No, I simply state things for what they are. At least I do my best. I'm not without bias to be sure. But I am not blinded by the hubris of my own leanings when it comes to politics.
You've been blinded into believing or partially giving credence to claims that are simply not true. And you'll go to any lengths to defend them because they represent your interests. Because somehow, a liberal democratic state is in opposition to everything you stand for.
Supposedly. Or am I wrong?
right, you are wrong. I didn't call you a knee-jerk liberal for no reason. I don't doubt that you think you're stating things for what they are, but that isn't the case many times, and you severely overstate things that support your agenda, to the point of shrill protest in many cases.
Consider when you claimed repeatedly that abortions due to careless disregard for protection were the exception rather than the rule, and I was claiming the opposite. My purpose was to support tighter abortion laws and regs because it would tend to promote greater responsibility in that regard. You were purely screeching about the 'outrageous' rejection of RvW and all its ramifications.. Then because someone else on your side of things linked to a paper put out by some official entity about a related topic, I read the entire paper and lo and behold, it contained a complete breakdown of reasons for abortions....and guess what? I was right in a big way, the large majority of abortions were due not to rape or incest or ectopic pregnancy or any of that stuff you claimed, but simply as a backup to not having used some form of protection (or failed protection, just to be clear).
I posted it in the midst of a discussion that you were part of. I don't remember if I did so in a reply to you, but you must have seen it as well as my ensuing comments on it. What have I heard from you as a response? Nothing.
I am one-sided in many areas and I make no bones about it. But I either know what I'm talking about or I keep my mouth shut. When you say otherwise, it's YOUR bias overriding the reality of it all. You are often emotional beyond reason.
I hate the current state of affairs for what they are, and I blame the left for the current state of affairs. You can consider that unrealistic and a matter of bias if you want to, but anyone with one eye and half a brain can see that there's a realistically good reason to be biased.