would that rock be a little mineral or a lot mineral?
Your choice of course, but I have no problem favoring one over the other. By a huge margin.
OOTB's Political Thread . ..
- Thread starter BillyL
- Start date
Your choice of course, but I have no problem favoring one over the other. By a huge margin.
I have no need to recheck anything. You either need to study evolution or learn to read. If you're stumbling the way I think you probably are, I said several billion years of evolution, not several billion years of human evolution. We are at the end of a branch of the tree of life. We are connected all the way back to the beginning of the tree. We developed, as I said elsewhere, as the culmination of the evolution of all the life that we evolved from. And as I said, that evolution was shaped by competition and survival.
Or did you mean something else?
a few exceptions to the rule, and those because they parotted the narrative.
I picked up on that too, but quickly understood that when J6 was termed 'deadly', they weren't referring to the protester who voluntarily put herself in jeopardy, they were referring to the death of an innocent Cap police guy....which as she indicates was not killed in the line of duty as put forth by the lefties..
he is an opinionator, and opinions is what he puts out. Those opinions are based on actual news events and the reality of the world around us. How is that any different than those on the liberal side who do exactly the same thing? And I think you're forgetting that the criticism here has been simply that he aired actual footage. So as NW asks, how can you criticize someone for bringing us the verifiable footage? How can you criticize actual journalism in this case?
I addressed this before, the disingenuous use of verbiage derived from a plea deal to indicate anything resembling reality. A plea deal is arranged just for the purpose of extracting that verbiage and admittance of its veracity, in exchange for lighter punishment than might be meted out in a trial. And the trials in this case are highly likely to result in conviction just because of the distorted perceptions that Carlson and most of us on the right protest.
You know as well as I do that there are many innocent people who have served time because they chose the less damaging option, which was to admit to something they didn't do. I'm not saying that that's the case here, I'm saying you can't reasonably contend that the verbiage derived from a plea deal is at all a reliable indication of what took place.
admit what, idiot? I explained what didn't need explaining to you like the simpleton that you are. Why don't you explain what you think is incorrect about my original post or my explanation. Why don't you EVER you do something other than make inane comments and then disappear without ever backing up anything you say. Why don't you say what it is you think I'm not admitting.
You are the most chickenshit poster I've ever run across. Seriously, you really are a coward.
Last edited:
Actually, what you wrote was, "we are all humans and behave accorcing [sic] to the traits developed over several billion years of evolution."
If you weren't talking about human traits, what were you suggesting? If you therefore weren't talking about human evolution, what type of evolution were you talking about from billions of years ago? The evolution of microbes? Yeah, I'm sure the competition for survival between tiny microscopic organisms was fierce and that is why we are what we are today.
Face it, Boy Blunder, @prlyles just owned you and all you can do now is what you always do when you get owned here -- refuse to admit your mistake and wiggle like the primitive worm that you are.
@prlyles hasn't ever owned his own teeth much less any poster here.
This is something I would have expected from a couple of other posters, not yourself. The TDS/J6 mindset is strong with you for certain, but this????? Of course the legacy media loves them, they are as anti orange "as it gets."
You keep going back to this. All this demonstrates is that you either have no concept whatsoever of the plea process, particularly in the federal system, or you are so deep in wanting the narrative to be true that you can't accept the notion that people will do virtually anything to save their ass. The shaman was facing years and years and years if things went full bore and he lost. Or, he could say what they wanted and get a recommended 41 months (I think that's the number). He took his medicine and limited the damage. We've seen this before with a certain general who plead guilty when he was looking to protect his son from the feds. It doesn't mean that they are totally innocent of every single thing, but it also doesn't mean that they were full tilt guilty of things the way it has been portrayed either. I simply don't understand why you can't let the video speak for itself.
So, I saw the headlines that a Russian fighter jet had collided with a U.S. unmanned drone over the Black Sea and the drone had sufficient damage that it had to ditch.
Anyone know what was behind Trump's thinking in telling Putin to have the fighter do this?
Anyone know what was behind Trump's thinking in telling Putin to have the fighter do this?
No telling with Trump. I heard he caused a bank to collapse recently too. Plus he told putin to screw around with the UK and Germany so they'd scramble fighter jets.
I heard awhile back that he had been training with Russian Spetsnaz so he could personally take out oil pipelines.
what I said was completely accurate and it was exactly what I meant to say. We have only been human for a blink of the geological eye. Whether you are referring to our presnt form or the ancestral forms that are classified as human, I will only surmise a million years for the sake of argument and of course much less for Homo Sapiens. But just as I explained, our evolution did not begin with the first identifiable human primate.Actually, what you wrote was, "we are all humans and behave accorcing [sic] to the traits developed over several billion years of evolution."
If you weren't talking about human traits, what were you suggesting? If you therefore weren't talking about human evolution, what type of evolution were you talking about from billions of years ago? The evolution of microbes? Yeah, I'm sure the competition for survival between tiny microscopic organisms was fierce and that is why we are what we are today.
Face it, Boy Blunder, @prlyles just owned you and all you can do now is what you always do when you get owned here -- refuse to admit your mistake and wiggle like the primitive worm that you are.
Our evolution is connected all the way back to the beginning of life. Traits that developed in the chain of animals that we eventually branched away from were inherited by us. Not all the traits, I never said that; but more specifically I referred to those that pertain to survival and competition...just as I said.
"lesson I received at my time at UNC is that we are all humans and behave accorcing to the traits developed over several billion years of evolution, wherein survival and competition were the overriding factors."
oops, did you forget to include that last part, you lying ******? LOL.
Many of those traits that we have are plainly seen in not just other mammals but in other branches of animal life that branched away from common ancestors. And you ignorantly scoff at bacteria competing? If you understand anything about evolution, you know that those bacteria did not surbvive without having to compete and developing survival qualities. THEY HAD TO, or they would have died out just as untold thousands of species of animal life did. All organisms since the beginning of life have had to compete to survive, and along the way survival traits (not all of them) developed that were passed on.
That you don't understand this basically simple part of evolution theory yet you open your piehole about it, is just another example of you trying too hard to not be the wasted fvck that you are. In doing so you have earned the latest infantile nickname you stupidly apply to me. And better yet, you have paired yourself intellectually with @prlyles. LMAO at that distinct honor.
I will say this. At least you have the balls to stick your neck out and out yourself as an idiot (and liar). The chickenshit lyles just hits and hides without a hint of substantiation of anything.
"Yeah, I'm sure the competition for survival between tiny microscopic organisms was fierce and that is why we are what we are today.
"that is exactly in many ways why we are what we are today. Ignoramus.
Here is a video I posted some time back regarding the very subject at hand. Educate yourself and maybe you won't look quite the fool you have so far here.
And DJT rigged the tracks to derail a train and cause a real climate / environment catastrophe in East Palestine OH. Let's sure we get all his evil deeds out there (everything bad is Orange Man's fault)
I'm not worried about this one though because Sec Buttplug is on top of everything transportation!
Charlotte my ass. I'd bet the farm this was written by Kamala Harris.
Nah, it didn't include a Venn diagram.
Wait, you've suddenly gone from "several billion years" to "a million years for the sake of argument," as if that will save your stupid and pointless conclusion. Talk about backpedaling.what I said was completely accurate and it was exactly what I meant to say. We have only been human for a blink of the geological eye. Whether you are referring to our presnt form or the ancestral forms that are classified as human, I will only surmise a million years for the sake of argument and of course much less for Homo Sapiens. But just as I explained, our evolution did not begin with the first identifiable human primate.
Our evolution is connected all the way back to the beginning of life. Traits that developed in the chain of animals that we eventually branched away from were inherited by us. Not all the traits, I never said that; but more specifically I referred to those that pertain to survival and competition...just as I said.
"lesson I received at my time at UNC is that we are all humans and behave accorcing to the traits developed over several billion years of evolution, wherein survival and competition were the overriding factors."
oops, did you forget to include that last part, you lying ******? LOL.
Many of those traits that we have are plainly seen in not just other mammals but in other branches of animal life that branched away from common ancestors. And you ignorantly scoff at bacteria competing? If you understand anything about evolution, you know that those bacteria did not surbvive without having to compete and developing survival qualities. THEY HAD TO, or they would have died out just as untold thousands of species of animal life did. All organisms since the beginning of life have had to compete to survive, and along the way survival traits (not all of them) developed that were passed on.
That you don't understand this basically simple part of evolution theory yet you open your piehole about it, is just another example of you trying too hard to not be the wasted fvck that you are. In doing so you have earned the latest infantile nickname you stupidly apply to me. And better yet, you have paired yourself intellectually with @prlyles. LMAO at that distinct honor.
I will say this. At least you have the balls to stick your neck out and out yourself as an idiot (and liar). The chickenshit lyles just hits and hides without a hint of substantiation of anything.
"Yeah, I'm sure the competition for survival between tiny microscopic organisms was fierce and that is why we are what we are today.
that is exactly in many ways why we are what we are today. Ignoramus.
Here is a video I posted some time back regarding the very subject at hand. Educate yourself and maybe you won't look quite the fool you have so far here.
And thanks for the evolution lecture, Professor Darwin. I'm surprised a Trump-loving, backwoods idiot like you doesn't believe solely in Creationism. Nevertheless, take your flow chart and use it yourself whenever you need a refresher course. Obviously you are once again playing the role of pretentious blowhard, monkey man.
Last edited:
but I haven't suddenly gone from billions to a milliion because that's what I said all along...and you are just doing your lying best to make it seem otherwise because you made a fool of yourself, as per usual with you. Several billion years of evolution, and only because the readily apparent had to be pointed out to you two numbskulls, a million years of human evolution which isn't even germane to the point.
You're welcome for the help with evolution. You need it.
"Obviously you are once again playing the role of pretentious blowhard, monkey man."
LOL, monkey man? You are glaring proof of what I've been positing; and I should apologize to the other primates for saying so.
Get that GED.
You are such a little loser. I’m glad you found a home here. You should feel at home.
Being "conservative", fiscally, socially, etc has nothing to do with anyone's opinion of trump or maga. If you don't see Cheney as conservative then you've forgotten the original definition.
and just as I keep pointing out about you, you make yet another mindless, inane assertion without one word of explanation or substantiation. That's because you know you have shit for any argument to back you up and shit for brains to make one. You know if you try to argue you lose immediately so you just throw your little spitballs and then run and hide.
But I'm the loser? LOL. You're just a spineless coward.
We can debate Cheney's positions all you want, but she is a warmonger and global interventionist. In many ways, she is her father. You are the one that cited Liz as an example of how the media wasn't anti repub because they love "Cheney who is as conservative as it gets." That is, you associated media loving an ultimate conservative, but the two topics are not connected and are not responsible for the love you point out.
Literally, if you took most of her positions without a letter associated with them, a blank name, and did a survey, the media would hate her. For example, she ran for office and came out against gay marriage - something that her own sister had done. The media loves that???? The point is she is loved by the media for one reason and one reason only, she hates trump and the fact that he got us out of her father's wars. She's as anti orange as anyone on this board. That's why the media loves her and why Nancy appointed her to J6. Don't try to blow smoke that the media loves a conservative.
How is it you cannot grasp the difference between condemning exploitation and grooming of children and advocating it?hey @randman1 I’ve somehow missed your moral outrage post over protecting the kids from deviants like this. What gives? This guy get a pass for some reason?
Merrick jailed on over 880 felony counts of child pornography
SMETHPORT — A Christian musician, pastor and former Bradford store owner is in McKean County Jail, charged with more than 880 felony counts of child pornography.www.bradfordera.com
Are there any Christians supporting what this man did?
This should make everyone feel okay.
Feels 2008-ish to me. The funniest part is when I found out that the same asshole- Joseph Gentile (I love that name and hilarious irony)- tanked Lehman Brothers in 2008, as CFO, also happened to be the CAO of SVB, which collapsed.
Rewarding bank criminals has no downside.
Feels 2008-ish to me. The funniest part is when I found out that the same asshole- Joseph Gentile (I love that name and hilarious irony)- tanked Lehman Brothers in 2008, as CFO, also happened to be the CAO of SVB, which collapsed.
Rewarding bank criminals has no downside.
Funny you mention beauty piece of work Barney. I think he is / was on board of other recent collapsing bank Signature Bank. And he helped write the rules / regs that were supposed to stop this sort of recurrence from 2008 (Dodd - Frank).
Newsome - gov of CA with several companies highly entrenched in SVB - lobbied hard for SVB bailout. He forgot not mention his conflict of interest. I’m sure it’s just an innocent oversight.
The nepotism and corruption in govt and business is sickening but entirely predictable
Last edited:
What do those 2 have in common, I wonder?
Dems run most agencies. Totally inherently corrupt. Not saying there aren't a bunch of Uniparty Reps as well but the administrative state acts independently and often in flagrant violations of elected officials and the law, and they are overwhelmingly democrats.
Bunch of judges are corrupt as well, from both parties.
Yes, please make this a partisan thing.
Republicans and Democrats are equally filthy in assisting to ruin the American economy and banking/financial situation. They're all bought-and-sold.
This is an Oligarchy.
try to control your overreactive little hissy fits. Barney Frank made a similar, noteworthy appearance supporting and defending those things that resulted in the sub-prime fiasco, and no one else did. If it had been Santa Claus who did that, I would have said shades of Santa Claus.Yes, please make this a partisan thing.
Republicans and Democrats are equally filthy in assisting to ruin the American economy and banking/financial situation. They're all bought-and-sold.
This is an Oligarchy.
Last edited:
Ahh hell I see a look a like thread loomingSpeaking of puppets, are these two pigs from the same litter?
Plenty of things to dislike about E Warren but she seems to be one of the few people with a grasp on the financial game and one of the providing ideas to protect Americans against that gm.
Does she? If you say so. I think she's a lot of talk and no walk. That's what you get from politicians. When they're not benefiting from insider trading, they're busy pretending that "it's THEIR fault!"
From where I'm sitting, both of these so-called "sides" empower, encourage, and cover for these banking criminals every chance they get. Obama's administration did NOTHING to ANY of them! There's no accountability.
These assholes come right back and lobby/buy-off the members of the government to allow them to privatize their gambling with other peoples' money and profiting from it and then socialize their costly mistakes after it breaks the whole fvcking system, and get bailed-out on the back end. MEanwhile, the middle class takes it in the nuts.
My protest will include turning back a few celebratory beers and raising a glass to toast the prosecutors. How about you?
Similar threads
