While the Trump children all had teary eyes, it struck me as funny how happy and relieved Melania looked.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
While the Trump children all had teary eyes, it struck me as funny how happy and relieved Melania looked.
There are also anarchists who believe in capitalism with no gov.Subsidies are not socialism. Government ‘help’ being given to a privately owned business is not socialism.
Socialism is when the means and modes of production are collectively owned by the working proletariat instead of capital being privately owned. It’s about redefining the relationship between labor and capitol so that laborers own the product of their labor instead of selling that labor. It has nothing to do with the government giving out checks. There are socialists who are also anarchists. Government isn’t even a prerequisite of socialism.
You damned comma-nist-heathen sumbich!Subsidies are not socialism. Government ‘help’ being given to a privately owned business is not socialism.
Socialism is when the means and modes of production are collectively owned by the working proletariat instead of capital being privately owned. It’s about redefining the relationship between labor and capitol so that laborers own the product of their labor instead of selling that labor. It has nothing to do with the government giving out checks. There are socialists who are also anarchists. Government isn’t even a prerequisite of socialism.
And, we're off and running!There are also anarchists who believe in capitalism with no gov.
Gov "help" to a privately owned business (state capitalism?), esp long-term subsidies, seems closer to socialism than free market capitalism though.
no respect
There are also anarchists who believe in capitalism with no gov.
Gov "help" to a privately owned business (heading twd state capitalism?), esp long-term subsidies (farms, oil), seems closer to socialism than free market capitalism though.
Food market stability is obviously tops in importance.Well, its not.
Subsidies are a market based solution to a positive externality problem. Farms get subsidies because they cannot capture all of the benefit of providing everyone with food. So we give them a subsidy to make sure that supply doesn't dry up. Just like how taxes can be a deterrent to supplying goods that produce a negative externality.
There is no such thing as a "free market." It's a toy model used in Econ 101 to explain basic supply and demand dynamics. A truly free market would eventually result in a single monopolistic firm controlling the entire economy.
Food market stability is obviously tops in importance.
But if the farm (or coal industry) would fail without the gov subsidy, then don't the people/gov kinda "own" the farm or coal industry? Production is dictated. The laborers are getting cheaper energy and US has crazy cheap food.
I get it that the state doesn't directly "own" any of the above, but it seems close, hybrid'ish. I guess i'm just angry about airlines, banks and auto stuff (cronyISM).
Regarding the definition, "the relationship between labor and capitol so that laborers own the product of their labor instead of selling that labor" - i'm wrong, you're right
You don't think socialism can exist inside of a republic?Socialism exist. Some even embrace the concept. But we still are a republic.
I think I saw somewhere, that whoever the originator was of the whole site, movement, whatever it is, has basically come out and said it was almost a joke. It's almost like it was a stunt or prank that Andy Kaufman used to pull.Qanon now turning on trump. Saying he let them down and chickened out by refusing to declare martial law. Lol. Glorious
Socialism exist. Some even embrace the concept. But we still are a republic.
Completely antithetical to Marx, Engels, Trotsky, Lenin, Stalin, et al!You guys skipped right over an example that's close to state communism. We have state run prison work facilities where inmates are forced to work and earn like ten cents an hour. It's not exactly the gulags, but it isn't really much of a reform effort either.
The good ole USofA is under no immediate threat of becoming anything other than a corporate kleptocracy.
I've been telling my wife for the last year that Q is just some stoned out dude trolling these fools to see what crazy shit they would believe.I think I saw somewhere, that whoever the originator was of the whole site, movement, whatever it is, has basically come out and said it was almost a joke. It's almost like it was a stunt or prank that Andy Kaufman used to pull.
Yeah, this whole celebration is getting kinda old. Politicians in general don't deserve to be celebrated anyway. At the very least wait until he actually does something. It's not his fault though. Shockingly the media screwed this up. Hopefully it won't continue past tonight.I’ve heard “amazing grace” more times today than I have the last 20yrs
Read the 1st 2 words.You don't think socialism can exist inside of a republic?
There are some aspects that certain platforms push. Bernie is the 1st to come to mind. As quick as people are to jump onboard with the next big thing, it wouldnt take much for the good ole USofA to follow that path. Example: A former POTUS is facing a trial as part of an impeachment when he is now a private citizen. Impeachment purpose: To remove a sitting POTUS. We heard unity, unity, unity yesterday. If the trial continues, it will continue to alienate the 74 million who voted against Biden and for Trump. I use this as an example of mass following of a big event.You guys skipped right over an example that's close to state communism. We have state run prison work facilities where inmates are forced to work and earn like ten cents an hour. It's not exactly the gulags, but it isn't really much of a reform effort either.
The good ole USofA is under no immediate threat of becoming anything other than a corporate kleptocracy.
Can they send in the guard to squash this? I mean this goes against the unity theme of todayGoodbye chaos, hello old guy. Plenty of peace, dems exhaling, q crumbling, gop curious about reputation repair.
Then there is Portland
Can't we all just get along?Can they send in the guard to squash this?
Shockingly the media screwed this up. Hopefully it won't continue past tonight.
I think if calling white supremacists and other various nutjobs "right-wingers" is fine, then calling these racial justice and anti-fascist nutjobs "left-wingers" is fine. They're mirror images of each other.Doing there own thing
I think if calling white supremacists and other various nutjobs "right-wingers" is fine, then calling these racial justice and anti-fascist nutjobs "left-wingers" is fine. They're mirror images of each other.
only if we can then go Lincoln on them.If Portland wants to secede from the Union I don’t think the rest of the country would mind.
There are some aspects that certain platforms push. Bernie is the 1st to come to mind. As quick as people are to jump onboard with the next big thing, it wouldnt take much for the good ole USofA to follow that path. Example: A former POTUS is facing a trial as part of an impeachment when he is now a private citizen. Impeachment purpose: To remove a sitting POTUS. We heard unity, unity, unity yesterday. If the trial continues, it will continue to alienate the 74 million who voted against Biden and for Trump. I use this as an example of mass following of a big event.
If our elected officials sees they can gain more power thru socialism, communism, or whatever they will plan to follow that path. Politics only supports politics, not the people. We are pawns that funds their show
There are socialists who are also anarchists. Government isn’t even a prerequisite of socialism.
We agree!!! I would add "if it increases their wealth" to your statement of "gain more power." Whatever method works... but it's always about THEM first. It will always be that way. In America, it's most definitely in their best interest to avoid the labels like Communism and Socialism because of the reaction they evoke from the public.There are some aspects that certain platforms push. Bernie is the 1st to come to mind. As quick as people are to jump onboard with the next big thing, it wouldnt take much for the good ole USofA to follow that path. Example: A former POTUS is facing a trial as part of an impeachment when he is now a private citizen. Impeachment purpose: To remove a sitting POTUS. We heard unity, unity, unity yesterday. If the trial continues, it will continue to alienate the 74 million who voted against Biden and for Trump. I use this as an example of mass following of a big event.
If our elected officials sees they can gain more power thru socialism, communism, or whatever they will plan to follow that path. Politics only supports politics, not the people. We are pawns that funds their show