what? Operate with impunity because they are allowed to stand on an equal footing? Being protected from the majority's will is 'getting their president'? If they are extremely lucky, they'll get their president, our systems weaknesses notwithstanding..Why should rural areas in red states (especially southern ones) be allowed to operate with impunity when it comes to education, abortion, LGBT rights, Voting Rights, etc.?
Better yet, ask yourself why a minority of rural voters should be allowed to get their President over the will of the non rural majority? That's profoundly anti-democratic. It doesn't make any sense and has absolutely nothing to do with 'states rights'.
Your mind is too far gone to reason with, but let me make this last-ditch attempt to reach you.
ANTI-DEMOCRATIC IS THE POINT, YOU FVCKING NITWIT, and there's nothing 'profound' about it.. Do you know what the word democracy even means? Did you not pick up at all on me saying THANK GOD we are a republic form of democracy and not a pure democracy as you suggested?
I posted not that long ago about the simple reality that the name of the party you adhere to reveals your POV. Democrats are democratic. DUH. They tend to want the majority to make the rules for everyone because the word democrat speaks of majority. Republicans are for a republic, where the individual is democratically represented but there are protections in place for the individual AGAINST the majority in a pure democracy. Our politics is a constant see-saw battle between the two sides. The FF understood that a pure democracy was bad juju, and fashioned our system roughly after the Romans. Idiots have been trying to reinvent that wheel ever since, to the point that we are now running on square wheels. And you want to make them even more square?
"It doesn't make any sense and has absolutely nothing to do with 'states rights'."
None are so blind as they who will not see. It has everything to do with States having powers. AS I EXPLAINED, it's another layer of protection for the minority from the majority.
You want to know why the majority shouldn't rule? I can't believe I'm even having to explain this. The majority shouldn't rule because the majority would have the minority paying all the taxes and providing all the benefits. OH WAIT, that's the way it already is. We should make it even more so I guess. Yeah, that's the ticket. Jeebus crissmas, where do our education dollars go?.