OOTB's Political Thread . ..
- Thread starter BillyL
- Start date
@poopondook never agreed that his comment was obscure enough to be translated any number of ways. The simple truth is you opened your piehole once too often in an attempt to rebuff @prlyles and you got busted in the process.
and? He's wrong. Many people are, both dems and anti-Trump republicans.
Why don't you be honest and acknowledge that 1) this bill wasn't necessary in order to help secure the border and that 2) the bill in question was NOT very suitable for that purpose.
watch this FULL video
THEN, I'll point out the obvious to you, which is to say that it is lunacy to contend that republicans are unwilling to vote to secure the border. If republicans weren't demanding it, the failed bill would never have been written. As it is at this point, any republican-generated legislature that adequately addresses the issue wouldn't likely get the support of even a single dem. Any dem-generated legislature would be written to further the dem agenda.
No one is saying that there have not been political considerations involved, but the basic problem with the bill in question was the bill itself.
And meanwhile, it would have been nice if the video you supplied wasn't truncated (not by you). Hmmm.
LMAO. You call that being busted? You did everything but lick my taint, and that's only because my balls got in the way.
And LMAO again, at how idiotic you are being to try to argue based on what @pooponduke didn't agree on. He agreed on what was necessary in order to counter your previous idiocy, which was to say that no one agreed with me. I'm pretty sure I didn't contend that his post was obscure in any way, so I'm not sure how he could have agreed on that. That doesn't keep you from trying to suggest it though, does it?
lol, if it wasn't for wishful thinking, you'd have no thoughts at all.
I just pointed out that only my balls getting in the way kept him from licking my taint. I failed to point out that your face was blocking the other avenue. My bad.
lol, I'm sure you'll be lying in bed watching this little fantasy of yours while you spank something else.
Every week the polls look a little better for Kamala the before. And every week Trump and his folks keep saying the quiet parts out loud.
Are you being serious? Jesus,…. These Kamala people are hilarious. Trump has the momentum. He’s going to win. By a good margin.
Dude. Lol.
This is literally what trump says to every question. Of course he also couples his answer with an imaginary quote from imaginary people to clown his uneducated marks.
Last edited:
Among voters between 18 and 29 years old, this is the group that turned out in record numbers in 2020 and which many pundits attribute as the primary reason Joe Biden was elected.
nice response. Spend a lot of time on that?
Are you really not aware that empty responses like yours is like saying 'yeah you're right but I just don't want to admit it'
Was she reading that from a teleprompter or being fed the answer through her earpiece-earring?
Last edited:
Tells you exactly how stupid young people are.Among voters between 18 and 29 years old, this is the group that turned out in record numbers in 2020 and which many pundits attribute as the primary reason Joe Biden was elected.
I doubt it. Libs create many of their lies spontaneously. That ability was developed out of need, and is now inherent to the ideology.
I'm sure your elders were saying the same thing about you back in the day. The only difference is they were correct.
lol dummy, what was posted was a clip of Kamala caught not knowing which end is up. What does Trump have to do with her stammering, witless, non-answer? Or are you saying that Trump says we just have to raise corporate taxes so they pay their 'fair share'?
Maybe you should be paying more attention to what goes on around you.
of course they were, speaking in generalities.. That's why it was so incredibly stupid that dems seriously suggested not that long ago that the voting age should be lowered to 'infant'.
Last edited:
lol, not ready for another ass-kicking? OK, we'll leave you alone until you say something else stupid. Which of course will probably be your very next utterance.
And just to give you something to think about, this is a message board; and on a message board, one needs no invitation to comment on a post. That's its purpose. The idea is though, that once you've invited yourself into a conversation, you shouldn't complain when you get your ass handed to you. It's a bad look.
You really thought this was funny or was somehow a positive comment about her?
This happens a lot more frequently than you might think, and on both sides. Just a month ago, for example, in late August I worked on a job for a D.C.-area production company, FP1 (fp1.com), on a conservative political ad consisting of "testimonials" bashing Kamala Harris and Josh Stein, and it featured paid actors reading scripted lines from -- you guessed it -- a teleprompter. It was every bit as counterfeit as the one you're sharing above.
Side note: Yes, it's true, I will work on jobs that in principle I disagree with. The entire crew was guilty of this. In fact, without the liberal film industry, Donald Trump and Republicans would have to hire people off the street to produce their commercials. What can we say other than we're whores for money. But hey, it was an amusing and almost enjoyable day on the job, especially since everyone there knows that Kamala Harris will be our next president and Josh Stein will be our next governor. No harm, no foul, right?
^ Of all the things that never happened, that never happened the most.
You think I would be admitting to working with right-wing media if it wasn't true?
you forgot the main point. Were those actors misrepresenting their political beliefs as were the actors in @pooponduke's example? If not, it was nowhere near being equally 'counterfeit' as you claim, but merely staged. I don't think it comes as a surprise to many that actors are paid to express their views from a script, and I'm not sure why it should matter what they are...you guessed it...reading from.. But there is actually a law or legal finding that says an actor can not misrepresent the actual use of a product or service. The difference between truth and lie tends to elude the common lib, so I think this could use a little moreThis happens a lot more frequently than you might think, and on both sides. Just a month ago, for example, in late August I worked on a job for a D.C.-area production company, FP1 (fp1.com), on a conservative political ad consisting of "testimonials" bashing Kamala Harris and Josh Stein, and it featured paid actors reading scripted lines from -- you guessed it -- a teleprompter. It was every bit as counterfeit as the one you're sharing above.
Side note: Yes, it's true, I will work on jobs that in principle I disagree with. The entire crew was guilty of this. In fact, without the liberal film industry, Donald Trump and Republicans would have to hire people off the street to produce their commercials. What can we say other than we're whores for money. But hey, it was an amusing and almost enjoyable day on the job, especially since everyone there knows that Kamala Harris will be our next president and Josh Stein will be our next governor. No harm, no foul, right?
No one cares or is shocked that those acting professionally set aside their politics to do so. We all have to do it. Why does that even need mentioning? On the other hand, I'm sure no one doubts that you're a whore, especially since you so strongly support one.
One of the actresses that day I've known and worked with for a number of years. I know her pretty well and I know for a fact that she's not a Trump supporter. For her at least, reading from a script that was written by a conservative political copywriter was anything but "expressing her views" and completely contradictory to her beliefs.
I added the teleprompter bit because a) it's true and b) because some of you like to insist that reading from a prompter demonstrates deception and chicanery.
well excuse me for having to explain the obvious again. Having to read from ANYTHING is deceptive when the discussion is supposed to be spontaneous. Teleprompter was specified before because in that case it happened to be a teleprompter that was involved. Index cards or cue cards or writing on the wall would all just as properly fit the bill.
But when an ad is being produced, reading a script (or taking cues) from any of the above devices is perfectly understandable. The sticking point, and the relevant point, is whether what is being voiced is true. Of course I'm not surprised that the woman you speak of who apparently practiced deceit for money is NOT a Trumper but very much seems to be just another lib whore to whom truth and honesty means little...
Similar threads
