ADVERTISEMENT

OOTB's Political Thread . ..

I don't know why MAGAtards refuse to pick up on Trump's usual M.O. which is to say something or commit a crime and then deny it. You all have had literally hundreds of opportunities to do it through the years and still you just buy in to the denial and not what led up to the denial.
lol wait, whose M.O. is that? Once again we affirm that if a liberal says you are doing it, HE is the one actually doing it.

And let me guess about what led up to this 'denial'. Was it a massive and massively bogus investigation, two politically-motivated impeachments, and an unAmerican election setup, all taking place on a backdrop of constant, media-aided slander and mischaracterization of everything Trump attempted to achieve?

You know it was. Let's see who's denying now.
 
Thanks for confirming that Trump plainly stated to “remain peaceful”.
I'm confirming Trump's words came way too late and only AFTER the damage was done, which again is my point. There's a big difference in your wayward thoughts and my own, but I don't expect you to understand.

90

us-capitol-riots-january-2020.jpg

170px-Interior_damage_after_2021_storming_of_the_United_States_Capitol_by_Bill_Cassidy_01.jpg

21009777_G.jpeg

capitol-damage-kb-inline-210107-3.jpg

20160328-1983-Senate-bombing.jpg
 
I'm confirming Trump's words came way too late and only AFTER the damage was done, which again is my point. There's a big difference in your wayward thoughts and my own, but I don't expect you to understand.

90

us-capitol-riots-january-2020.jpg

170px-Interior_damage_after_2021_storming_of_the_United_States_Capitol_by_Bill_Cassidy_01.jpg

21009777_G.jpeg

capitol-damage-kb-inline-210107-3.jpg

20160328-1983-Senate-bombing.jpg
At least one of those pics is from past violent attacks on the Capitol (the last pic). Might wanna verify your propaganda site.

as I think @gunslingerdick or @bluetoe said - many multiple times the damage and loss of human life happened after DJT was elected and after the Floyd BLM summer of riots

Makes Jan 6 look mild ALMOST like a poorly staged coup concocted by incompetent FBI bureaucrats and anti- conservative insiders.

Nanzi, Epps, etc
 
At least one of those pics is from past violent attacks on the Capitol (the last pic). Might wanna verify your propaganda site.

as I think @gunslingerdick or @bluetoe said - many multiple times the damage and loss of human life happened after DJT was elected and after the Floyd BLM summer of riots

Makes Jan 6 look mild ALMOST like a poorly staged coup concocted by incompetent FBI bureaucrats and anti- conservative insiders.

Nanzi, Epps, etc
So one out of the six photos I inadvertently posted was from 1983 after a bomb exploded in the north wing of the Capitol by the May 19th Communist Organization, but first of all that in no way makes the other photos propaganda and second, I could easily substitute a different photo. There is a plethora of them available.

Compare January 6 to all the BLM riots you want, but only one of them happened at the US Capitol with the intention of stealing a fair election.
 
To the contrary, with little effort I goaded you into exposing your simplemindedness. Furthermore, you are trying to sound brainy by using redundant big words that essentially mean the same thing. By the way, this discussion is too one-sided against you to truly be debate.
You really are wacko if you believe that. Legend in your own mind while everyone else either mocks you or feels pity for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bluetoe and Archer2
" One tabulator had 163 paper ballots, but the poll closing tape only showed 79 ballots counted. The second tabulator contained 167 paper ballots, and the corresponding poll closing tape showed only 19 ballots had been counted.”

Multiply that by every Dominion machine in the country, and one can begin to just tap into the tip of the iceberg of election fraud.

 
" One tabulator had 163 paper ballots, but the poll closing tape only showed 79 ballots counted. The second tabulator contained 167 paper ballots, and the corresponding poll closing tape showed only 19 ballots had been counted.”

Multiply that by every Dominion machine in the country, and one can begin to just tap into the tip of the iceberg of election fraud.

No substack reference for bullet-proof validity?
 
Are YOU???

Integrity??? Where the hell do you think this is???
Yeah, I think any fair-minded and intelligent person who is not a delusional, Jim Jones style democrat (which is the vast majority these days), would agree my points are well-attested with facts and that yours are dishonest, devoid of logical and factual argument, and lacking basic integrity.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: uncboy10
Yeah, I think any fair-minded and intelligent person who is not a delusional, Jim Jones style democrat (which is the vast majority these days), would agree my points are well-attested with facts and that yours are dishonest, devoid of logical and factual argument, and lacking basic integrity.
Anyone who is not a "Jim Jones-style democrat" would agree?

You never answered me regarding whether or not you still have any of your survival food left over from Y2k... do you?
 
Anyone who is not a "Jim Jones-style democrat" would agree?

You never answered me regarding whether or not you still have any of your survival food left over from Y2k... do you?
That all you got? I don't even have survival food but don't disparage those that do and may well stock up for an emergency at some point.

You on the other hand suffer from TDS so bad that you cannot acknowledge factual successes of his administration such as:

Low Inflation.

Booming economy pre-Covid with the majority of gains going to the lower half of income earners, first time in decades, and historic rises in median income.

Moving towards becoming the most energy producer nation on earth.

Incredible international relations success such as historic peace deal between Gulf States and Israel, literally exceeding Jimmy Carter's peace deal whereby he received a Nobel prize, quickly destroying ISIS but wisely refusing to take advantage of our position to establish new military bases in the region, resisting the establishment and media's blood thirsty desire to start new wars such as bombing Iran while wisely taking out their terror leader, NATO members ponying up, the Taliban not killing an American soldier in 18 months, halting Russia's expansion plans and on and on.

Against a slurry of phony litigation, getting control of the southern border.

I could go on but people like you are so intellectually dishonest you cannot admit, yeah these things were good, and then just explain why you still hate the man. That would be honest. Instead you just make up stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bluetoe and Archer2
That all you got? I don't even have survival food but don't disparage those that do and may well stock up for an emergency at some point.

You on the other hand suffer from TDS so bad that you cannot acknowledge factual successes of his administration such as:

Low Inflation.

Booming economy pre-Covid with the majority of gains going to the lower half of income earners, first time in decades, and historic rises in median income.

Moving towards becoming the most energy producer nation on earth.
Incredible international relations success such as historic peace deal between Gulf States and Israel, literally exceeding Jimmy Carter's peace deal whereby he received a Nobel prize, quickly destroying ISIS but wisely refusing to take advantage of our position to establish new military bases in the region, resisting the establishment and media's blood thirsty desire to start new wars such as bombing Iran while wisely taking out their terror leader, NATO members ponying up, the Taliban not killing an American soldier in 18 months, halting Russia's expansion plans and on and on.

Against a slurry of phony litigation, getting control of the southern border.

I could go on but people like you are so intellectually dishonest you cannot admit, yeah these things were good, and then just explain why you still hate the man. That would be honest. Instead you just make up stuff.
pre-Covid... yep. A whole of things "pre-Covid" were different. Your dear leader botched everything after that. He failed the test of true leadership during adversity. Thems the breaks. So, the next best thing is to pretend it was a hoax, or downplay it, or deflect from it, claim the vaccines are deadly, whatever it takes to cover for the shit-for-brains. And, I have TDS??? His disciples, like you, are the ones that are deranged. You will defend the shit-heel no matter what. Talking about "Jim Jones"... sheezus, dude!

It's abundantly clear that you're just swimming... drowning... in your own confirmation bias and socio-political echo chambers. Your sources are all just blatantly-biased propaganda... but, of course it's me that is "intellectually dishonest."

You've got some nerve claiming that anyone else is in some kind of bubble.
 
pre-Covid... yep. A whole of things "pre-Covid" were different. Your dear leader botched everything after that. He failed the test of true leadership during adversity. Thems the breaks. So, the next best thing is to pretend it was a hoax, or downplay it, or deflect from it, claim the vaccines are deadly, whatever it takes to cover for the shit-for-brains. And, I have TDS??? His disciples, like you, are the ones that are deranged. You will defend the shit-heel no matter what. Talking about "Jim Jones"... sheezus, dude!

It's abundantly clear that you're just swimming... drowning... in your own confirmation bias and socio-political echo chambers. Your sources are all just blatantly-biased propaganda... but, of course it's me that is "intellectually dishonest."

You've got some nerve claiming that anyone else is in some kind of bubble.
The only way he blew it and he did was listening to die-hard wacko democrats like Fauci. Huge mistake.

To me, he failed but the reasons you believe he failed in the leadership areas are entirely bogus. He failed to get rid of the crooks that brought Covid here.

Never should have locked down or pushed the vax. The monoclonal antibodies were good as were his instincts on treatments like HCQ.

But there was nothing any president could do to stop the pandemic. Nor even limit it's spread once it was here. Best he could have done is fire all the democrats running our public health agencies, appointed a special prosecutor to look into Fauci and all those involved or better yet consider it a military style attack with a bioweapon involving people like Fauci and key leaders in public health agencies, Bill Gates and their allies in China.

But your idea he could have somehow done anything to prevent the spread is absolutely insane.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: tarheel0910
The only way he blew it and he did was listening to die-hard wacko democrats like Fauci. Huge mistake.

To me, he failed but the reasons you believe he failed in the leadership areas are entirely bogus. He failed to get rid of the crooks that brought Covid here.

Never should have locked down or pushed the vax. The monoclonal antibodies were good as were his instincts on treatments like HCQ.

But there was nothing any president could do to stop the pandemic. Nor even limit it's spread once it was here. Best he could have done is fire all the democrats running our public health agencies, appointed a special prosecutor to look into Fauci and all those involved or better yet consider it a military style attack with a bioweapon involving people like Fauci and key leaders in public health agencies, Bill Gates and their allies in China.

But your idea he could have somehow done anything to prevent the spread is absolutely insane.
Those darn crooks!
 
" In the sentencing hearing for long-time con man Stephen Alford, who was charged in the Gaetz extortion case and sentenced to five years in prison, federal Judge Margaret Casey Rodgers questioned why former military intelligence officer and State Department contractor Bob Kent — who was involved in virtually every step of the crime — was not charged as well, saying she disagrees that there isn’t the evidence for it (emphasis added):"

Because the Deep Staters were behind the crime and extortion. They are a criminal gang."

 
I'm confirming Trump's words came way too late and only AFTER the damage was done, which again is my point. There's a big difference in your wayward thoughts and my own, but I don't expect you to understand.
what you said was that 'Trump was on the sidelines cheering the rioters' or words to that effect.

Wait, here it is...
The biggest difference is the American President wasn't on the sidelines cheerleading those riots like he was on January 6.

There's a big difference between that and what you're trying to sell now. As is par for the course, of course. The words Trump tweeted during the riot are not the words of someone 'cheerleading those riots', regardless of when exactly they were spoken (which was not after the damage was done, BTW). In attempting to further the narrative, you have only gained more Pinocchio points.


giphy.gif



you can argue...and of course you will...that Trumps words prior to the riot were his 'cheerleading' words, but even if you buy those words to be inciteful of rioting, no riot existed then to be cheered on and no riot could be predicted based on those words. All we are left with is wondering how you get in and out of vehicles with such a proboscis. As we always wonder.
 
Yeah, I think any fair-minded and intelligent person who is not a delusional, Jim Jones style democrat (which is the vast majority these days), would agree my points are well-attested with facts and that yours are dishonest, devoid of logical and factual argument, and lacking basic integrity.
I agree that any reasonable person must see that you always assemble an actual argument, usually inclusive of corroborating linkage, whereas @strummingram tends to retreat into nanny nanny boo boo mode at any serious challenge to his mostly unfounded commentary. Examples of this abound just in the last several pages of posts.
 
what you said was that 'Trump was on the sidelines cheering the rioters' or words to that effect.

Wait, here it is...


There's a big difference between that and what you're trying to sell now. As is par for the course, of course. The words Trump tweeted during the riot are not the words of someone 'cheerleading those riots', regardless of when exactly they were spoken (which was not after the damage was done, BTW). In attempting to further the narrative, you have only gained more Pinocchio points.


giphy.gif



you can argue...and of course you will...that Trumps words prior to the riot were his 'cheerleading' words, but even if you buy those words to be inciteful of rioting, no riot existed then to be cheered on and no riot could be predicted based on those words. All we are left with is wondering how you get in and out of vehicles with such a proboscis. As we always wonder.
First I'll need the Rosetta Stone to help translate all that gibberish.
 
Yes, the lunatics do believe men can have babies.


Your daily reminder that transgenderism is a mental disorder. These people need treatment and the last thing they need is celebration of bringing a child into a f*cked up situation. And I like how this clearly demented person has chosen to be a “solo parent”. I’m not sure if she did that to eliminate a potentially more normal person being able to save the kid or she wanted to make sure she ruined the child’s life. That’s what liberals are now turning to - “If you won’t let me abort my child, I’m just going to give the child no chance at a successful life!”
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT