You’re the one brought up their goals.
The better option if they were honest is to not support him in the same manner they didnt support any other president they labeled “evil” for being “unchrist-like”
OOTB's Political Thread . ..
- Thread starter BillyL
- Start date
You’re the one brought up their goals.
The better option if they were honest is to not support him in the same manner they didnt support any other president they labeled “evil” for being “unchrist-like”
No I was referring to the use of EP. Why does it matter when it is used if it's completely legal?
He can plead the 5th. Are you serious that u didnt know that?
Clinton tried to block evidence in his trial via exec privilege. And the House took him to court and won.
Why does this Congress get to change the rules?
I have no idea, that Shokin shit is a mess. I'm sure that Trump either thinks they do or thinks they will if they investigate it further.
If you're trying to pull the "he was acting to protect America against a corrupt politician" then we're going to have to end the convo here cuz we're never going to agree and bickering back and forth will be pointless. I'm always going to think that Trump was protecting his own interests and his interests in the 2020 election against Biden more than any concern he'd ever have over how this impacted America.
You can think differently and that's fine, we'll agree to disagree.
But just so there is no confusion, I hope we get all of the witnesses.
Never said i didnt. But hes “different” right? The swamps been drained. He has nothing to hide. (Cough)
This is just not correct. The only way a prosecutor can question a defendant is if the defendant puts himself on the stand.
Do you even Matlock, bro?
Two seconds of internet research declare the impeachment "precedent" argument to be bullcrap. The 1999 Senate voted to have Monica Lewinsky and two Clinton aides provide private, videotaped depositions.
Back to my original question: why can't this be done for the current trial?
Back to my original question: why can't this be done for the current trial?
Every fricken one of them has something to hide. They all want to drain the swamp.
Yepp i do too
But both camps are so firmly entrenched they would just spin it to their benefit. Fuk the truth. My party wins or we burn it down!
I'm in @Terror Beard 's camp, as long as the party that benefits me the most, I don't give a shit.
You just spent 30 minutes of your vacation arguing that the Senate shouldn't call witnesses because it's never been done before. WTF.
throw trump in as well...cool with that?
I wouldn't call witnesses if I were them either. Neither of the Articles of Impeachment has a crime listed in it. High crimes and Misdemeanors. At least the Clinton Impeachment had felonies noted.
Omg can u imagine trump giving a depo like clinton did? It would be meme gold.
I appreciate y'all letting me know which of you have no principles and therefore should be ignored. Makes it easy to skim past your poasts.
That's why you vote for the candidate that represents policies you like. Why would I ever vote for someone that I disagreed with policy-wise?
This isnt about voting for someone. Its whether or not to impeach the president
What crimes are listed by the house in the Articles? We will have an impeachment every 4 years if we can impeach for anything.
I have principles, just not one's you like. I would suggest you don't vote for me.
Using the office for personal gain and obstruction of justice are the issues he was impeached over.
Why? I vote for who best represents my stand on issues. That's a pretty simple way to describe who I vote for.
Neither are crimes. Using the office for personal gain? Are you serious? Impeach the whole damn place then. Obstruction of congress? You ever heard of the judicial branch? That's where we go when there is a disagreement. If you don't think this is because they have a weak ass field running for President you truly are blinded.
Similar threads
