OOTB's Political Thread . ..
- Thread starter BillyL
- Start date
The Horror! We must protect the children from calling boobs "funbags"! Gas gets more expensive every time a child says "schlong"! Booo HoooooI would like someone to attempt to justify books like these being in schools. We have become a perverse society to the delight of sick, groomer, liberals.
Pentagon's schools infested with shocking pornographic material for military kids: 'Time to send a d*ck pic'
Fox News Digital finds that Department of Defense Activity school libraries are filled with sexually explicit and pornographic "banned" books.www.foxnews.com
thoughts and prayers - that'll do the trick!
Why can't regular citizens have heavy artillery, tanks, and nuclear weapons/missiles? You claim that they are all in the Constitution.
No, I don't claim classified intel should be public. I do claim the 2nd amendment right to bear arms specifically entails military weapons.
To pretend otherwise is a lie despite the pragmatic and practical concerns of what it would entail if certain weapons and weapons systems were privately owned. But perhaps we need some sort of larger discussion than just trying to seize guns.
The Swiss all have assault rifles by law, and it works out well for them.
I didn't say "classified intel", did I? I said, very specifically, heavy artillery, tanks and nuclear weapons (missiles, etc.). You're convinced that the people who wrote the Constitution were aware of the capabilities of weaponry in the centuries that would follow. They didn't have any clue that one day human beings could literally destroy their ability to inhabit the planet.
My only point is you are making assumptions and interpreting that information based upon the hindsight of the events of 9 days later.
The family didn't have a third-party remove the gun. It says the mother didn't want it there. The police were absolutely certain he was legally entitled to have it or they would have taken it and charged him accordingly. So, they did the next best thing which was get everyone to agree that a third-party could take it to resolve whatever was going on at that time. Had he chosen to do so, the young man could likely have refused to let his property be voluntarily removed. This is no different from when the police ask someone to go somewhere else to spend the night and let things calm down. You are likely correct in light of 9 days later, but we just don't know. I'm not arguing, honest.
So I'm the one with no brain power, but you're the one putting your butthurt on full display with no clue that you're doing so. LOL. If you weren't such a dipshit, I'd almost feel sorry for you and try to help you see what a fool you make of yourself.
But you know that the real reason that I can't take your word for anything is that you're a compulsive liar.
The Horror! We must protect the children from calling boobs "funbags"! Gas gets more expensive every time a child says "schlong"! Booo Hooooo
Not surprising you didn't speak to this part of the article:
"Another passage appeared to describe an 8-year-old having sex while he was away from home."
Yeah, that's totally normal. No grooming at all involved, ...you sick f*ck.
I have no idea what you're saying.
Oh, wait...this is you again trying to be funny. We've talked about this and how you should refrain. Some people just can't do it. I'm sure you're good at something though.
"A book for Teens"The Horror! We must protect the children from calling boobs "funbags"! Gas gets more expensive every time a child says "schlong"! Booo Hooooo
Teens? Teenagers?
I'm not surprised by a repressed society and its need for euphemisms for genitalia and anything that should be "whispered" when spoken.
Or how about we let parents use what ever language they want to use when they have those conversations with their children in the privacy of their homes. If we don't force those conversations in public, then we won't have to whisper.
It's easy for @strummingram to chime in since he has no children. He's the Oprah of this board.
Are they denying parents their choice of language in private, now? Your kids go to private everything. What do you care? If it's not directly bothering you, personally, and specifically, then it's not really happening.
Public conversations can be just as easily avoided as they are engaged in... by choosing not to participate.
I just saw the title was "Sex: A Book for Teens." I was asking... someone else... a question. And, apparently, that attracts the stalkers.
I'm not talking about assault rifles. I said... heavy artillery, tanks and nuclear weapons. You avoid that with "classified intel"and then mentioning what Switzerland is doing. Switzerland is not the USA and they don't operate under the US Constitution.
So the Dutch put people in prison for getting the booster and the Swiss will put you in prison if you don’t own an assault rifle. Damn it’s fuking hell to be European.
My kids do indeed go to private school. They'll be miles ahead of their public school cohorts because of this garbage curriculum that has infested public ed. Public school student scores are plummeting. Private school scores are not, my kids' school which stayed open all of COVID, had no severe illnesses and scores rose. So from a standpoint of how this directly impacts my kids, frankly, all this benefits them individually.
But our society rot continues. There's a reason people whisper when talking about such things. It's because those discussions aren't meant for the public square, you dolt. The reason they are not is because families have different preferences of what is and what isn't acceptable. So it behooves us all to allow those conversations to take part in private FOR EVERYONE.
And don't be stupid. Kids cannot avoid public discussions of such at school.
Yeah, you never chime in and give an unsolicited opinion. Oh wait...
In fact, I can't remember when anyone here has ever asked for your thoughts on...well, ...anything. If I need guitar playing lessons, I'll let you know. Until then, I don't expect to see any comments from you.
You don't go to the public square. And, if you do, you make sure that your public square is just a bunch of clones of yourself. If families are that repressed and sensitive, they shuld stay indoors and blocked-off from what might offend them.
By the way, whispering is just evidence of the presence of shame, guilt, and whatever negative connotations Americans typically hang on "sensitive matters." That's actually the impetus for the degradation. You make something taboo, or even just seem taboo, and kids... hell, adults who know better... will immediately want to do it, or exploit it, all the more.
This country's culture has some insane hangups regarding human sexuality. Blurring-out nipples on woman's breast is a prime example. They will show a man's nipple, or a woman with a mastectomy, but an actual breast is forbidden and improper. And, that's just for openers.
Nothing you said there surprises me. Straight from the grooming handbook.
You deranged, perverted sicko.
If only we could adhere to this rule broadly across society! Unfortunately, many people feel as though they have the right to not be offended. And worse, society is now bending over backwards, or trying to, in order to not offend them.
And forcing certain groups to be offended in an effort to not offend their prized minority voting bloc.
If Trump only puts himself first AND my 401k continued to grow, Im glad he was putting himself first.
THIS is what I'm talking about. If you have even half a brain you have to understand that this was the reason that so many improbable votes were cast in that last goatfvck of an election, set up and executed by the dems on a ruse of avoiding contagion. The dems who spend all their time talking about threats to our democracy while the only threat to our democracy is being perpetrated by them.Dems cheat every single election. So Fetterman has a chance. This is one of many ways they do it:
"But in our community it's kind of like an accepted practice that the man is coming by to pick up my absentee ballot or the lady is coming to pick up my absentee ballot."
In her sworn affidavit, Harris identifies specific individuals who direct and act as ballot brokers and were paid to collect ballots and provides intricate details on how the system allegedly works, along with emails, receipts, video footage and other evidence.
"Ballot brokers typically work up to a year in advance," she stated. "Ballot brokers visit individuals in their residences and assists the individual with filling out a request for a mail-in ballot. After the mail-in ballot arrives, the voter is instructed to wait for the ballot broker returns to the individuals residence. They are asked to not seal the certificate envelope."
"In rare circumstances, if the voter has filled out the ballot and sealed the envelope certificate, the ballot broker will take the ballot and then steam open the sealed envelope," the affidavit added. "The ballot broker will either correct any votes, if necessary, that were not voted according to their wishes or just throw them out."
Harris described how, much as in Wisconsin, vulnerable patients in rehabilitation centers and nursing homes in Florida were targeted for ballot trafficking.
"For nursing homes ... ballot brokers get the list of residents by cross referencing the address with the voter registration list," she explained. "The ballot broker figures out the best way to make contact, usually thru friends and family that may or may not know they are even part of a scheme. They help the resident fill out the mail-in-ballot or just take the mail-in-ballot from the nursing home and deliver it to the ballot broker."
Democrat blows whistle on alleged ballot harvesting scheme, Florida opens criminal probe
Former candidate for Orange County commissioner describes widespread vote trafficking operation in Orlando area, authorities see enough evidence to warrant criminal probe.justthenews.com
Being offended is kind of a choice. As long as there's no real discrimination involved, or stripping peoples' basic rights from them, being offended is almost something to be thankful for, in a way.
Name one time you’ve criticized the right on anything.
You criticize polarization and yet you play right into it at the same time.
where have I criticized polarization? I have observed it and advised that it's a necessary outcome of a two-party system. I have never claimed that polarization is some bugaboo to be avoided, but rather have scoffed at those who clamor for compromise all the time. Why would you compromise with wrongheadedness? Maybe my bashing the two-party system as the cause of polarization has confused you.
The only thing I've criticized about polarization is the left for being so greatly the party of liberal idiocy that I have to overlook those things I find fault with the right for. Aside from the things that I favor the right for, the left practically shoves me the rest of the way in that direction. That's the basis for my going right and there's no 'playing into polarization' as if it's some sort of trap I can't resist. That's just idiotic, and it seems like it could be the product of the self-indoctrination or media-driven brainwashing you exhibit here.
If you aren't aware of what I've criticized the right for, you should inform yourself before opening your piehole and showing your ignorance. All you have to do is ask.
I am on record here in this forum explaining that I am nowhere near in step with the right on environmental issues including global warming, and science matters in general. The environment and science are almost everything to me, and if the dems gave those things more than just a nod and a wink while fostering so many fvcked up social engineering endeavors, I might be more willing to tolerate those leftist bleeding heart pinko commies.
So what about #42, 504. Looks like you have the time now.
you hit the nail on the head. We are so societally screwed in the head at this point that we demand that others limit their precious free speech to keep us from being adults. Liberals are children. We have become a society of children being led by children.
There is no right to not be offended and the notion is ludicrous to the mentally mature adult....yet it is a thing. There is alternatively the freedom and ability to let the words of others reflect on them and not us. Why don't liberals promote this? Because they are children to be held and coddled, and meanies who dare to speak their minds are to be punished.
Last edited:
Polarization that would threaten to tear the country apart is something you don't have an issue with as it suits your aims? The ends justify the means. That's good to know.
Clearly you cannot resist it and I have no trouble in saying that you are just as inept at resisting buying into complete bullshit as anyone else in this country. The mere fact you give credence to someone like randman is disturbing as it is.
Then I will ask now. What bothers you about the far right? Aside from their stance on environmental issues.
The value of the average 401k nearly doubled from January 2009 - January 2013, the period of Obama’s first term.
So I’m guessing you voted for Obama in 2012 and were singing his praises on message boards? Or no? Does your idiotic reasoning only apply to certain politicians?
More than a week B4 the election and the GOP is already painting fraud, setting the stage for another big lie.
I wasnt investing heavily in the stock market back then. It all looked like shit.
I started heavily investing in the market in 2014. So your comment, as usual, is baseless. Learn to stay in your lane, child.
Sure.
Either way, you seem to judge Presidents based on 401k performance so obviously you view Obama’s first term as one of the greatest in US History, right? Or no? Does your idiotic reasoning only apply to certain politicians?
