a dominant majority of the population and a ridiculous persecution complex about how their faith is under attack by anyone who states an opinion or argument that contradicts that faith. I believe that religion is the most dangerous form of ideology human beings have ever created. Once you make the leap to believing in a god, you can claim that anything is the will of that god. And quite often people are convinced by those claims. So convinced that they are willing to do things like launching crusades, kidnapping and torturing gay teenagers, oppressing women, or flying planes into buildings. Its not an obsession to criticize religion. Its a perfectly justifiable ethical/moral argument. I never said I don't care about religion. I care quite a lot about the consequences of religious dogmatism.

Next time just quote me or tag me instead of taking underhanded shots that are clearly aimed at me or my arguments. I won't be offended. I was raised in a christian family. I understand faith quite well actually. I've read the bible cover to cover multiple times. Have you? Most christians haven't even come close to reading the entire source material for their own ideology. You don't want to talk about child cancer? Fine. What about great floods that drown every human child on the face of the planet? That story is taught to children without a second thought towards the basic logic and morality of its content. Children are taught every day that if they don't obey god's wishes, then they'll be tortured for eternity in hell fire. That's disgusting, and totally worthy of criticism.

I mean, I specifically mentioned omnipotence, which you referenced, so I assumed you would know it was directed at you. I've don't really care much about avoiding a confrontation on here nor been concerned with offending anyone.

Again, I feel that if you assign total control to faith like that you don't understand the meaning of what it truly is.

Look, I agree with a lot of what bothers you about religion. I would even say it may bother me more. One could counter that with all the good religion does as well of course but that is a simple answer as the counter to that isn't too difficult to formulate. I think many people who are religious are fanatical. People who are fanatical and crazy will something to be that way about. You are blaming the wrong thing IMO. I think it is just a way to justify crappy ****.

Pat Robertson is a good example of this.
 
I mean, I specifically mentioned omnipotence, which you referenced, so I assumed you would know it was directed at you. I've don't really care much about avoiding a confrontation on here nor been concerned with offending anyone.

Again, I feel that if you assign total control to faith like that you don't understand the meaning of what it truly is.

Look, I agree with a lot of what bothers you about religion. I would even say it may bother me more. One could counter that with all the good religion does as well of course but that is a simple answer as the counter to that isn't too difficult to formulate. I think many people who are religious are fanatical. People who are fanatical and crazy will something to be that way about. You are blaming the wrong thing IMO. I think it is just a way to justify crappy ****.

Pat Robertson is a good example of this.

Fair enough.

I'm not assigning anything to faith itself. I'm assigning total control to a supposed omnipotent being. And that's not a misrepresentation of christian metaphysics. I grew up in a christian household. Phrases like "everything is part of god's plan" get thrown around all the time. The christian bible claims that everything is designed by god. Earthquakes, tsunamis and disease can only exist if god allows them to exist. I don't think there's any way to refute that if you believe in an omnipotent god. Omnipotence means the power to do anything. Meaning anything that god doesn't do, involves a choice not to do it.

Religion doesn't do any good that people couldn't do without religion. All of the charity could be done without superstitious belief systems. All of the social structure could be provided without religion. I can't think of one good deed that a religious person can do, that a non-religious person couldn't. People often say that religion helps people through times of grief, but lying to people about how you know their loved ones are alive in heaven doesn't actually help anyone. And it cheapens the value of the only life we do get. There are many ways to find peace and happiness from secular philosophy.

I also disagree with your last point. There are certainly some people who are psycho/sociopathic and will look for some kind of belief system to justify their crazy behavior. But most of those people don't care about people justifying that behavior, which is what makes them anti-social. But what really concerns me are the otherwise ordinary people who behave in malicious ways as a consequence of believing in doctrines that are supposedly backed by an omnipotent and omniscient god. Ideas inform actions.

I'll use an example that doesn't hit quite so close to home for most people on this board. In the islamic world, all kinds of atrocities are committed in the name of beliefs in religious doctrine. Genital mutilation of children, oppression of women, oppression of gay folks, oppression of atheists/secular non-believers, and of course jihad. Apostasy isn't punishable by death because a bunch of crazy people want a way to justify their fanaticism. Its punishable by death because there are 1.3 billion muslims in the world, and a disturbingly huge percentage of them believe that is the law of allah. They fear that if they don't subject their sons and daughters to this horrible treatment then they will be punished for eternity by their god.

That's why religious morality will never be the optimal solution for any social issue. Dogma does not evolve, or respond to criticism. Secular laws do. Its taken secular law to beat religion into submission. The only reason that christians stopped burning "witches" at the stake is because the law made them stop. The only consequence for catholic priests who rape children comes from secular courts. And so on and so on.
 
Fair enough.

I'm not assigning anything to faith itself. I'm assigning total control to a supposed omnipotent being. And that's not a misrepresentation of christian metaphysics. I grew up in a christian household. Phrases like "everything is part of god's plan" get thrown around all the time. The christian bible claims that everything is designed by god. Earthquakes, tsunamis and disease can only exist if god allows them to exist. I don't think there's any way to refute that if you believe in an omnipotent god. Omnipotence means the power to do anything. Meaning anything that god doesn't do, involves a choice not to do it.

I think assigning total control to God in that way is absolutely misrepresenting what many of us believe. Allowing something bad to exist involves a choice we made, which is something a non-believer will never really attempt to understand. If God chose to do anything, to manipulate everything to his desire, no one would then have a choice at all. That would make everyone puppets, not people with anything remotely close to free will.

Religion doesn't do any good that people couldn't do without religion. All of the charity could be done without superstitious belief systems. All of the social structure could be provided without religion. I can't think of one good deed that a religious person can do, that a non-religious person couldn't. People often say that religion helps people through times of grief, but lying to people about how you know their loved ones are alive in heaven doesn't actually help anyone. And it cheapens the value of the only life we do get. There are many ways to find peace and happiness from secular philosophy.

Yes, that is the counter I referenced. Whether or not people could do something without belief isn't the point though. There is definitely peach and happiness outside of religion. I've never argued otherwise.

I also disagree with your last point. There are certainly some people who are psycho/sociopathic and will look for some kind of belief system to justify their crazy behavior. But most of those people don't care about people justifying that behavior, which is what makes them anti-social. But what really concerns me are the otherwise ordinary people who behave in malicious ways as a consequence of believing in doctrines that are supposedly backed by an omnipotent and omniscient god. Ideas inform actions.

I don't think those people exist. I don't think any reasonable person becomes a believer and then because of that loses their ****. I think belief sometimes exacerbates obsessive traits that were already present.

I'll use an example that doesn't hit quite so close to home for most people on this board. In the islamic world, all kinds of atrocities are committed in the name of beliefs in religious doctrine. Genital mutilation of children, oppression of women, oppression of gay folks, oppression of atheists/secular non-believers, and of course jihad. Apostasy isn't punishable by death because a bunch of crazy people want a way to justify their fanaticism. Its punishable by death because there are 1.3 billion muslims in the world, and a disturbingly huge percentage of them believe that is the law of allah. They fear that if they don't subject their sons and daughters to this horrible treatment then they will be punished for eternity by their god.

I'm not talking about raising someone as an extremist. I don't think anyone denies that is dangerous (nor exclusive to that religion).

That's why religious morality will never be the optimal solution for any social issue. Dogma does not evolve, or respond to criticism. Secular laws do. Its taken secular law to beat religion into submission. The only reason that christians stopped burning "witches" at the stake is because the law made them stop. The only consequence for catholic priests who rape children comes from secular courts. And so on and so on.
 
Fair enough.

I'm not assigning anything to faith itself. I'm assigning total control to a supposed omnipotent being. And that's not a misrepresentation of christian metaphysics. I grew up in a christian household. Phrases like "everything is part of god's plan" get thrown around all the time. The christian bible claims that everything is designed by god. Earthquakes, tsunamis and disease can only exist if god allows them to exist. I don't think there's any way to refute that if you believe in an omnipotent god. Omnipotence means the power to do anything. Meaning anything that god doesn't do, involves a choice not to do it.

I think assigning total control to God in that way is absolutely misrepresenting what many of us believe. Allowing something bad to exist involves a choice we made, which is something a non-believer will never really attempt to understand. If God chose to do anything, to manipulate everything to his desire, no one would then have a choice at all. That would make everyone puppets, not people with anything remotely close to free will.

Religion doesn't do any good that people couldn't do without religion. All of the charity could be done without superstitious belief systems. All of the social structure could be provided without religion. I can't think of one good deed that a religious person can do, that a non-religious person couldn't. People often say that religion helps people through times of grief, but lying to people about how you know their loved ones are alive in heaven doesn't actually help anyone. And it cheapens the value of the only life we do get. There are many ways to find peace and happiness from secular philosophy.

Yes, that is the counter I referenced. Whether or not people could do something without belief isn't the point though. There is definitely peach and happiness outside of religion. I've never argued otherwise.

I also disagree with your last point. There are certainly some people who are psycho/sociopathic and will look for some kind of belief system to justify their crazy behavior. But most of those people don't care about people justifying that behavior, which is what makes them anti-social. But what really concerns me are the otherwise ordinary people who behave in malicious ways as a consequence of believing in doctrines that are supposedly backed by an omnipotent and omniscient god. Ideas inform actions.

I don't think those people exist. I don't think any reasonable person becomes a believer and then because of that loses their ****. I think belief sometimes exacerbates obsessive traits that were already present.

I'll use an example that doesn't hit quite so close to home for most people on this board. In the islamic world, all kinds of atrocities are committed in the name of beliefs in religious doctrine. Genital mutilation of children, oppression of women, oppression of gay folks, oppression of atheists/secular non-believers, and of course jihad. Apostasy isn't punishable by death because a bunch of crazy people want a way to justify their fanaticism. Its punishable by death because there are 1.3 billion muslims in the world, and a disturbingly huge percentage of them believe that is the law of allah. They fear that if they don't subject their sons and daughters to this horrible treatment then they will be punished for eternity by their god.

I'm not talking about raising someone as an extremist. I don't think anyone denies that is dangerous (nor exclusive to that religion).

That's why religious morality will never be the optimal solution for any social issue. Dogma does not evolve, or respond to criticism. Secular laws do. Its taken secular law to beat religion into submission. The only reason that christians stopped burning "witches" at the stake is because the law made them stop. The only consequence for catholic priests who rape children comes from secular courts. And so on and so on.

I think you’re refusing to acknowledge what an omnipotent god actually is. Human choice doesn’t cause most genetic mutations in children or a vast majority of natural disasters. Claiming that every bad thing that happens is allowed to happen because of human choice is absurd. We know that human choice has no impact on a huge amount of suffering and disaster. You could still have free will in a universe where your own choices cause suffering, but suffering is not caused by natural phenomenon outside of human control. Claiming that someone who disagrees with you just isn’t trying to understand your faith suggests straw manning.

You really don’t think those people exists?... Millions of people in this country oppose gay marriage just because the Bible says that homosexuality is a sin. Are all of those people extremists just using Christianity as a justification for homophobia? I think not.

My point has nothing to do with raising someone as an extremist. Punishing apostasy and forcing women to wear a veil is not an extremist intreptation of the Quran. It’s entirely mainstream, BECAUSE an old book says it’s the law of god. Its the religious books like the Quran and the Bible that are extreme. People don’t choose to believe that stuff then look for a religion that will back them up. They believe in a religion that leaves them no choice if they want to adhere to codified doctrines of their religion. Just like Christians who oppose equal rights for gay folks. If you took those verses out of the Bible then most of them would not decide on their own to claim homosexuality is a sin.
 
Don’t even get me started on free will. We don’t actually have it. Genes write the code for hormones, which influence the behavior of neurons, which inform our decision. Free will simply doesn’t exist. Listen to some lectures from Professor Sapolsky at Stanford if you don’t want to take it from me. But even if it did exist, it would be constrained by a biological framework that determines personality and behavior. A framework that would have been designed by a god if there were actually a creator. If a god is creating human beings, then the behavior of those human beings still is the responsibility of the god that determines their nature. An omnipotent god leaves no room for freedom of choice. Claiming you have free will because the boss says you have free will is kinda silly IMO.
 
Ok, I am adding this scripture to this thread, since the popcorn thread morphed into a Christian debate.
This is for those who profess to be Christian's. For those who do not believe in Christ, we already know you feel it's a fable.

@heelbent or anyone else wondering, here is how one will know if they will make it to heaven or not. It's pretty cut and dry.

Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God. But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law.
Galatians 5:19‭-‬23 KJV
https://bible.com/bible/1/gal.5.19-23.KJV
 
I think you’re refusing to acknowledge what an omnipotent god actually is. Human choice doesn’t cause most genetic mutations in children or a vast majority of natural disasters. Claiming that every bad thing that happens is allowed to happen because of human choice is absurd. We know that human choice has no impact on a huge amount of suffering and disaster. You could still have free will in a universe where your own choices cause suffering, but suffering is not caused by natural phenomenon outside of human control. Claiming that someone who disagrees with you just isn’t trying to understand your faith suggests straw manning.

Ok, I don't think you aren't trying then. Just suggesting you don't understand nor want to, which is fine. That is kind of what faith is. I believe completely in bad things and good things happening because of natural selection and simply the way things work. I never claimed every bad thing that happens is by choice.

You really don’t think those people exists?... Millions of people in this country oppose gay marriage just because the Bible says that homosexuality is a sin. Are all of those people extremists just using Christianity as a justification for homophobia? I think not.

Someone who simply opposes that isn't an extremist. It isn't where I fall as a Christian but calling them extremists is pretty absurd. If that is how far apart we are there isn't any point in this tbh.

My point has nothing to do with raising someone as an extremist. Punishing apostasy and forcing women to wear a veil is not an extremist intreptation of the Quran. It’s entirely mainstream, BECAUSE an old book says it’s the law of god. Its the religious books like the Quran and the Bible that are extreme. People don’t choose to believe that stuff then look for a religion that will back them up. They believe in a religion that leaves them no choice if they want to adhere to codified doctrines of their religion. Just like Christians who oppose equal rights for gay folks. If you took those verses out of the Bible then most of them would not decide on their own to claim homosexuality is a sin.

Again, I feel like a lot of your issues with Christianity are based exclusively on this one issue. I get your POV here as I've had many of these conversations with Christians. It doesn't make them terrible people though. If you feel that way, just don't respond I guess because that sort of puts you right on the same level as those you seem to hate. We just aren't going to productively converse when that is the case. I mean, it isn't going anywhere anyway so has probably run its course.
 
Last edited:
Ok, I don't think you aren't trying then. Just suggesting you don't understand nor want to, which is fine. That is kind of what faith is. I believe completely in bad things and good things happening because of natural selection and simply the way things work. I never claimed every bad thing that happens is by choice.


Someone who simply opposes that isn't an extremist. It isn't where I fall as a Christian but calling them extremists is pretty absurd. If that is how far apart we are there isn't any point in this tbh.


Again, I feel like a lot of your issues with Christianity are based exclusively on this one issue. I get your POV here as I've had many of these conversations with Christians. It doesn't make them terrible people though. If you feel that way, just don't respond I guess because that sort of puts you right on the same level as those you seem to hate. We just aren't going to productively converse when that is the case. I mean, it isn't going anywhere anyway so has probably run its course.

I don't think you're engaging with any of the points I've actually made.

1. Natural selection in a world that was intelligently designed, is part of the design. Natural phenomenon would all come down to the engineering of the god that created the universe where said natural phenomenon occurs.

2. I didn't say that makes them extremists. I was literally making the point that religious doctrines are dangerous on their own, not just for extremists looking for justification for their obsessions. I'm making the case that the vast majority of people would not care about homosexuality, but they only do because the Bible tells them its a sin. Without that doctrine their would be no other justification for denying them basic human rights. I was literally making the case that they aren't extremists, they just believe in a stupid idea, because an old book told them that idea came from god himself.

3. You're clearly strawmanning me here. I have a long lists of issues with christianity and religion in general, and I've stated many of them. I never said that all christians are terrible people. So I can't even begin to imagine where you're taking that from. Criticizing ideas is totally different than hating people. The vast majority of people who are oppressed by religious doctrine, are religious themselves. The biggest victims of Islamism, are Muslim women. Like I said, you're simply not engaging with any of my actual points, because its easier to just make false equivalencies and straw man me. Nothing I've posted here suggests that I hate anyone. It should suggest that I hate particular ideas, and the notion of justifying those ideas with the religious force of claiming they are backed by god.

My argument is a simple one. Ideas inform actions. And when you convince someone that they should believe in terrible ideas, because god said so, then you will inevitably end up with worse behavior than you would get from secular logic. Their is no valid logical justification for oppressing gay folks, women, or apostates. Only religious dogma can do that. And it works through codified doctrines that are supposedly the word of god.

If you don't want to discuss/debate religion with me then that's perfectly fine. We don't have to continue. But its a little irritating to hear someone repeatedly straw man your arguments and claim that "you just don't want to understand" while they simultaneously misrepresent your arguments.

"Religion is an insult to human dignity. With or without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion." - Steven Weinberg

This is the point that concerns me. Ordinary people who are not psychopaths, being convinced to do evil things because they believe that god wants them to do it. How many daughters were stoned to death throughout human history for not being virgins on their wedding night? How many muslim women have had acid thrown in their faces for showing too much hair in public? How many gay men have been thrown from the rooftops of buildings for the nature of their sexual preference? Its easy for us to dismiss this from afar... but things like this still happen all around the world, for exclusively religious reasons. Its not the only reason why people commit atrocities, but for many people, it is the only reason.
 
Last edited:
Jesus-672x372.jpg
 
It's amazing how many people DON'T believe in God until they're at the moment of death. Never hear about deathbed 'unconversions' o_O

We all believe in something. To each his own.
 
It's amazing how many people DON'T believe in God until they're at the moment of death. Never hear about deathbed 'unconversions' o_O

We all believe in something. To each his own.

What's disgusting is the fact that religion plays on people's fear of death, and lies to them about how they'll live forever if they just believe in a fairy tale.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT