ADVERTISEMENT

OOTB's Political Thread . ..

You made it up. Or got it from some bullshit, religious far right publication.

I suspect in the past many gay men were desperate to rid themselves of homosexuality and force themselves to have children in an attempt to be 'straight'. Nothing you say matches up to real life or actual evidence. Nothing.


Yup, as I suspected. You don't know a damn thing about trans people. The only insane person here is you.
Why don't you bother to look at real studies?

For example, this pro-trans article (not endorsing everything) at least admits this:

" On average 80% of children change their minds and do not continue into adulthood as transgender. "

You can find reasonable, scientific estimates as high as 90 plus percent, and one of the leading trans-doctors in the world has publicly stated a number of 70% including adults, not just children, and of course, I already showed you that right here on this forum.

 
R.dc430c1408a86234b85b0e9f0e7afa6e




See, from where I sit, you're the vile one for not wanting people to get the help they deserve. Actually trying to prevent them from getting the therapy they need. I get it though. What I'm suggesting is actual real work to help improve an individual's life and society as a whole. Your way just gives the perception of you caring. It's the lazy way out, which is the hallmark of your generation.



Lol. I need you to teach me something like I need a hole in the head. Hahahaha. I'm sorry, that's hilarious. Give me a minute....


And yes, as stated above, I'm shitting on you and your disregard for the mental health of those suffering. Instead of trying to help them, you want to affirm their mental disorder. Why do you hate people with mental disorders? People are truly suffering and you are trying your hardest to keep them suffering. It's bizarre and if your generation was any smarter, they'd pick up on your phony virtue signaling and see it for what it is - you caring more about others' opinion of you than you do for those actually suffering from the mental disorders that you're virtue signaling about.


Ok, now I understand why this is such a hot button issue for you. You know, I never believed that story you told us all about your previous girlfriend. I always thought of it as one of those "asking for a friend" situations.



If that's true, which I don't believe, we will not go quietly. Truth matters and I and millions of others will not sit idly by while you prevent help for those suffering and attempt to redefine what humans have always known.

See you next time, Sport.
These studies always show the same thing, for decades. This is pro-gay and inaccurate in their claims of how many studies have been done but nonetheless.

" It’s contrary to all reason, but it's true. Lesbians have significantly higher pregnancy rates than their heterosexual peers. It’s also true for teen gay males. They are substantially more likely to impregnate their sexual partners than are heterosexual males."

" Only one study to date has examined the pregnancy rates of adult sexual-minority women who are eighteen to forty-four years old. Published late last year, it reveals the same thing: unintended pregnancies are higher among sexual-minority women than their heterosexual peers. Their proportion for ending pregnancies by abortion is double that of heterosexual women."

Dozens of studies have been done actually and for decades.

 
Lots of people said years ago that Trump was going to be trouble for this country. I didn't realize he'd be trouble for OTHER countries too.

So other country's nuke secrets were at mar-a-lago, names of spies (including foreigners) too.

Is Trump defense claiming he declassified another country's nuke secrets? What else might have been in the empty folks in his office (rather than storage)?

 
  • Haha
Reactions: gunslingerdick
We're humans. Procreation is not the sole purpose of our existence and hasn't been for awhile.
well, this is interesting. What IS the purpose of our existence here of late? And how did the change from our previous purpose come about?
 
Why don't you bother to look at real studies?

For example, this pro-trans article (not endorsing everything) at least admits this:

" On average 80% of children change their minds and do not continue into adulthood as transgender. "

You can find reasonable, scientific estimates as high as 90 plus percent, and one of the leading trans-doctors in the world has publicly stated a number of 70% including adults, not just children, and of course, I already showed you that right here on this forum.

You, Gun, and Blueboy are three sick fvck.
 
well, this is interesting. What IS the purpose of our existence here of late? And how did the change from our previous purpose come about?

I mean, we aren’t as defined by it like other animals. Millions of people in this world don’t have children. Are they less human because of that?
 
First I laughed when Sarah Palin got whipped by a Democrat in a special election to fill Alaska's House Seat for the remainder of the year. Not only was this supposed to be Palin's political comeback but it also ends a 49-year run of the GOP holding the seat.

But I laughed even harder when the Republican bellyachers predictably enough came out of the woodwork bitching and moaning about "an unfair election." Where have we heard that before?

Palin herself called the ranked-choice ballots a "new crazy, convoluted, confusing” system, even though Alaskan voters overwhelmingly voted to implement the new voting system back in 2020. Also worth mentioning is that the majority of registered voters in Alaska are roughly 65% Republican.

Is this what we should expect from now on whenever a Republican loses an election?
 
These studies always show the same thing, for decades. This is pro-gay and inaccurate in their claims of how many studies have been done but nonetheless.

" It’s contrary to all reason, but it's true. Lesbians have significantly higher pregnancy rates than their heterosexual peers. It’s also true for teen gay males. They are substantially more likely to impregnate their sexual partners than are heterosexual males."

" Only one study to date has examined the pregnancy rates of adult sexual-minority women who are eighteen to forty-four years old. Published late last year, it reveals the same thing: unintended pregnancies are higher among sexual-minority women than their heterosexual peers. Their proportion for ending pregnancies by abortion is double that of heterosexual women."

Dozens of studies have been done actually and for decades.


I appreciate it when you share your sources. They always help reveal the culprit in your antiquated, archaic rhetoric and ideologies. These sources you frequent are ALWAYS totally off-the-frigging-reservation! They're propaganda and fear-driven far-right wackos.

Being afraid of trans people is quite a cottage industry! But, this one has a long list of stuff to be afraid of and ways to thwart the evil nemeses that threaten what's left of the white religious people in America.
 
  • Like
Reactions: carolinablue34
I mean, we aren’t as defined by it like other animals. Millions of people in this world don’t have children. Are they less human because of that?
you didn't answer the question but that's OK, I knew you couldn't. I hope you know you're moving out of your lane here. People without children are no less human nor are they any less animals. They have the same purpose that they've always had, which in general and biologically speaking is to procreate in order to further the species. Just because they didn't produce offspring doesn't mean they weren't compelled to do what causes it.

Humans just happen to have the luxury of being able to sidestep Mother Nature in the procreation department.

ETA: probably should have added that the above is from the biological standpoint. In actuality, we don't have to have a purpose and probably don't have a purpose. We just are. If we don't have or HAVE to have some purpose, what does it matter what we are? We can be what we want and make the most of it within limits.

We are where we are because of survival instincts. Those instincts don't go away just because we aren't too much worried anymore about being killed and eaten by a leopard in our sleep. They cause us to be leery of what isn't the usual circumstance, that is, what isn't normal or what isn't operating in a normal manner. Those who are not of the norm have to have the intelligence to know that we can't turn the 'human nature switch' off because there isn't one. We learn to accept things that are not the norm but might never be completely comfortable with them. That's just the way it is and no amount of pleading or whining or arguing is going to make us not be human beings with a human nature.

When you start talking about purposes you have to talk about what we are, and we are animals that have evolved over a very long time to survive and procreate. We wouldn't be here if not for that. Our instincts make us consider endeavors not to that end as excess baggage. Happily though, we have developed societies where excess baggage isn't really excessive or undesirable. That's because in such societies, everyone is just baggage since the basic 'survive and produce offspring' motive is diminished. But human nature is still there, strong as ever.

Those who are not of the norm might try to stop demanding acceptance and accommodation but rather accommodate themselves to the majority if they want to become of the norm. Those who demand that we accept what isn't normal can go fvck themselves. Our society has laws that protect ourselves from each other and we should feel damn lucky to have those. Telling us what we have to like is a step into the dystopia that so many are unwittingly trying to create.

No thanks.
 
Last edited:
We learn to accept things that are not the norm but might never be completely comfortable with them. That's just the way it is and no amount of pleading or whining or arguing is going to make us not be human beings with a human nature.


Those who are not of the norm might try to stop demanding acceptance and accommodation but rather accommodate themselves to the majority if they want to become of the norm. Those who demand that we accept what isn't normal can go fvck themselves.

Good poast in general but the two above quoted parts are the Cliff's Notes to my full sentiments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bluetoe
you didn't answer the question but that's OK, I knew you couldn't. I hope you know you're moving out of your lane here. People without children are no less human nor are they any less animals. They have the same purpose that they've always had, which in general and biologically speaking is to procreate in order to further the species. Just because they didn't produce offspring doesn't mean they weren't compelled to do what causes it.

Humans just happen to have the luxury of being able to sidestep Mother Nature in the procreation department.

ETA: probably should have added that the above is from the biological standpoint. In actuality, we don't have to have a purpose and probably don't have a purpose. We just are. If we don't have or HAVE to have some purpose, what does it matter what we are? We can be what we want and make the most of it within limits.

We are where we are because of survival instincts. Those instincts don't go away just because we aren't too much worried anymore about being killed and eaten by a leopard in our sleep. They cause us to be leery of what isn't the usual circumstance, that is, what isn't normal or what isn't operating in a normal manner. Those who are not of the norm have to have the intelligence to know that we can't turn the 'human nature switch' off because there isn't one. We learn to accept things that are not the norm but might never be completely comfortable with them. That's just the way it is and no amount of pleading or whining or arguing is going to make us not be human beings with a human nature.

When you start talking about purposes you have to talk about what we are, and we are animals that have evolved over a very long time to survive and procreate. We wouldn't be here if not for that. Our instincts make us consider endeavors not to that end as excess baggage. Happily though, we have developed societies where excess baggage isn't really excessive or undesirable. That's because in such societies, everyone is just baggage since the basic 'survive and produce offspring' motive is diminished. But human nature is still there, strong as ever.

Those who are not of the norm might try to stop demanding acceptance and accommodation but rather accommodate themselves to the majority if they want to become of the norm. Those who demand that we accept what isn't normal can go fvck themselves. Our society has laws that protect ourselves from each other and we should feel damn lucky to have those. Telling us what we have to like is a step into the dystopia that so many are unwittingly trying to create.

No thanks.
Sir NyQuil strikes again! He used 496 words and said absolutely nothing.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz . . .
 
Last edited:
Sir NyQuil strikes again! He used 496 words and said absolutely nothing.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz . . .
lol, and your stupid ass actually counted the words in a post you deem insignificant and then announce that you actually are incapable of basic comprehension. The funniest part is that you think you have made ME look foolish.
 
lol, and your stupid ass actually counted the words in a post you deem insignificant and then announce that you actually are incapable of basic comprehension. The funniest part is that you think you have made ME look foolish.
I didn’t sit there and count the words, you long-winded blowhard. I simply guesstimated. However, I just copied and pasted them into a Word document and it turns out you actually used 965 words to blabber about nothing of relevance, so I was pretty close.
 
I didn’t sit there and count the words, you long-winded blowhard. I simply guesstimated. However, I just copied and pasted them into a Word document and it turns out you actually used 965 words to blabber about nothing of relevance, so I was pretty close.
LOL, you think it makes it better that you only guesstimated the number of words in a post you want to say is insignificant? It was significant enough to rattle your chains, wasn't it? And you read it just to say it isn't relevant, and not to glean anything from it. You're just throwing your usual insecure little spitballs at the messenger and not the message. You know what's really insignificant? The insecure dolt who finds it necessary to explain his word count....the BDS sufferer that I'm responding to.
 
Wait, you guessed it was 496 and it was actually 965, a difference of 469? That's almost double or 50% off in your guess. If you call that "pretty close", I now understand many of your posts.
Pardon the typo. 465 words, a difference of only 31 words.
 
I appreciate it when you share your sources. They always help reveal the culprit in your antiquated, archaic rhetoric and ideologies. These sources you frequent are ALWAYS totally off-the-frigging-reservation! They're propaganda and fear-driven far-right wackos.

Being afraid of trans people is quite a cottage industry! But, this one has a long list of stuff to be afraid of and ways to thwart the evil nemeses that threaten what's left of the white religious people in America.
Typical dodging the facts on your part to back Groomers and help exploit the vulnerable.
 
It was significant enough to rattle your chains, wasn't it? And you read it just to say it isn't relevant, and not to glean anything from it.
Oh, yeah, my chains are just a-rattlin', whatever the hell that is supposed to mean. Is it anything like "amscray" or "23 skidoo" from your old-time slang lingo? And no, I did not read your idiotic post. If I want to read something that long I'll read Tolstoy instead.

Do you even know what copy and paste is or how it works, Monsieur Dinosaur? Is this the computer model you're working at right now:
cw_evolution_of_the_macintosh_02-100771325-orig.jpg

🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
 
Last edited:
Oh, yeah, my chains are just a-rattlin', whatever the hell that is supposed to mean. Is it anything like "amscray" or "23 skidoo" from your old-time slang lingo? And no, I did not read your idiotic post. If I want to read something that long I'll read Tolstoy instead.

Do you even know what copy and paste is or how it works, Monsieur Dinosaur? Is this the computer model you're working at right now:
cw_evolution_of_the_macintosh_02-100771325-orig.jpg

🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣

^^^^^triggered. Too easy. BDS isn't pretty.
 
Pardon the typo. 465 words, a difference of only 31 words.
^^^^^^^ rattled, making stupid mistakes, rationalizing for no reason other than his insecurity.

BDS is a terrible thing..


and apparently he DID count the words, but he can't count past some low number without losing the count. So dweebish.
 
Lame-ass comebacks. Being the angriest man in America must be a terrible thing.
^^^^^^now he's projecting and it's so obvious he's completely triggered. The fun thing is I could string him along all day because of his deep insecurities. But I have better things to do.

Good luck with the BDS. Har har.
 
First I laughed when Sarah Palin got whipped by a Democrat in a special election to fill Alaska's House Seat for the remainder of the year. Not only was this supposed to be Palin's political comeback but it also ends a 49-year run of the GOP holding the seat.

But I laughed even harder when the Republican bellyachers predictably enough came out of the woodwork bitching and moaning about "an unfair election." Where have we heard that before?

Palin herself called the ranked-choice ballots a "new crazy, convoluted, confusing” system, even though Alaskan voters overwhelmingly voted to implement the new voting system back in 2020. Also worth mentioning is that the majority of registered voters in Alaska are roughly 65% Republican.

Is this what we should expect from now on whenever a Republican loses an election?
Yes. They're all playing a victim card. If they lose an election they're the victim of fraud, deep state antics, chinese groomers, etc.
 
Yes. They're all playing a victim card. If they lose an election they're the victim of fraud, deep state antics, chinese groomers, etc.

Chinese groomers? We don't need them. We have plenty of our own.

And the Chinese aren't groomers. They want to remain a strong presence. They would never emasculate their own male children. But I'm sure they're happy to watch us do it.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT