OOTB's Political Thread . ..
- Thread starter BillyL
- Start date
I just saw a documentary on the YT and they allege that Bobby Kennedy had a pretty heavy (and somewhat well-known) affair with Jackie Kennedy after JFK's death!
I think we share an affinity for what YouTube offers, but I always have my bullshit detector at full strength when I’m watching. For instance, there are more videos about every conspiracy theory known to man regarding the JFK assassination than you can shake a divining rod at, and every single one of them is pure fiction. For laughs I sometimes read the comments. In some ways it reminds me of this place.I just saw a documentary on the YT and they allege that Bobby Kennedy had a pretty heavy (and somewhat well-known) affair with Jackie Kennedy after JFK's death!
It wasn't a conspiracy about the assassination. It was more of a commentary about his wife and how she put up with his infidelities. I think they also had like 11 kids!!! Sheezus!
I understand, completely unrelated. The video about RFK that you mentioned is likely 100% true. Poor Ethel, a great woman to this day and I'm sure she was a fine wife and a good mother, but how does she begin to compete with Marilyn Monroe?
I was just saying not everything on YouTube is real, like this video, for example, and some of the comments are even dumber than the video itself:
Last edited:
The Kennedy’s were scumbags. All the way down the line.I just saw a documentary on the YT and they allege that Bobby Kennedy had a pretty heavy (and somewhat well-known) affair with Jackie Kennedy after JFK's death!
This is what will ultimately spell Donald Trump's demise:
18 U.S. Code, Section 793 Gathering, transmitting, or losing defense information
(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
Has Trump given a reason why he had the documents and
what he planned on doing with them in the first place?
Not that I'm aware of but given the individual, that is hardly surprising. I have a theory, however.
I think he stole the documents on his way out of the White House to one day use as a bargaining chip in his frivolous attempt to change the outcome of the 2020 election. I mean, come on, who really thinks he has held onto those documents all this time for the purpose of research? 🤣
It is well known that Trump was not very astute when it came to intel knowledge, and during briefings he was prone to distraction. James Clapper once called him "fact free" regarding his unbridled ignorance among the intelligence community.
Most people know that SAS is a racist POS. I don’t even watch ESPN anymore Since they became so political.
First, since you seem to care about such things, I apologize for not responding sooner, but was gone for most of the weekend in an internet "challenged" area. Second, I'd say that your 90% is grossly overestimated and that's part of the problem. There is a chunk of haters such as yourself that can only see orange and one conclusion. It's no different than those that always start with and see everything as race based so that they see racism in everything. There is also a chunk of lovers out there that would justify anything the pompous ass has or ever will do. But there is a much bigger chunk of people in between those points that see things on an issue by issue analysis that tend to lean one way or the other and even swing back and forth between elections.
I have no personal affinity for Donald Trump and have repeatedly bashed him on an individual behavior level here on this board (my posts speak for themselves). Thankfully, I'm not an eighth grade girl passing notes about boys and I have the capacity to distance myself from the narcistic asshole that orangeman is and discuss his policies about the role of government in our lives and our policies as a nation. Regardless of my personal feelings about his behavior and his treatment of other individuals, he is far superior to the progressive, far left agenda that is being doled out by Joe Biden's handlers. That you can't see this through the personal hatred and LTDS is part of the problem. This is not a yes or no issue despite your desire to see things in such simple terms.
Because you only think in terms of a dichotomy, you mistakenly view my comments on policies and my attack of the hypocrisy of the msm as a "quickness" of defending trump's personality. Not so shockingly, you would be wrong. Now, you'll have to excuse me, I'm going to watch my dvr of the game from last night.
I just want to leave this here in order to allow it the admiration it deserves. It won't change the attitude of someone who delights in obnoxiously using the childish term 'crotch remora' ad nauseum, but it eloquently expresses what I and others have said but don't have the patience to spell out so well.
Like you never resort to name-calling and telling blatant lies here. And you're old enough to know better! And the word is spelled n-a-u-s-e-a-m. Um, yeah.
I don't lie but I freely admit to using appropriate terms to describe someone. That isn't the same as your psychotic obsession with a term you keep using over and over because you think it gains you some kind of recognition. And it does. It is insanely stupid and obnoxious, as are you.
So speaking of being old enough to know better, are you not? That's what you are implying. I have wondered if you might be a fifteen year old, with the maturity you display.
no. You lie, and because I point it out and prove it, you are compelled to try to throw it off on me. Try all you want to, the liar is you. You are a patently dishonest person.
75% of the American people, and the rest of the world, can see Trump for who he is. The MAGAs can’t
No worries. We all do that way too often to each other on here even when it is mostly deserved. Sometimes we even do it just to tweak each other. Like, I have fun trying to pick on @blazers , but he knows that and he does it back, with no offense taken (I hope). It's just part of the fun and the point of message boards. At the end of the day, we just might - and this is the scary part - learn a thing or two when we actually listen to another's perspective.
just as @pooponduke tried to say, there are those who don't care what Trump is, because whatever he is is far better than anything the dems are going to try to impose on us; like the fiasco we have at the helm now. He also said there are those who no matter how or how many times it's explained, can do no better than putting people in one of two categories. He was talking about you among others.
not according to you, I'm not, so I think you know the answer. But did you even consider answering the question I asked, or did you just automatically go into deflection mode?
Pretty ironic and funny that you tried the 'know you are but what am I' BS on me regarding your honesty when I merely countered your accusation. But then you turn right around and do it yourself with the age question. I'm telling you, you are just dishonest to the bone. And oblivious.
Last edited:
I'm sorry but I wasn't paying a damn bit of attention to you. Can you repeat the question?
So Republicans are fumbling constantly down the stretch. Will they even win back the Hkuse at this rate
Maybe they will, maybe they won't, but this is all based on polling and reporting of polling. So, who knows. Gotta give the D's and their friends in the media credit, they've tried everything possible to slow the roll. We're still two months away. That's an eternity in politics and media.
Biden's approval rating right now is pretty high compared to quite a few other pres at the same time-period. If the economy improves at a decent clip then I think the House could be close. CookPolitical Report (Wasserman) still thinks R's take it.
Democrats haven’t done much to change things. It’s been more Republicans continuing to misstep on things like abortion and the burn pits bill for Vets.
Economy is gonna be shaky for another year though. We will see how it goes for him.
If so, he's an asshat for doing that.
At this point, Pelosi and Schumer are running the country and Pedo Pete is nothing more than a puppet being manipulated by them. Yet it takes the English or Fox to point it out. As usual, MSNBC, CBS, NBC, CNN don't talk about it because it reflects negatively on their liberal agenda. News is only news if they deem it to be so. Otherwise, they refuse to discuss it, relegating it to "non-news". Just as they've done with the Afghanistan fiasco/FBI corruption/exorbitant inflationary spending/the invasion at the southern border/Hunter's laptop/etc...
Similar threads
