I love how people become stupid in hopes of furthering a baseless position. Who doesn't realize that countless innocent people have expediently pled wrongly when faced with being railroaded within our legal system? I'm not saying that that's the case with Flynn, I'm just saying it's disingenuous to try to claim it doesn't happen.
It's not like the good majority of this place doesn't know Billy frequents the ZZL Politics board.
It was a brave, heart-warming story; even if @strummingram has truly forgotten.
I haven't forgotten. You got the details mixed up. Apology accepted.
Right... that's a funny gif. He looks really stupid.well...if you were a lot smarter, you might look like this.
If you're the source of information? Absolutely.bluetoe said: ↑
"I clearly didn't say it was illegitimate, although it was"
LOL, this actually confuses you? Are you like this?
LOL, you might be even dumber than the other dummy. Care to show how I am talking out of both sides of my mouth? Or would you rather spare yourself the embarrassment of having your cluelessness exposed. .
try to wrap your few brain cells around this...it was illegitimate in that it had nothing to do with a President committing an offense so egregious that it warranted his removal from office. It was in fact nothing more than a detestable attempt to undermine an opponent they saw no chance of defeating otherwise. That is not the legitimate purpose of impeachment in our system. But you said I was talking out of both sides of my mouth, so now show me where I said it WAS legit. All I said in that regard prior to your 'talking out of both sides' post was in reply to YOUR strawman implication that I said it was illegitimate, when what I said was that it was an abortion. Saying it was an abortion is saying neither that it's legit or not legit. I pointed out that I didn't say it was illegitimate to foil your weakass strawman ploy (and that's generously giving you credit for being smart enough to even create a strawman), not to say anything about its legitimacy. Get a brain or your GED or both.
LOL, you're just a loser. You told me I talk out of both sides of my mouth, and when I show you up for that you call ME an asshole. I am probably as big an asshole as you say, but not for the reason you give. Justifiably showing you up for being the weenie that you are was the thrust of my post; and my comments on the legitimacy of the last impeachment abortion was simply a part of that substantiation, and nothing in way of defending 'orangeman'. That's a different subject than the one at hand (and one which I'm perfectly willing to discuss), and a convenient strawman for you. You're just a mindless blowhard prick who can only attack the messenger and create strawmen because you have nothing of actual substance to offer.
people like Stern can't comprehend that people who voted for Trump couldn't give a rat's ass whether Trump would invite them up to his penthouse for a drink or even throw a glance at them. We care about what our President is doing for us, and trying to do for us in spite of political obstructionism. To be honest, I wouldn't take my valuable free time and ask him in for lunch either. Liberals have the most moronic take on things, always based on feelings that are immaterial to anything that really matters.
He wouldn’t let you in his F’ing hotel, either.
what? No more ad hominem attacks and strawmen from you in place of actual discourse?
you're probably right but why does that matter? Could we maybe make a list of all the rich, successful people who are looking for the man on the street to mingle with?
