says a lot about georgia’s motivation…i’ve seen alabama lose those bowl games to undermanned opponents as well.
I don't think opt outs were caused by the CFP. It's just a natural evolution. If anything caused it, it was the mass expansion of bowl games.Well we wanted a cfp and we got it. What we, or at least I, didn’t anticipate is that it’s rendered the other bowl games even more irrelevant than they already were. Players opting out of meaningless games played on weird days. Oh for the good old days of sitting down on New Year’s Day to a steady stream of marquee matchups on different channels in front of big crowds with big names. Team and Player success was measured by how they did n bowl games. We didn’t realize how good we had it. Plus we could argue all year over who was the legit national champ.
Yea that’s certainly part of it. But prior to cfp there wouldn’t be any players opting out of a new years bowl (or used to be new years) between two top ten teams. Those “second tier” bowls especially have become totally meaningless. I know technically they were meaningless before but there was just lots more value attached to them it seemed.I don't think opt outs were caused by the CFP. It's just a natural evolution. If anything caused it, it was the mass expansion of bowl games.
No one ever "opted out" of ANY bowl game back then.Yea that’s certainly part of it. But prior to cfp there wouldn’t be any players opting out of a new years bowl (or used to be new years) between two top ten teams. Those “second tier” bowls especially have become totally meaningless. I know technically they were meaningless before but there was just lots more value attached to them it seemed.
I think it's more an outgrowth of the increasing attitude that it's about the players individually, more so than it being about the schools and teams. It's exactly what you might expect when NIL came into play. That in particular signaled that the schools were losing their grip and the players were gaining the same.I don't think opt outs were caused by the CFP. It's just a natural evolution. If anything caused it, it was the mass expansion of bowl games.
I do remember, very well. Do you remember the year (1966?) that #1 ND and #2 Michigan State were studded with monster football players like Bubba Smith and played late in the season to a 10-10 tie? They were split in the polls after the season.Remember the two polls? Ap and the coaches. Sometimes they had different champs.
I remember I think bama and USC splitting a title as well. My bama cousins were in an uproar.I do remember, very well. Do you remember the year (1966?) that #1 ND and #2 Michigan State were studded with monster football players like Bubba Smith and played late in the season to a 10-10 tie? They were split in the polls after the season.
Many people would be disgusted by that but I think it's perfect.
I see the CFP as decent entertainment, but if the goal is to establish who the best football team is, the poll system worked as well as anything and better than a playoff.
I remember that. He did run it well. Damn that team had some talent. Wasn’t that the last time we won the acc?we ran some option when Scott Stankavage was our QB. I was amazed at how perfectly he could run it, both on the decision part and on the execution part.
don't axe me, CRS.I remember that. He did run it well. Damn that team had some talent. Wasn’t that the last time we won the acc?
Regardless, FSU was gonna get crushed without Travis. Beat Louisville 16-6 pre opt-outs, but Louisville got whooped 42-28 by defenseless USC...Over 20 FSU players either opted out or transferred. That's a ridiculous amount of players.
I doubt they get crushed. Their D was legit before the opt outsRegardless, FSU was gonna get crushed without Travis. Beat Louisville 16-6 pre opt-outs, but Louisville got whooped 42-28 by defenseless USC...
Chizik and Cross are gone.
No one ever "opted out" of ANY bowl game back then.
I hope it's someone more exciting than Chip Lindsey.
I think I've said this before, but if UNC football holds true to form, then the defense will improve to rank somewhere between 40-50. But the offense will fall off, so we still win 7-8 games. Then everyone beats their head on the table knowing that if the defense could have been that "good" the last few years, we would have won 10-11 games.Maybe he’s bad, Bad would be an improvement
well here's the other thing...if the defense had been that good, the offense would have fallen off...so we still would have won 7-8 games.I think I've said this before, but if UNC football holds true to form, then the defense will improve to rank somewhere between 40-50. But the offense will fall off, so we still win 7-8 games. Then everyone beats their head on the table knowing that if the defense could have been that "good" the last few years, we would have won 10-11 games.
And longo will have some obscure schools offense in the top 10I think I've said this before, but if UNC football holds true to form, then the defense will improve to rank somewhere between 40-50. But the offense will fall off, so we still win 7-8 games. Then everyone beats their head on the table knowing that if the defense could have been that "good" the last few years, we would have won 10-11 games.
He isn't really a no name hire.Chizik was a household name and he sucked. So maybe we're working on an opposite plan here. No-name hire that does great. Hope springs eternal!
compared to Chizik back then, i disagree.He isn't really a no name hire.
Other than the helmet, they look like a practice uni that you could find at any high school in the country.Michigan has the best uniforms in football!
Those things are sweet!
Michigan has the best uniforms in football!
Those things are sweet!