I would like it, but I doubt the old people will.Super unpopular opinion time.....
I think it would be cool for one game if we went with the above combo for basketball. Navy shorts, navy top, Carolina blue numbers with the heavy white outline. That white outline really makes the navy and Carolina blue pop IMO.
My favorite color is green. I think Carolina should wear green uniforms on occasion.
Nope I LOVE the 4-team playoff. It's an amazing publicity generator for college football. It isn't going anywhere for a long, long time.Please let this be the year that the four team playoff fukks everybody over. Definitely a lot of games left and there will most likely be some upsets but Lots of talk about the following teams getting in: UGA, Bama, ND, and then one of the other four Big5 conference winners. How glorious would that be for three conference winners to get screwed? I would love it so Then maybe we finally get a 6 or 8 team playoff where all the conference champs get in.
Nope I LOVE the 4-team playoff. It's an amazing publicity generator for college football. It isn't going anywhere for a long, long time.
I say Let all the conference winners in the playoffs and either 1 or 3 wildcards. More money, more interest from other fans like me. I haven't even watched the last few years because I'm sick of seeing the same damn teams every year.
Nope. I Gave up on that years ago. It's extremely Boring to me.You must not be a big fan of the NBA either.
The problem with your plan is it directly attacks the very thing that makes college football such a big draw:I say Let all the conference winners in the playoffs and either 1 or 3 wildcards. More money, more interest from other fans like me. I haven't even watched the last few years because I'm sick of seeing the same damn teams every year.
If anyone gets screwed, I hope it's ND. If that happens to them enough then they will be forced to join the ACC so they can win a championship.Please let this be the year that the four team playoff fukks everybody over. Definitely a lot of games left and there will most likely be some upsets but Lots of talk about the following teams getting in: UGA, Bama, ND, and then one of the other four Big5 conference winners. How glorious would that be for three conference winners to get screwed? I would love it so Then maybe we finally get a 6 or 8 team playoff where all the conference champs get in.
The same would be true in a single-game elimination post-season tournament. See: Division I FCS, Division II, and Division III NCAA Football.The problem with your plan is it directly attacks the very thing that makes college football such a big draw:
Every game is a must-win.
The same Bill Hancock, executive director of the BCS, who was adamant in every media appearance he did that a 4-team playoff would never happen. More games = more money. Period. He already figured this out once, but just like the last time he's letting the process drag to give the appearance that it's really about the kids. Pffft.Bill Hancock, the executive director of the College Football Playoff has been adamant on every radio appearance he has done that the 4-team playoff is not changing.
But don't you know there will be a nuclear meltdown if 3 conferences are left out? Let's say Clemson gets in, but osu, Oklahoma are both 12-1 conference champs and get left out. The big10, big12 will freak out.The problem with your plan is it directly attacks the very thing that makes college football such a big draw:
Every game is a must-win.
That simple but powerful narrative is what makes college football so strong and such an enticing watch. No other sport in the world can boast such a claim. With the playoffs, now it's sorta "every game is a must-win but you may be able to get away with losing one game," but still, it's a powerful draw.
Shifting it to all 5 P5 conference winners and 3 wildcards really cheapens the product. And ADs, college presidents, and the CFP organization understand this. Bill Hancock, the executive director of the College Football Playoff has been adamant on every radio appearance he has done that the 4-team playoff is not changing.
But don't you know there will be a nuclear meltdown if 3 conferences are left out? Let's say Clemson gets in, but osu, Oklahoma are both 12-1 conference champs and get left out. The big10, big12 will freak out.
It doesn't have to be 8; 6 would be good with me. And the conf champ must at least be in the top 10 of the rankings (or some requirement along those lines) so that if somehow a 5-3 coastal winner wins the ACC, with an overall record is 8-5, they wouldn't qualify.
Strongly disagree with all of you. 4-team playoff is perfect. Only change I would sign off on is adding a 5th team and the #1 seed gets a bye.
I don’t understand this logic.The problem with your plan is it directly attacks the very thing that makes college football such a big draw:
Every game is a must-win.
That simple but powerful narrative is what makes college football so strong and such an enticing watch. No other sport in the world can boast such a claim. With the playoffs, now it's sorta "every game is a must-win but you may be able to get away with losing one game," but still, it's a powerful draw.
Shifting it to all 5 P5 conference winners and 3 wildcards really cheapens the product. And ADs, college presidents, and the CFP organization understand this. Bill Hancock, the executive director of the College Football Playoff has been adamant on every radio appearance he has done that the 4-team playoff is not changing.
I say Let all the conference winners in the playoffs and either 1 or 3 wildcards. More money, more interest from other fans like me. I haven't even watched the last few years because I'm sick of seeing the same damn teams every year.
The problem with your plan is it directly attacks the very thing that makes college football such a big draw:
Every game is a must-win.
That simple but powerful narrative is what makes college football so strong and such an enticing watch. No other sport in the world can boast such a claim. With the playoffs, now it's sorta "every game is a must-win but you may be able to get away with losing one game," but still, it's a powerful draw.
Shifting it to all 5 P5 conference winners and 3 wildcards really cheapens the product. And ADs, college presidents, and the CFP organization understand this. Bill Hancock, the executive director of the College Football Playoff has been adamant on every radio appearance he has done that the 4-team playoff is not changing.
The current format encourages (at least one) high-caliber OOC schedule as well. Look at Wisconsin. They could go undefeated this year and still might not make the playoff because their schedule is so bad.Having an automatic route into the playoff by winning your conference would also encourage even more big time OOC matchups early in the season because losing wouldn't ruin a teams chances of winning their conference, but would still be a possible resume builder for an at large bid.
The current format encourages (at least one) high-caliber OOC schedule as well. Look at Wisconsin. They could go undefeated this year and still might not make the playoff because their schedule is so bad.
Nope. I Gave up on that years ago. It's extremely Boring to me.
The current format encourages (at least one) high-caliber OOC schedule as well. Look at Wisconsin. They could go undefeated this year and still might not make the playoff because their schedule is so bad.
Not really. An 8-team system like y'all are proposing would come with 3 wildcards. That would discourage tough OOC scheduling even more because teams would want to load up on wins.Agreed. But the system we're talking about would encourage to load up on big OOC games because the experience of playing top level teams would improve their chances of going on to win their conference.
Not really. An 8-team system like y'all are proposing would come with 3 wildcards. That would discourage tough OOC scheduling even more because teams would want to load up on wins.
Exactly. There is no reasonable argument against playoff expansion unless you're a closet Alabama fan.If that doesn't work with the selection committee now, then why would it work then?
Truth.There is no reasonable argument against playoff expansion unless you're a closet Alabama fan.
Five years ago the national title game was a rematch of a game that had already been decided in the regular season. Spare me that awful rationale.Y'all have your opinion. I have mine. To me, going beyond 4 cheapens the regular season, and that's college football's strength.
Five years ago the national title game was a rematch of a game that had already been decided in the regular season. Spare me that awful rationale.
Yes. I don't really know what his example was supposed to prove.Wasn't that under the old BCS format? Not the playoff that exists now.
And?Wasn't that under the old BCS format? Not the playoff that exists now.
It proves that arguments for the sanctity of the regular season are hollow. Not surprised that was lost on you.Yes. I don't really know what his example was supposed to prove.
And?
It proves that arguments for the sanctity of the regular season are hollow. Not surprised that was lost on you.
16 would be WAY too many. I'm only in favor of 6 or 8 (at the very most).Why do you think Jim Harbaugh is campaigning for a 16-team playoff? Because his teams at Michigan have lost 2-3 games each year he's been there, and he hasn't made the playoff under the current system.