ADVERTISEMENT

OOTB's Political Thread . ..

Innocent enough if you ask me. The MAGA crowd sees this as an assassination threat:

Comey-Shells.png


but they see this as merely "anti-Biden merchandise":

shopping
shopping
0lsx-8646-classic-t-shirt-2-front-black-480px.png
shopping


You never saw the Biden DOJ getting their panties in a wad, but these Trump
sissy britches need something to whine about.
The not so subtle distinction you fail to see/acknowledge is the difference in position of the person creating or distributing the messages. The "anti-Biden merchandise" samples are from apparel manufacturers and distributers trying to make a buck. If there is no buyer or market for them, they wouldn't be sold. But what you need to do in order to compare equivalents is show us office holders, purportedly someone who supports our country and POTUS, who either market such merchandise or wear it.

Comey began his professional life as a clerk for a US Dist Ct judge. He started in the US Attorney's Office in 1987 (helping to prosecute the Gambino family), ultimately rising over the years to become Deputy Attorney General and then the Director of the FBI - that's the highest law enforcement position in our entire country. So, personal opinion is set aside and the duty to our country and things like the Office of the Presidency always come first.

A former mob prosecutor using the "86" reference knew exactly what it meant. But after the backlash, Comey showed his intestinal fortitude and power of his convictions by taking down the post and claiming he didn't mean exactly what he'd said. There's a big difference in the two situations you present. Am I saying that everyone should have gotten their panties in a twist? Not so much, but you're (typically) an idiot if you think the two scenarios you present are the same and that Comey should not have been taken to task for his actions. Nice try though, it was better than the majority of your efforts.

And, in most situations, it may have been "innocent enough", but this is a president that has had two actual assassination attempts and repeated political types calling for exactly that. Kid yourself all you want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nctransplant
"idolize" ?? LOL ... dont let your butt-hurt make you say silly things. support is a longggg way from idolize.
They know this, their agenda just doesn’t allow acknowledgement of it.
We're all happy for you that life (and I don't discount the hard work you've undoubtedly done and the wise personal decisions you made) has allowed you to be insulated from the rest of the country and the impact of inflation and crime. But, even pontificating from your non-urban perch, you've got to correlate an impact between political policies of cities run by a singular ideology for decades upon decades and their associated problems. There has to be some connection. The problem is that it will eventually impact you and your loved ones in some respect. This is not the time to go into hibernation.
Even the aristocracy in their ivory towers will eventually be undone by the lawlessness they condone. It just takes a little longer to reach them.
Typical drivel from the Blaze.
I mean, look at these ultrasounds (30 weeks) and this artist rendering (36 weeks) . How does anyone think this clump of cells is a baby? There is no pacifier, diaper, stuffed animals or even a crib for them to sleep in. That's not a baby.

If these pics don't convince you that abortion should be allowed up to the moment a birth certificate is officially recorded in the Government log book, I don't know what will.

30-week-ultrasound-3.jpg


images


pregnancy-w36.jpg
Drop mic!

99% of people that don't want liver failure could have prevented it by not drinking, but we don't ban liver transplants.
What a ridiculous analogy. Liver failure will kill you, pregnancy won’t except in a very small percentage of cases. But for Dems and PP, birth control would be even easier to obtain by being available OTC. Maybe that should be addressed. Fact is, birth control is readily available. Way too many choose to roll the dice and not avail themselves of it. Sad, but true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I mentioned earlier in a post that I believe that some democrats are glad the dust up happened on Jan 6th.
I don’t think there’s any doubt that they wanted the demonstration to get out of hand. Ergo, why extra LEO’s weren’t brought in in advance. It was orchestrated as much by Dems as by protesters.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Somewhere between 15-20 weeks for elective abortions seems reasonable. Of course that’s also contingent on having zero restrictions for medically necessary abortions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
The not so subtle distinction you fail to see/acknowledge is the difference in position of the person creating or distributing the messages. The "anti-Biden merchandise" samples are from apparel manufacturers and distributers trying to make a buck.
And I would argue that these merchants are comparatively going to some trouble designing, manufacturing, and marketing these wares while the customers are forking over real money for them.

All James Comey did was pull out his phone and take a photo of some shells in the sand.

Admit it, neither one shows intent to commit a crime, especially the murder of a president, but this is just another opportunity for you ignorant lightweights to play the victim card.
 
I made a specific point that I wasn't speaking for other people. And, you agreed... now, you're disagreeing with yourself. I'm impressed.
lol, you're so predictable. I knew you would try that. When I first said you weren't speaking for other people, it should have been obvious to any fairly intelligent person that I meant you weren't representing the view of other people by speaking in their place. So your argument becomes about semantics, as I knew it eventually would. It becomes the argument that losers choose out of desperation.

You try to speak FOR (in place of) other people all the time; you just don't speak honestly FOR them and their actual viewpoints...you would seldom have anything to argue if you didn't disingenuously misrepresent their POV's.

You have as much character as a maggot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
And I would argue that these merchants are comparatively going to some trouble designing, manufacturing, and marketing these wares while the customers are forking over real money for them.
But they aren't. They are spending about 10 seconds on their computer and the item is ready to be mass generated for the buying public. Those from all walks of life with no special training in the term other than they know it means to get rid of a president who was clearly gone already and now we find out he had cancer and they covered that up as well. And, btw, they did get rid of him, he ran for a second term and lost so badly that his own party staged a coup before his ass got handed to him. Finally, the phrasing and rhyming works much better for 46. You are trying too hard here to make the merchants something nefarious.
All James Comey did was pull out his phone and take a photo of some shells in the sand.
But that's a flat out lie. That's not all he did. First, that's his story - he just randomly stumbled across the shells in the sand - you can believe him if you choose to continue to delude yourself about this guy. Maybe that really is what happened. If he had just snapped the photo, laughed about it, AND STOPPED, that would have been fine. However, he's a former mob prosecutor who rose to be the Director of the FBI who is a darling of the msm because of his takes against the orange one. He then chose to post the picture on social media. All the world got to see it. He full well knew what it meant and what he was saying - about a president who has literally had multiple, actual attempts as well as plots to attempt to "86" him. There is no other reasonable manner in which to interpret it than Comey saying kill Trump. Then, to remove any doubt of the original action being a problem, instead of just trying to defend it and tell people to lighten up that it meant nothing like you are claiming, he had to take the post down. Thus, he did far more than simply take a picture as you want to assert. The bottom line is that if there was no intent, nothing wrong with it, and so on, there is absolutely no reason to take it down. You always seem to have almost no grasp on context. It matters.
Admit it, neither one shows intent to commit a crime, especially the murder of a president, but this is just another opportunity for you ignorant lightweights to play the victim card.
Yeah, you're right. Because no one ever calls for violence against government officials and office holders, particularly a sitting president. It's inconceivable to think that anyone would be stupid enough to listen to such rhetoric if it were to be used. I mean it would just be downright silly for anyone, lightweight or not, "to play the victim card" when it comes to such actions. It's not like anyone has ever tried such a thing within our own memories, right?

Do you know the actual definition of "victim"?
 
  • Like
Reactions: nctransplant
I know I was being clever. That's the difference. I'm not trying to disown it, dumbass.

When you have to go out of your way to point out that you think you're winning? That just means you're losing.
being clever and thinking that you're being clever is not the same thing....dumbass. Get someone to read it to you. I said when you thought you were being clever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Do you actually understand how sex and pregnancy works? If sexually active women were primarily relying on abortion as birth control then they’d end up needing them every couple of months. That isn’t a tenable solution physiologically or financially.

Shit happens. Women get pregnant even when they’re using birth control. Ectopic pregnancies happen. Miscarriages happen. Rape happens. There are countless reasons why women might elect or need to have an abortion and frankly it isn’t any of your business. And it certainly isn’t the government’s business.
do YOU?

First of all, you can shelve the irrelevant special cases that are usually covered in abortion laws even by States that might outright ban abortion. We are talking about abortions of convenience; certainly that was the topic when you stupidly jumped in. I suggest that a woman reset her priorities if the discarding of a human life conveniently allows her to continue an education. Is that education that important? Then do whatever it takes to avoid becoming pregnant, as the poster I was posting with had suggested, rather than relying on abortion.

So back to knowing how sex works, please explain how a woman can get pregnant by masturbating or giving and receiving oral sex. Sex does not have to be vaginal coitus. Maybe you weren't aware of that. If I was a woman and I wanted to avoid pregnancy at all costs while going to school, just plain forgoing sex altogether isn't the wildest idea ever. But complete abstinence isn't necessary. Regard for human life is, and when we routinely discard fetuses out of convenience and sorriness, we have degraded our society, . We in fact HAVE degraded our society by allowing abortion to become as routine as rearranging the furniture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
So the the US civilian radars and air traffic control radio towers infrastructure are falling apart. The new DOT Secretary has unveiled a plan to upgrade the radars to be modernized from 1980s technology.

WTF did obama and biden do for 12 f-ng years??? Trump had to deal with the wuhan virus for ~2 years, which shelved any big plans across the US. Biden and demoncrats blew like $7T on BS pork spending yet did not upgrade the required tools for the FAA and air traffic controllers for the busiest skies in the world.

This goes to show you demoncrats are a waste of O2, they do nothing but spend our tax dollars on BS which amounts to nothing but debt and weird projects like pushing for non-white males in the cockpit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nctransplant
lol, you're so predictable. I knew you would try that. When I first said you weren't speaking for other people, it should have been obvious to any fairly intelligent person that I meant you weren't representing the view of other people by speaking in their place. So your argument becomes about semantics, as I knew it eventually would. It becomes the argument that losers choose out of desperation.

You try to speak FOR (in place of) other people all the time; you just don't speak honestly FOR them and their actual viewpoints...you would seldom have anything to argue if you didn't disingenuously misrepresent their POV's.

You have as much character as a maggot.
Hell yeah
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
So the the US civilian radars and air traffic control radio towers infrastructure are falling apart. The new DOT Secretary has unveiled a plan to upgrade the radars to be modernized from 1980s technology.

WTF did obama and biden do for 12 f-ng years??? Trump had to deal with the wuhan virus for ~2 years, which shelved any big plans across the US. Biden and demoncrats blew like $7T on BS pork spending yet did not upgrade the required tools for the FAA and air traffic controllers for the busiest skies in the world.

This goes to show you demoncrats are a waste of O2, they do nothing but spend our tax dollars on BS which amounts to nothing but debt and weird projects like pushing for non-white males in the cockpit.
Planes are dropping out of the sky and disappearing from radar screens and we have some uneducated retard like you dispensing blame among the past several U.S. Presidents. Does it get more comical than that?

I will point out one egregious error in you error-laden post: Donald Trump did not have COVID to deal with for ~2 years. Not even close. Then again, a lot of people question if he ever responsibly dealt with it at all.
 
lol, you're so predictable. I knew you would try that. When I first said you weren't speaking for other people, it should have been obvious to any fairly intelligent person that I meant you weren't representing the view of other people by speaking in their place. So your argument becomes about semantics, as I knew it eventually would. It becomes the argument that losers choose out of desperation.

You try to speak FOR (in place of) other people all the time; you just don't speak honestly FOR them and their actual viewpoints...you would seldom have anything to argue if you didn't disingenuously misrepresent their POV's.

You have as much character as a maggot.
Man, I love getting under your skin.

Talk about predictable LOL
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Planes are dropping out of the sky and disappearing from radar screens and we have some uneducated retard like you dispensing blame among the past several U.S. Presidents. Does it get more comical than that?

I will point out one egregious error in you error-laden post: Donald Trump did not have COVID to deal with for ~2 years. Not even close. Then again, a lot of people question if he ever responsibly dealt with it at all.
Dumb****, it is the job of the USG to make sure the public transportation system is efficient and safe. obama and biden did nothing for 12 years, in fact dumb****....DEI BS ruined the FAA making the skies less safe by blocking qualified white male candidates from ATC schools.

Strange when that UNC grad crashed her helo into the AA airline on purpose or accident, left wing scum blamed it on DOGE FAA cuts which did not exist.

The Russia Collusion bullshit and wuhan virus bullshit pretty much put a dent in Trump accomplishing many things. Now he has a mandate from whipping your ass last November so he is making big plans to fix the USA. Which makes scum like you mad, go burn in hell asswipe.
 
Man, I love getting under your skin.

Talk about predictable LOL
getting under my skin and thinking you're getting under my skin is not the same thing. But we both know you don't even think you're getting under my skin. You're just doing what you always do, retreating into the inane because that's all you've got to offer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Remind me again of what question I was asked and I will do my best to answer it. And try to do it without butchering the King's English.

Damn, one word wrong and its a butchering? So, what would the ass whipping yall took in November be called?

Anyway, here is the post.

What is 'their fair share'? Is there a percentage or just an amount your ilk wants to impose? If its so fuggin important, why arent they left leaning billionaires offering to pay more? WHy doesnt Okrah, Dwayne Johnson, Bezos, Buffett, Jay Z, Dr. Dre, etc offer to pay more? Are you only pissed at the conservative billionaires? Why not millionaires too? At what dollar amount is the cut off for the 'pay your fair share' crying stop?
 
“Regard for human life is, and when we routinely discard fetuses out of convenience and sorriness, we have degraded our society, . We in fact HAVE degraded our society by allowing abortion to become as routine as rearranging the furniture.”

Couldn’t agree more @bluetoe . And in a society where the taking of an innocent preborn’s life is done so carelessly, why is it so hard for people to understand how a person can go out and murder 20 innocent children? It’s all a reflection of our growing disregard for the sanctity of human life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Planes are dropping out of the sky and disappearing from radar screens and we have some uneducated retard like you dispensing blame among the past several U.S. Presidents. Does it get more comical than that?

I will point out one egregious error in you error-laden post: Donald Trump did not have COVID to deal with for ~2 years. Not even close. Then again, a lot of people question if he ever responsibly dealt with it at all.
Why didn't your husband Pete Buttplug fix the issue? Oh he was busy giving birth.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: pooponduke
Damn, one word wrong and its a butchering? So, what would the ass whipping yall took in November be called?

Anyway, here is the post.

What is 'their fair share'? Is there a percentage or just an amount your ilk wants to impose? If its so fuggin important, why arent they left leaning billionaires offering to pay more? WHy doesnt Okrah, Dwayne Johnson, Bezos, Buffett, Jay Z, Dr. Dre, etc offer to pay more? Are you only pissed at the conservative billionaires? Why not millionaires too? At what dollar amount is the cut off for the 'pay your fair share' crying stop?
You'll get crickets on this question.
 
  • Love
Reactions: pooponduke
There are several examples, but the one that comes to mind at the moment is one of my own:

vic·tim
noun
MAGA lightweight who insists he is being unfairly picked on by superior intellectual forces.
Well, one thing I'll grant you is that you are 100% committed to the lib way of acting and addressing things. Don't like what a word actually means and get called out on how you used it? Simple, just change the definition and make it up as you go. Problem solved.

Except that the problem wasn't solved and all you've done is move the goalpost to fit your narrative rather than actually addressing the issue.

For example, in another post, you claim that "planes are dropping out of the sky" and that Trump somehow should have solved it in his two years that the country wasn't dealing with the Wuhan Flu. In large part, planes are just fine. Air travel is still statistically the second safest way to travel (elevators are the first) and if you look at the actual numbers on the NTSB's own website that tracks air accidents, things are just fine since Trump returned and consistent with norms (if not better) versus that which is your perception. The issue is that the ATC system keeps having glitches and it creates the potential and even likelihood that there are going to be some big incidents and issues. Despite the rhetoric of your Dbag leaders falsely claiming such things and the repetition of it in the msm, orange hitler has done nothing to change the ATC system from five months ago. These problems have been approaching for decades and the one thing that band aided over the issue was the wall of really skilled and highly competent workers who were its saving grace. Changing that one aspect, that the ATC workers must be skilled and highly competent, to a secondary issue while only emphasizing one's immutable characteristics was not the work of Donald but rather the agenda of the woke staff who surrounded autopen.

You'll undoubtedly find some mutilation of reality to somehow make this all his fault, but if you find you've got no clean clothes this morning, don't blame Donald that you've been too lazy to do the laundry.
 
  • Love
Reactions: nctransplant
getting under my skin and thinking you're getting under my skin is not the same thing. But we both know you don't even think you're getting under my skin. You're just doing what you always do, retreating into the inane because that's all you've got to offer.
Exactly, you would never spend this much time for somebody that doesn't get under your skin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
The thing that blows me away is this entire mindset of the D's, the media, and so on who want to act like it's all past history and we should just move forward while ignoring the continually emerging reality that they all covered up and pretended that our 46th president was just fine while in office (running for office, re-running for office, and so on). This is the biggest political scandal within my lifetime and I can remember Nixon resigning. Which only means that the coverup continues and the latest revelations only confirm it.

I have true empathy for Joe and what he is going to endure. The C word sucks and there is almost no one I know that hasn't been impacted by some form of it. My father died from it and my incredible wife has fought her own battles. It truly sucks. But I can feel that way while still recognizing the manipulation of us and how they are now using it to distract us from the issue above. Even within this shell game of don't look here, look over there, the deception and redirection emerges, however:

 
  • Like
Reactions: nctransplant
This one was from the BLM burn it/ loot it tour. The driver of this car made a believer out of those in the road.


Yeah, that one is different. That driver seemed to be looking for protesters to hit as they said the road was closed. I can’t support that.

However, if the road is open and you approach my car yelling and screaming, I will take that as a threat and I will mash the gas peddle and not swerve. It is on those protesting to get the f*ck out of my way.

On a related note, I can’t think of too many things I dislike more than protesting. Anything. On either side. I mean, get a life. Or step in front of my truck and lose yours.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
What is 'their fair share'? Is there a percentage or just an amount your ilk wants to impose? If its so fuggin important, why arent they left leaning billionaires offering to pay more? WHy doesnt Okrah, Dwayne Johnson, Bezos, Buffett, Jay Z, Dr. Dre, etc offer to pay more? Are you only pissed at the conservative billionaires? Why not millionaires too? At what dollar amount is the cut off for the 'pay your fair share' crying stop?
No wonder I didn't address the question -- it doesn't make any damn sense. Okrah? What the hell is that?
 
Yeah, that one is different. That driver seemed to be looking for protesters to hit as they said the road was closed. I can’t support that.

However, if the road is open and you approach my car yelling and screaming, I will take that as a threat and I will mash the gas peddle and not swerve. It is on those protesting to get the f*ck out of my way.

On a related note, I can’t think of too many things I dislike more than protesting. Anything. On either side. I mean, get a life. Or step in front of my truck and lose yours.

Actually that was the ABC version. That is not what happened. Driver didnt know the road was closed... he entered the highway where it was not blocked off.

Follow up clip..

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I have seen some strange reactions. Social media has really made it kind of funny and absurd. I see these famous, celebrity, hardcore pro-choice people sharing messages like "Let's all stand strong and stand together and we'll get through this hard time somehow." You'd think that everyone has been diagnosed with Parkinson's disease.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Exactly, you would never spend this much time for somebody that doesn't get under your skin.
Abortion has gotten under my skin, as has the fact that it underlies the disregard for human life that stupid people don't understand has pervaded our culture. Stupid people come out of the woodwork when controversy arises, such as the overturn of Roe v. Wade. SJW's like you get their dander up and have no idea what the issue really entails. As usual, you are just such a rebel without a clue and by posting nonsense you afford me the opportunity to express myself on the matter.

While I'm addressing your stupidity, might as well go ahead and get this out of the way. I am not against abortion in cases where termination is not for convenience or otherwise selfish reasons, as in the case of severe birth defects which would not just present a hardship for the parent(s) but for the child as well. Thought I'd mention that and get it out of the way and clarify that this doesn't mean I'm FOR abortion. It's the same as being for the death penalty but being against murder, a similar notion that your limited intellect has a hard time dealing with.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
i don’t know wtf you’re talking about, but it does make sense you posting a title from a link you haven’t read.
it also makes sense that a comment is made on the headline alone, since the current trend is to sum up the point being desired to be made in the headline, with the body of the article sometimes bearing information almost seemingly unrelated. If you comment on the body of the article, 75% of those reading your comment will have also only read the headline and they will have no idea what you are referring to..

I always read the article and that is how I know this. True story.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I mentioned earlier in a post that I believe that some democrats are glad the dust up happened on Jan 6th.
I'm not so sure that some politicians not named Donald didn't practically grease the wheels for it. Otherwise it's a little hard to explain why a politician with the initials NP charged with security oversight didn't call for adequate security in spite of warnings that added security might very well be needed. It's also hard to explain capitol police practically shooing some protesters into the Capitol.

I haven't watched the J6 hearings, but I trust this has been thoroughly investigated and revealed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Yeah, that one is different. That driver seemed to be looking for protesters to hit as they said the road was closed. I can’t support that.

However, if the road is open and you approach my car yelling and screaming, I will take that as a threat and I will mash the gas peddle and not swerve. It is on those protesting to get the f*ck out of my way.

On a related note, I can’t think of too many things I dislike more than protesting. Anything. On either side. I mean, get a life. Or step in front of my truck and lose yours.
I have to go ahead and say this. The guy was black and apparently a BLM guy himself. It does seem to be accidental, once the video is viewed with that in mind. He might get convicted of a careless and reckless kind of thing or maybe a lesser manslaughter kind of deal. But had the guy been white, that wouldn't matter. He would be charged with death by vehicle and buildings would still be burning from the peaceful protests over it.

It would be just another charge of driving while white.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
“Regard for human life is, and when we routinely discard fetuses out of convenience and sorriness, we have degraded our society, . We in fact HAVE degraded our society by allowing abortion to become as routine as rearranging the furniture.”

Couldn’t agree more @bluetoe . And in a society where the taking of an innocent preborn’s life is done so carelessly, why is it so hard for people to understand how a person can go out and murder 20 innocent children? It’s all a reflection of our growing disregard for the sanctity of human life.
excellent
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Abortion has gotten under my skin, as has the fact that it underlies the disregard for human life that stupid people don't understand has pervaded our culture. Stupid people come out of the woodwork when controversy arises, such as the overturn of Roe v. Wade. SJW's like you get their dander up and have no idea what the issue really entails. As usual, you are just such a rebel without a clue and by posting nonsense you afford me the opportunity to express myself on the matter.

While I'm addressing your stupidity, might as well go ahead and get this out of the way. I am not against abortion in cases where termination is not for convenience or otherwise selfish reasons, as in the case of severe birth defects which would not just present a hardship for the parent(s) but for the child as well. Thought I'd mention that and get it out of the way and clarify that this doesn't mean I'm FOR abortion. It's the same as being for the death penalty but being against murder, a similar notion that your limited intellect has a hard time dealing with.
Cool
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
iu


How can you look at this and say that’s not a baby?
I’m really interested in how any Pro Choicers out there could justify killing this baby unless it’s a case of rape or the woman’s physical life is in danger. Does that look like a ”bundle of insensate human tissue”, as someone on here described it? It’s inhumane to me. Even women should be able to understand that. Some states have attempted to make it legal for a woman to terminate the pregnancy right up to the moment of delivery, I think VA was one. So it’s a baby up until the mother decides to have an abortion, then it’s merely a bundle of human tissue? That makes no sense to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
i don’t know wtf you’re talking about, but it does make sense you posting a title from a link you haven’t read.

I took at glance at WRAL site..mainly to check the local weather and to see how many were killed in Durham on Fri/Sat. Saw the headline, didn't see the connection but didn't care enough to click on the article talking about a queer rally.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Those supporting abortion are some quality folks.


 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Apparently, you can still get one within 15 weeks anywhere.
Not without having to cross state lines. Bunches of states you can't get one performed unless the host's life is threatened.

Raped: too bad
Condom leaked and you're single & poor with no baby-daddy: too bad
Infant has genetic problem which will lead to major deformation: too bad

Of course most of the states already have horrible baby, maternal and child wellness metrics, like high infant mortality.

I'm sure those states will start pumping money into the foster-case system to shore that too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Abortion has gotten under my skin, ...

Tell me about it. Frankly, all liberal causes get under my skin and it's not just because they're liberal causes. Liberals just have a certain...je ne sais quoi that makes me loathe them and be more against their causes than I would be otherwise. And it's obviously not all liberals. Just the ones that are hysterical about causes. For example, I don't mind a liberal that just votes for liberals and liberal causes. I can't hate on them. I mean, I certainly don't like their choices but that's life. It's liberals that are loud and vocal about causes. It's the ones that protest. It's the ones that organize. Those are the loathsome liberals. I detest them so much that even in the rare occurrence I agree with them on a particular issue, the way they go about it pushes me farther from the cause and I almost change my own opinion because of how detestable they are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I’m really interested in how any Pro Choicers out there could justify killing this baby unless it’s a case of rape or the woman’s physical life is in danger. Does that look like a ”bundle of insensate human tissue”, as someone on here described it? It’s inhumane to me. Even women should be able to understand that. Some states have attempted to make it legal for a woman to terminate the pregnancy right up to the moment of delivery, I think VA was one. So it’s a baby up until the mother decides to have an abortion, then it’s merely a bundle of human tissue? That makes no sense to me.
I doubt anywhere here is going to justify 4 months, unless it was rape, the mother's life is at risk due to conditions, or the baby's wellness is at risk due to genetic deformity.

But the typical abortion is at 6 weeks. The fetus is the size of a pea and looks like:
6wk_pregnant.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I’m really interested in how any Pro Choicers out there could justify killing this baby unless it’s a case of rape or the woman’s physical life is in danger. Does that look like a ”bundle of insensate human tissue”, as someone on here described it? It’s inhumane to me. Even women should be able to understand that. Some states have attempted to make it legal for a woman to terminate the pregnancy right up to the moment of delivery, I think VA was one. So it’s a baby up until the mother decides to have an abortion, then it’s merely a bundle of human tissue? That makes no sense to me.
all that seems to matter to the women of the left is their 'right to choose'. There is little or no consideration for what exactly it is they are choosing. There is no consideration for legal process or the legality of what has been found to be a faulty action by a previous SCOTUS. There simply is no consideration period.

The mindlessness is staggering, especially when you consider that they have the right to vote.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT