XLance is ancient, as am I. We were around for great UNC RBs and OLs and Ds.
I am almost ancient Woad.
I am also a 40+ year member of the Rams Club
I think XLance is wrong about Jeff Moncken. Tar Heels fans will not be excited to have a triple option coach, which means even if we start averaging 9 wins per year, attendance problems will remain.
But XLance is correct that the measures to improve attendance under Bubba have not worked and will not work.
Even when we were coming off an 11 win season, we had growing attendance issues. One obvious fact from that is: even when Fedora wins in double digits (which at UNC is no more than once every 8 years), he does not excite and inspire UNC fans.
The take away? Fedora must be replaced, properly, with the right guy, for anything else to work toward improving attendance.
Woad our attendance problems started with the "equity seating plan".
In an attempt stimulate Rams Club contributions the ESP was born. Up until then as long as you renewed your season tickets, you could keep the same seats. When the plan started, the best seats were sold off to those with the most points. Many of the best seats were legacy seats, second generation holders living off of first generation contributions
Got to agree. Reminds me of the Duke posts in another thread. GT and Duke (with Cut) seem to have a ceiling of 7 or 8 wins. Right now that looks really good but we need a higher ceiling. I believe you need to run some type of spread to have a higher ceiling - unless you have an exceptional D.
I don't post on this board very often as my interests are mainly focused on realignment. But I do see people talk about the "recruiting restrictions" that we have to deal with.
We could have had a national championship caliber program with Butch Davis. Because of "circumstances" we will not have that opportunity for quite some time. The PTB will only allow minimal acceptance of folks that don't fit our admissions profile. This is not a unique problem in the ACC. Duke, Georgia Tech, Wake Forest, Boston College and UVa all have the same problem. Notre Dame does too, but their status in football allows them to recruit on a different level (similar to what we can do in basketball) than other academically restricted football programs.
Realistically our ceiling is 7-9 games. Bubba has attempted to get us there by dumbing down our schedule and hiring a coach to play gimmick football.
What we need is our own David Cutcliff or Dave Clawson who can take less than elite players and develop a team. Over a period of time their success will allow them to recruit better and better players (see Duke).
Consistent success with a competitive schedule will put people in the stands.
There is no quick fix or magic bullet, we would have to open the gate and lower the bar to get those players in immediately and we just can't recruit that way under the current circumstances. And you will not get elite players until you can prove success (see Clemson).
We will need someone who has ties our recruiting area that can talk like the high school coaches and players in a voice that is not foreign (Dabo) to start to rebuild recruiting relationships.
Bubba's experiment has cost us the last 7 years plus at least another 4-6 more even after a good hire.