Of course you don't. Imaginary friends and family members can't lick stamps, much less slip cards into envelopes and mail them. You should check it out sometime. They always have a lot of stupid shit in them like "those magical moments of solitude" and "restorative feelings," crap like that. You can tell they must be created by some of the loneliest people on earth.
good suggestion, but my situation now is such that I can choose solitude or company at will, and that's a good place to be. That being said, I have spent untold hours enjoying the peace and quiet of the woods, and that's also a great place to be. I hunted some in my younger days, but at this time I get as much charge out of just seeing a deer or other wildlife as I might have shooting one.
I'm not sure why I need to check out Hallmark cards that come from your imaginary friends when you routinely provide all the 'stupid shit' one might care to read. Maybe I'm missing something.
I understand your point, but there is a reason they call it deer hunting and not deer shooting (much like going fishing versus going catching). There's very little to compare to what one experiences in the woods when the forest wakes up at sunrise or goes to sleep at sunset. As to your last note, for a variety of reasons, many of my friends and family are still out in the woods, but they leave their firearms at home and now take their cameras.
Why would you need a dishwasher at the game in San Diego? You don't have to lie to make people like you. A trip to San Diego isn't a really big deal anyway.Oh, well, it looks like I need to line up a dishwasher after all. Enjoy the game with your "friends and family."
I'm with them.
That's a phrase I heard a ton from momma as a kid. And since my dad was a bit of a knife collector, it had legs in my mind. You brought back a good memory of her. Thanks.
to me, getting skinned alive meant something beyond getting switched on my bare legs with a limb from one of the willow trees in our yard. The switchings were frequent, but I somehow managed to avoid a skinning. Some close calls though.
Monarchies suck. Period.
What the hell are you mumbling about, you stupid spit-brain? I never said I was going to San Diego. I watched the game at home like most everyone else.
time.com
Up until the last 20 seconds it was a great game. I have no doubt that you were hoping for an Oregon blowout just so you could be right and I would be wrong. Hence, you're the definition of a true bandwagon fan.
And anyone who considers a program that went 9-4 in the regular season, won the Coastal Division and a berth in the ACC title game, and had the 25th best overall record (out of 131 FBS programs) in the nation mediocre is an absolute idiot.
Mack said post game that he didn't have the leg to make that and apparently the reason he missed the one earlier was because he slipped on the horrible field. Not sure if a FG would have been a good idea when taking that into account. Don't know what I would have done in the moment. You're right about the TO though. That would have given us at least one more play and a manageable FG.
Sure, but I don't think it's a stretch to believe a college kicker doesn't have the leg for a 57 yard field goal. I don't think anyone would disagree that the field was shit either.
I said that in the game thread. How do two people on the same team have the same number. Ridiculous.
You want metrics?
The only way would be to either substantially reduce the rosters and scholarships or go to three-digit numbers on jerseys. Take a look at Carolina's roster and note all the duplicate numbers (divided by the offense and defense).
There is no excuse for that penalty.
I know in the pros, certain positions are limited to certain numbers. Not sure if that's the same for college.
When I was a kid, it used to be that you could tell what position a player was by their number. Kickers and punters were like #1-#5, QBs were #6-#19, RBs were #20-#3, FBs were in the 40s, LBs were the 50s, OL were numbered in the 60s, DL had the 70s, receivers were in the 80s. The DBs had random #s, sometimes. It was an easy system. I don't recall ever seeing 2 players w/the same #s
you could argue even more reasonably more or less the same about our wins...and I have.
it isn't how common it is, it's knowing the rules regarding it.
I would guess that was partly on Pettaway but to a much greater extent on Larry Porter, the special teams coach. They had to see it coming, knowing Power Echols is a fixture on the punt return team and that Pettaway was filling in this game for Josh Downs. They both wear #23.
I mean on the sidelines, suited-up to play. There are enough numbers that no one needs a duplicate #.
Yes, I would say every player on the roster I linked was on the sideline last night and ready at a moment's notice to go into the game with the exception of those on the injury list like Caleb Hood and Noah Taylor, players lost to the transfer portal like Tony Grimes and Storm Duck, and of course Josh Downs who opted out to prepare for the NFL.
