first of all, the plane has a reflective surface. Not as reflective as a polished mirror surface but reflective enough that reflected images should appear in the right circumstance. If you've ever been around a clean plane you know this.
Secondly, I'm not suggesting anything other than what I have posited. A better question might be what are you trying to read into what I have posited.
I saw a discussion, found a relatable item and brought it to the thread for no reason other than that it was pertinent and provided fuel for discussion. As I mentioned in my first post, there was a caption that for some reason didn't make it. If it had, it might have been more apparent that this is all I was doing (introducing someone's articulated question rather than using a picture to reinforce an opinion I didn't even express). I had no opinion on the matter, mostly because who gives a shit and because nothing reported is believable anyway..
THEN, however,
@blazers posed a question and I tried to answer it, partly wrongly as it turns out, and partly right. You might be conflating two things, one that I was adding fuel to the fire and then that I was addressing
@blazers ensuing question.. I was trying to answer blaze's question more technically, than argumentatively, even though I thought his supposition was incorrect. It was only because I thought it was incorrect that I addressed it, I wasn't trying to make any sort of claim because like I said, who gives a shit.