If your point is that MSM is
Lol that was great. What a clown show of a network MSNBC is - outdoing themselves weekly, it seems.
I don't know why I even try with him. She specifically sets out how they covered 25 mass shootings and the only time they mention the race of the shooter is in 2 of the 5 instances of the white shooter - they completely ignore the issue of the shooter's race being black in 17 of those instances. 17 of 25 and the NYT ignores it. Now, I don't know or really care what the actual breakdown is with regard to the race of shooters because I don't know that it helps solve the problem in any respect. I just get so tired of the false outrage and narrative instead of addressing the real situation.
Here's another funny one for you. All you've got to do is let the page load and read the two lines that come up, no scrolling needed.
tinyurl.com
I am blocked and I am not going to subscribe of course, but I will assume that the perps blackness was disclosed.
yeah, I think you're bolstering her contention to a certain extent but aside from that, wouldn't hate crimes be a targeting of whites since hate crimes are seemingly a one-way street?
I've never posted this before but I swear if I didn't know better...and I don't know better...that starting with the Clintons, there has been a sellout to the Chinese by a dem leadership cabal wherein we are weakened for the furtherance of Chinese hegemony.
11 ways Biden and his handlers are hell-bent on destroying America
If an enemy wanted to destroy America, could he or she do anything much more catastrophic than what is already currently happening in our country?www.foxnews.com
Victor David Hanson is right on point with this opinion piece.
What did you think the definition of the word interpretation meant? Maybe you should have pulled out your dictionary before you stuck your foot in your mouth.
Sure you do. It's the same answer that most of the posts here boil down to: orangeman very, very bad.
maybe you shouldn't try to salvage your bruised ego by making ill-founded and disingenuous suggestions. As I pointed out, you are wrong. I just don't want to engage in you chasing your tail anymore trying not to admit it..
I'm not "salvaging" anything and my ego isn't bruised, but I do accept your surrender even though you should have done it about 48 hours ago.
Well he is very very bad. Horrible even. Yet he still manages to have a lead in the polls. (Albeit tiny) Why? Well it takes having an opponent thats an octagenarian who walks like he’s got a red hot poker up his ass, mumbles incoherently, and has a vp who would likely be pres if he’s elected who’s so far to the left that mods and independents and a lot of dems even cringe over. What’s worse? Well imagine going up against a flaming retard that lies as regularly as most people breathe, has been indicted like 50 times, and has proven time after time after time he puts himself ahead of the country. Imagine not being able to comfortably defeat such a pos. Such is the state of the us presidential election thanks to the mindless sheep who can only think in terms of repub vs dem. A fuking embarrassment. Total disgrace. If world politics were a sport the us version would be professional wrestling. And not the kind you see on TBS, the kind that tours places like lumberton and campobello with midgets on the undercard.
and I'm not surrendering, I'm just refusing to engage you in your predictable and tiresome tactic of hiding your defeat behind semantics. I don't care who 'won'; I made my point.
that only explains maybe 2/3 of the silence. All I can say is that it's very fortunate for Biden that I'm not likely to find myself in charge.
it amazes that you are representative of so many in this country who are actively observing Biden flushing the country down the drain in a big way, and have it all boil down in your mind to a POS against an old guy with a hot poker up his ass. Orange man bad vs. Old man bad, it's as simple as that.
Semantics, my eye. It was clear from the start the point I was making. You're the one with the tactic, specifically of trying to present things in their most literal sense when you can't figure out any other way to save face.
LMAO. There I go being literal again. I just don't play fair I guess.
you're almost there. Grow some balls and finish it. Man up and admit I'm right...literally, not figuratively like you.
find meaning IN it...not the meaning OF it.
I’m exaggerating to make a point about the voting public’s perception of the candidates. It doesn’t boil down to this in my mind. There’s more nuance to why I think they’re both POS unfit for office.
I really don’t think @blazers , @Heels Noir , @strummingram , @prlyles , @heelmanwilm and the rest of our Squad even care what is happening to our country. They’re either blissfully ignorant or they think our country deserves to be destroyed. Either way, I detest them.
You’re a fuking idiot. And I don’t say that lightly. There’s plenty of people I disagree with politically in here who I still recognize as being intelligent and educated and seemingly “good people”. You are not one of them. I criticize and make fun of peoples beliefs and their
According to Confustrummingham it's not our country.
You certainly are. It's probably due to the alternate reality you're living in.
God forbid you ever make the mistake of saying 'my country'.
Too bad he can't see her as well as he used too... and too bad it doesn't look like a happy marriage.
what, married a ten? Who doesn't know that?
BTW, it's y'all. Sorry to nitpick, but that one always annoys me.
