you serious?…it’s written in the piece.
I didnt read the piece.. just saw the headline. Didnt see the connection between abortion and a queer celebration.
you serious?…it’s written in the piece.
The not so subtle distinction you fail to see/acknowledge is the difference in position of the person creating or distributing the messages. The "anti-Biden merchandise" samples are from apparel manufacturers and distributers trying to make a buck. If there is no buyer or market for them, they wouldn't be sold. But what you need to do in order to compare equivalents is show us office holders, purportedly someone who supports our country and POTUS, who either market such merchandise or wear it.Innocent enough if you ask me. The MAGA crowd sees this as an assassination threat:
![]()
but they see this as merely "anti-Biden merchandise":
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You never saw the Biden DOJ getting their panties in a wad, but these Trump
sissy britches need something to whine about.
They know this, their agenda just doesn’t allow acknowledgement of it."idolize" ?? LOL ... dont let your butt-hurt make you say silly things. support is a longggg way from idolize.
Even the aristocracy in their ivory towers will eventually be undone by the lawlessness they condone. It just takes a little longer to reach them.We're all happy for you that life (and I don't discount the hard work you've undoubtedly done and the wise personal decisions you made) has allowed you to be insulated from the rest of the country and the impact of inflation and crime. But, even pontificating from your non-urban perch, you've got to correlate an impact between political policies of cities run by a singular ideology for decades upon decades and their associated problems. There has to be some connection. The problem is that it will eventually impact you and your loved ones in some respect. This is not the time to go into hibernation.
Typical drivel from the Blaze.
Drop mic!I mean, look at these ultrasounds (30 weeks) and this artist rendering (36 weeks) . How does anyone think this clump of cells is a baby? There is no pacifier, diaper, stuffed animals or even a crib for them to sleep in. That's not a baby.
If these pics don't convince you that abortion should be allowed up to the moment a birth certificate is officially recorded in the Government log book, I don't know what will.
![]()
![]()
![]()
What a ridiculous analogy. Liver failure will kill you, pregnancy won’t except in a very small percentage of cases. But for Dems and PP, birth control would be even easier to obtain by being available OTC. Maybe that should be addressed. Fact is, birth control is readily available. Way too many choose to roll the dice and not avail themselves of it. Sad, but true.99% of people that don't want liver failure could have prevented it by not drinking, but we don't ban liver transplants.
I don’t think there’s any doubt that they wanted the demonstration to get out of hand. Ergo, why extra LEO’s weren’t brought in in advance. It was orchestrated as much by Dems as by protesters.I mentioned earlier in a post that I believe that some democrats are glad the dust up happened on Jan 6th.
Remind me again of what question I was asked and I will do my best to answer it. And try to do it without butchering the King's English.Answer the question or can you not support your statements?
And I would argue that these merchants are comparatively going to some trouble designing, manufacturing, and marketing these wares while the customers are forking over real money for them.The not so subtle distinction you fail to see/acknowledge is the difference in position of the person creating or distributing the messages. The "anti-Biden merchandise" samples are from apparel manufacturers and distributers trying to make a buck.
I don’t think there’s any doubt that they wanted the demonstration to get out of hand. Ergo, why extra LEO’s weren’t brought in in advance. It was much by Dems as by protesters.
lol, you're so predictable. I knew you would try that. When I first said you weren't speaking for other people, it should have been obvious to any fairly intelligent person that I meant you weren't representing the view of other people by speaking in their place. So your argument becomes about semantics, as I knew it eventually would. It becomes the argument that losers choose out of desperation.I made a specific point that I wasn't speaking for other people. And, you agreed... now, you're disagreeing with yourself. I'm impressed.
But they aren't. They are spending about 10 seconds on their computer and the item is ready to be mass generated for the buying public. Those from all walks of life with no special training in the term other than they know it means to get rid of a president who was clearly gone already and now we find out he had cancer and they covered that up as well. And, btw, they did get rid of him, he ran for a second term and lost so badly that his own party staged a coup before his ass got handed to him. Finally, the phrasing and rhyming works much better for 46. You are trying too hard here to make the merchants something nefarious.And I would argue that these merchants are comparatively going to some trouble designing, manufacturing, and marketing these wares while the customers are forking over real money for them.
But that's a flat out lie. That's not all he did. First, that's his story - he just randomly stumbled across the shells in the sand - you can believe him if you choose to continue to delude yourself about this guy. Maybe that really is what happened. If he had just snapped the photo, laughed about it, AND STOPPED, that would have been fine. However, he's a former mob prosecutor who rose to be the Director of the FBI who is a darling of the msm because of his takes against the orange one. He then chose to post the picture on social media. All the world got to see it. He full well knew what it meant and what he was saying - about a president who has literally had multiple, actual attempts as well as plots to attempt to "86" him. There is no other reasonable manner in which to interpret it than Comey saying kill Trump. Then, to remove any doubt of the original action being a problem, instead of just trying to defend it and tell people to lighten up that it meant nothing like you are claiming, he had to take the post down. Thus, he did far more than simply take a picture as you want to assert. The bottom line is that if there was no intent, nothing wrong with it, and so on, there is absolutely no reason to take it down. You always seem to have almost no grasp on context. It matters.All James Comey did was pull out his phone and take a photo of some shells in the sand.
Yeah, you're right. Because no one ever calls for violence against government officials and office holders, particularly a sitting president. It's inconceivable to think that anyone would be stupid enough to listen to such rhetoric if it were to be used. I mean it would just be downright silly for anyone, lightweight or not, "to play the victim card" when it comes to such actions. It's not like anyone has ever tried such a thing within our own memories, right?Admit it, neither one shows intent to commit a crime, especially the murder of a president, but this is just another opportunity for you ignorant lightweights to play the victim card.
being clever and thinking that you're being clever is not the same thing....dumbass. Get someone to read it to you. I said when you thought you were being clever.I know I was being clever. That's the difference. I'm not trying to disown it, dumbass.
When you have to go out of your way to point out that you think you're winning? That just means you're losing.
do YOU?Do you actually understand how sex and pregnancy works? If sexually active women were primarily relying on abortion as birth control then they’d end up needing them every couple of months. That isn’t a tenable solution physiologically or financially.
Shit happens. Women get pregnant even when they’re using birth control. Ectopic pregnancies happen. Miscarriages happen. Rape happens. There are countless reasons why women might elect or need to have an abortion and frankly it isn’t any of your business. And it certainly isn’t the government’s business.
Hell yeahlol, you're so predictable. I knew you would try that. When I first said you weren't speaking for other people, it should have been obvious to any fairly intelligent person that I meant you weren't representing the view of other people by speaking in their place. So your argument becomes about semantics, as I knew it eventually would. It becomes the argument that losers choose out of desperation.
You try to speak FOR (in place of) other people all the time; you just don't speak honestly FOR them and their actual viewpoints...you would seldom have anything to argue if you didn't disingenuously misrepresent their POV's.
You have as much character as a maggot.
There are several examples, but the one that comes to mind at the moment is one of my own:Do you know the actual definition of "victim"?
What did you say again?being clever and thinking that you're being clever is not the same thing....dumbass. Get someone to read it to you. I said when you thought you were being clever.
Planes are dropping out of the sky and disappearing from radar screens and we have some uneducated retard like you dispensing blame among the past several U.S. Presidents. Does it get more comical than that?So the the US civilian radars and air traffic control radio towers infrastructure are falling apart. The new DOT Secretary has unveiled a plan to upgrade the radars to be modernized from 1980s technology.
WTF did obama and biden do for 12 f-ng years??? Trump had to deal with the wuhan virus for ~2 years, which shelved any big plans across the US. Biden and demoncrats blew like $7T on BS pork spending yet did not upgrade the required tools for the FAA and air traffic controllers for the busiest skies in the world.
This goes to show you demoncrats are a waste of O2, they do nothing but spend our tax dollars on BS which amounts to nothing but debt and weird projects like pushing for non-white males in the cockpit.
Man, I love getting under your skin.lol, you're so predictable. I knew you would try that. When I first said you weren't speaking for other people, it should have been obvious to any fairly intelligent person that I meant you weren't representing the view of other people by speaking in their place. So your argument becomes about semantics, as I knew it eventually would. It becomes the argument that losers choose out of desperation.
You try to speak FOR (in place of) other people all the time; you just don't speak honestly FOR them and their actual viewpoints...you would seldom have anything to argue if you didn't disingenuously misrepresent their POV's.
You have as much character as a maggot.
Dumb****, it is the job of the USG to make sure the public transportation system is efficient and safe. obama and biden did nothing for 12 years, in fact dumb****....DEI BS ruined the FAA making the skies less safe by blocking qualified white male candidates from ATC schools.Planes are dropping out of the sky and disappearing from radar screens and we have some uneducated retard like you dispensing blame among the past several U.S. Presidents. Does it get more comical than that?
I will point out one egregious error in you error-laden post: Donald Trump did not have COVID to deal with for ~2 years. Not even close. Then again, a lot of people question if he ever responsibly dealt with it at all.
getting under my skin and thinking you're getting under my skin is not the same thing. But we both know you don't even think you're getting under my skin. You're just doing what you always do, retreating into the inane because that's all you've got to offer.Man, I love getting under your skin.
Talk about predictable LOL
Remind me again of what question I was asked and I will do my best to answer it. And try to do it without butchering the King's English.
Why didn't your husband Pete Buttplug fix the issue? Oh he was busy giving birth.Planes are dropping out of the sky and disappearing from radar screens and we have some uneducated retard like you dispensing blame among the past several U.S. Presidents. Does it get more comical than that?
I will point out one egregious error in you error-laden post: Donald Trump did not have COVID to deal with for ~2 years. Not even close. Then again, a lot of people question if he ever responsibly dealt with it at all.
You'll get crickets on this question.Damn, one word wrong and its a butchering? So, what would the ass whipping yall took in November be called?
Anyway, here is the post.
What is 'their fair share'? Is there a percentage or just an amount your ilk wants to impose? If its so fuggin important, why arent they left leaning billionaires offering to pay more? WHy doesnt Okrah, Dwayne Johnson, Bezos, Buffett, Jay Z, Dr. Dre, etc offer to pay more? Are you only pissed at the conservative billionaires? Why not millionaires too? At what dollar amount is the cut off for the 'pay your fair share' crying stop?
Well, one thing I'll grant you is that you are 100% committed to the lib way of acting and addressing things. Don't like what a word actually means and get called out on how you used it? Simple, just change the definition and make it up as you go. Problem solved.There are several examples, but the one that comes to mind at the moment is one of my own:
vic·tim
noun
MAGA lightweight who insists he is being unfairly picked on by superior intellectual forces.
Exactly, you would never spend this much time for somebody that doesn't get under your skin.getting under my skin and thinking you're getting under my skin is not the same thing. But we both know you don't even think you're getting under my skin. You're just doing what you always do, retreating into the inane because that's all you've got to offer.
Why so slow?
This one was from the BLM burn it/ loot it tour. The driver of this car made a believer out of those in the road.
No wonder I didn't address the question -- it doesn't make any damn sense. Okrah? What the hell is that?What is 'their fair share'? Is there a percentage or just an amount your ilk wants to impose? If its so fuggin important, why arent they left leaning billionaires offering to pay more? WHy doesnt Okrah, Dwayne Johnson, Bezos, Buffett, Jay Z, Dr. Dre, etc offer to pay more? Are you only pissed at the conservative billionaires? Why not millionaires too? At what dollar amount is the cut off for the 'pay your fair share' crying stop?
Yeah, that one is different. That driver seemed to be looking for protesters to hit as they said the road was closed. I can’t support that.
However, if the road is open and you approach my car yelling and screaming, I will take that as a threat and I will mash the gas peddle and not swerve. It is on those protesting to get the f*ck out of my way.
On a related note, I can’t think of too many things I dislike more than protesting. Anything. On either side. I mean, get a life. Or step in front of my truck and lose yours.
The day your stupid ass calls me out is the day you get your degree from Bumf*ck University. Go ahead, play the victim card again.Don't like what a word actually means and get called out on how you used it?
makes senseI didnt read the piece.. just saw the headline. Didnt see the connection between abortion and a queer celebration.
makes sense
i don’t know wtf you’re talking about, but it does make sense you posting a title from a link you haven’t read.I have read some comments from various abortion articles and several have wondered why the three dollar bills are concerned with abortion laws.
Abortion has gotten under my skin, as has the fact that it underlies the disregard for human life that stupid people don't understand has pervaded our culture. Stupid people come out of the woodwork when controversy arises, such as the overturn of Roe v. Wade. SJW's like you get their dander up and have no idea what the issue really entails. As usual, you are just such a rebel without a clue and by posting nonsense you afford me the opportunity to express myself on the matter.Exactly, you would never spend this much time for somebody that doesn't get under your skin.
says a woman had her ankle run over. Anyone who was run over by that vehicle was trying to commit suicide.
it also makes sense that a comment is made on the headline alone, since the current trend is to sum up the point being desired to be made in the headline, with the body of the article sometimes bearing information almost seemingly unrelated. If you comment on the body of the article, 75% of those reading your comment will have also only read the headline and they will have no idea what you are referring to..i don’t know wtf you’re talking about, but it does make sense you posting a title from a link you haven’t read.
I'm not so sure that some politicians not named Donald didn't practically grease the wheels for it. Otherwise it's a little hard to explain why a politician with the initials NP charged with security oversight didn't call for adequate security in spite of warnings that added security might very well be needed. It's also hard to explain capitol police practically shooing some protesters into the Capitol.I mentioned earlier in a post that I believe that some democrats are glad the dust up happened on Jan 6th.
I have to go ahead and say this. The guy was black and apparently a BLM guy himself. It does seem to be accidental, once the video is viewed with that in mind. He might get convicted of a careless and reckless kind of thing or maybe a lesser manslaughter kind of deal. But had the guy been white, that wouldn't matter. He would be charged with death by vehicle and buildings would still be burning from the peaceful protests over it.Yeah, that one is different. That driver seemed to be looking for protesters to hit as they said the road was closed. I can’t support that.
However, if the road is open and you approach my car yelling and screaming, I will take that as a threat and I will mash the gas peddle and not swerve. It is on those protesting to get the f*ck out of my way.
On a related note, I can’t think of too many things I dislike more than protesting. Anything. On either side. I mean, get a life. Or step in front of my truck and lose yours.
excellent“Regard for human life is, and when we routinely discard fetuses out of convenience and sorriness, we have degraded our society, . We in fact HAVE degraded our society by allowing abortion to become as routine as rearranging the furniture.”
Couldn’t agree more @bluetoe . And in a society where the taking of an innocent preborn’s life is done so carelessly, why is it so hard for people to understand how a person can go out and murder 20 innocent children? It’s all a reflection of our growing disregard for the sanctity of human life.
CoolAbortion has gotten under my skin, as has the fact that it underlies the disregard for human life that stupid people don't understand has pervaded our culture. Stupid people come out of the woodwork when controversy arises, such as the overturn of Roe v. Wade. SJW's like you get their dander up and have no idea what the issue really entails. As usual, you are just such a rebel without a clue and by posting nonsense you afford me the opportunity to express myself on the matter.
While I'm addressing your stupidity, might as well go ahead and get this out of the way. I am not against abortion in cases where termination is not for convenience or otherwise selfish reasons, as in the case of severe birth defects which would not just present a hardship for the parent(s) but for the child as well. Thought I'd mention that and get it out of the way and clarify that this doesn't mean I'm FOR abortion. It's the same as being for the death penalty but being against murder, a similar notion that your limited intellect has a hard time dealing with.
I’m really interested in how any Pro Choicers out there could justify killing this baby unless it’s a case of rape or the woman’s physical life is in danger. Does that look like a ”bundle of insensate human tissue”, as someone on here described it? It’s inhumane to me. Even women should be able to understand that. Some states have attempted to make it legal for a woman to terminate the pregnancy right up to the moment of delivery, I think VA was one. So it’s a baby up until the mother decides to have an abortion, then it’s merely a bundle of human tissue? That makes no sense to me.![]()
How can you look at this and say that’s not a baby?
i don’t know wtf you’re talking about, but it does make sense you posting a title from a link you haven’t read.
Not without having to cross state lines. Bunches of states you can't get one performed unless the host's life is threatened.Apparently, you can still get one within 15 weeks anywhere.
Abortion has gotten under my skin, ...
I doubt anywhere here is going to justify 4 months, unless it was rape, the mother's life is at risk due to conditions, or the baby's wellness is at risk due to genetic deformity.I’m really interested in how any Pro Choicers out there could justify killing this baby unless it’s a case of rape or the woman’s physical life is in danger. Does that look like a ”bundle of insensate human tissue”, as someone on here described it? It’s inhumane to me. Even women should be able to understand that. Some states have attempted to make it legal for a woman to terminate the pregnancy right up to the moment of delivery, I think VA was one. So it’s a baby up until the mother decides to have an abortion, then it’s merely a bundle of human tissue? That makes no sense to me.
all that seems to matter to the women of the left is their 'right to choose'. There is little or no consideration for what exactly it is they are choosing. There is no consideration for legal process or the legality of what has been found to be a faulty action by a previous SCOTUS. There simply is no consideration period.I’m really interested in how any Pro Choicers out there could justify killing this baby unless it’s a case of rape or the woman’s physical life is in danger. Does that look like a ”bundle of insensate human tissue”, as someone on here described it? It’s inhumane to me. Even women should be able to understand that. Some states have attempted to make it legal for a woman to terminate the pregnancy right up to the moment of delivery, I think VA was one. So it’s a baby up until the mother decides to have an abortion, then it’s merely a bundle of human tissue? That makes no sense to me.
Mostly because it can't live or breathe outside of its mother.![]()
How can you look at this and say that’s not a baby?