Roy said they did get invited , but it was late. It was on a different interview. I can't remember what network.
I seen it to it was in the NCAA post game presser.
Roy said they did get invited , but it was late. It was on a different interview. I can't remember what network.
Good for Roy. This isn't about Republican/Democrat or right vs left. Its about refusing to normalize the fact that we have a russian clown puppet in the oval office.
Example:Polling is all about how you phrase the question. You ask/phrase it right and you can get the desired result. Polling is more about driving a narrative , especially with certain outlets.
SMH!!!!!
Yes to both questions.Example:
- Are you in favor of the innocent slaughter of helpless baby animals by humans? Yes or no?
- Are you in favor of performing medical testing on animals, in order to help develop cures for brutal human illnesses such as cancer? Yes or no?
Two very different ways to ask a question about the same topic.
Are you still going with this??? The polls had her WINNING the electoral college by a wide margin , in fact many were predicting a landslide of Reganesque proportions. Republican/Conservative pollsters couldn't even map out a victory in best case predictions. I think maybe you should stick to Canadian politics because obviously U.S. politics are just over your head. Hell , in our last argument my sarcastic remark about "passing it , to see what's in it" went completely over your head.Most polls had her with a 3-5% lead on election day. She won by 3%.
CC
I know its crazy right? What's even crazier is that the FBI has publicly disclosed their counter-intelligence investigation into Trump and his campaign, yet Trump supporters are still pretending this is fake news. SMH!!!
Didn't he choose not to go in '05 when Bush was in office?
THN11 gets it.Example:
- Are you in favor of the innocent slaughter of helpless baby animals by humans? Yes or no?
- Are you in favor of performing medical testing on animals, in order to help develop cures for brutal human illnesses such as cancer? Yes or no?
Two very different ways to ask a question about the same topic.
Example:
- Are you in favor of the innocent slaughter of helpless baby animals by humans? Yes or no?
- Are you in favor of performing medical testing on animals, in order to help develop cures for brutal human illnesses such as cancer? Yes or no?
Two very different ways to ask a question about the same topic.
This isn't about politics this is about the office
You do know Hillary lost , right? I love the demtard fairy tale about Trump and the Russians. Anybody with a speck of common sense knows the Russkies would rather go up against a weak Hillary , who will turn over more of the U.S. uranium supply to Russia , reduce nukes without reciprocation and possibly pass out during a crisis or just disappear. The Russkies fear a strong man like Trump.Good for Roy. This isn't about Republican/Democrat or right vs left. Its about refusing to normalize the fact that we have a russian clown puppet in the oval office.
Yep they have and they found nothing.I know its crazy right? What's even crazier is that the FBI has publicly disclosed their counter-intelligence investigation into Trump and his campaign, yet Trump supporters are still pretending this is fake news. SMH!!!
you mean like giving nukes to Iran and uranium to Russia and taking money from foreign governments? That kind of treason? Or do you mean illegal things like surveilling private citizens?.Yeah you're exactly right. Treason goes above bipartisan politics, and Republicans in the House should start acting like it.
Your reply proves that it is about dems/pub's or left/right. Lib way of pushing their adjenda in the name of rightGood for Roy. This isn't about Republican/Democrat or right vs left. Its about refusing to normalize the fact that we have a russian clown puppet in the oval office.
I heard something the other day, that made sense to me. There are so many white-hot-hatred haters of DJT, so many conspiring to take him down, from media, to Obama holdovers in CIA & FBI and congress - you think if they really had "the goods" and facts to take DJT down, that it would not have already happened? If there was really "fire" where they have manufactured the "smoke", they would've taken down DJT by sometime last October or early November**.I know its crazy right? What's even crazier is that the FBI has publicly disclosed their counter-intelligence investigation into Trump and his campaign, yet Trump supporters are still pretending this is fake news. SMH!!!
Stop using logic and common sense....it doesn't work with libtards.I heard something the other day, that made sense to me. There are so many white-hot-hatred haters of DJT, so many conspiring to take him down, from media, to Obama holdovers in CIA & FBI and congress - you think if they really had "the goods" and facts to take DJT down, that it would not have already happened? If there was really "fire" where they have manufactured the "smoke", they would've taken down DJT by sometime last October or early November**.
Plus, how having DJT in office is better for the Russians than having Clinton, I will never understand. She showed she was more than willing to roll over and go fetal position for anything they said or did.
** The benefit of taking DJT down with evidence BEFORE he is in office is - lets just for sake of argument say DJT were to be impeached now. Look at the Constitutional line of succession. You have to go literally about 15 office-holders deep in succession before you get to a democrat. And its not like constitutionally they can just have a "do over" election, or somehow award the presidency to HRC via forfeit, or vacating. Its not in the Constitution.
Yeah you're exactly right. Treason goes above bipartisan politics, and Republicans in the House should start acting like it.
I heard something the other day, that made sense to me. There are so many white-hot-hatred haters of DJT, so many conspiring to take him down, from media, to Obama holdovers in CIA & FBI and congress - you think if they really had "the goods" and facts to take DJT down, that it would not have already happened? If there was really "fire" where they have manufactured the "smoke", they would've taken down DJT by sometime last October or early November**.
Plus, how having DJT in office is better for the Russians than having Clinton, I will never understand. She showed she was more than willing to roll over and go fetal position for anything they said or did.
** The benefit of taking DJT down with evidence BEFORE he is in office is - lets just for sake of argument say DJT were to be impeached now. Look at the Constitutional line of succession. You have to go literally about 15 office-holders deep in succession before you get to a democrat. And its not like constitutionally they can just have a "do over" election, or somehow award the presidency to HRC via forfeit, or vacating. Its not in the Constitution.
I heard something the other day, that made sense to me. There are so many white-hot-hatred haters of DJT, so many conspiring to take him down, from media, to Obama holdovers in CIA & FBI and congress - you think if they really had "the goods" and facts to take DJT down, that it would not have already happened? If there was really "fire" where they have manufactured the "smoke", they would've taken down DJT by sometime last October or early November**.
Plus, how having DJT in office is better for the Russians than having Clinton, I will never understand. She showed she was more than willing to roll over and go fetal position for anything they said or did.
** The benefit of taking DJT down with evidence BEFORE he is in office is - lets just for sake of argument say DJT were to be impeached now. Look at the Constitutional line of succession. You have to go literally about 15 office-holders deep in succession before you get to a democrat. And its not like constitutionally they can just have a "do over" election, or somehow award the presidency to HRC via forfeit, or vacating. Its not in the Constitution.
This thread should likely get pulled. Just no upside to it. I don't come here for political nonsense as I'm sure many of you are in the boat with me.
No matter who is in office, I would attend out of respect for the country and what the office stands for.
For those INCLUDING myself who are selective in what we get offended or aggravated about, take a step back and chill. For every person or establishment we say we won't support because they are sexist, egotistical, liar, or whatever other "moral" reason we choose to incite, etc, there's just as many that we support that fit the same mold as those we despise whether we admit or or not. For every Person who hates Trump because he said he'd grab a woman by the pussy yet supported Bill Clinton and his escapades and even Hillary to an extent, evaluate yourself and your logic. Same can be said for those that support Trump even in his locker room talk yet chastise bill Clinton. It goes both way. For every person with a daughter that swears they'd kill somebody for calling their daughter a bitch, evaluate yourself next time you find enjoyment in Chris browns music or better yet purchase his song on iTunes. Same for all those that boycotted chick Fila when the ownership openly spoke about their opposition to same sex marriage. I bet some of y'all have enjoyed a #1 combo since then. I could go on for days. I think you guys get the point. Have your view and opinion. It's healthy and it's important. But your view is your view. Be consistent, thoughtful and intentional in how you expresss it. That can and should be respected. Picking and choosing how to apply it and using that as the only "right" template is trash. (Hops off soap box)
This thread should likely get pulled. Just no upside to it. I don't come here for political nonsense as I'm sure many of you are in the boat with me.
No matter who is in office, I would attend out of respect for the country and what the office stands for.
For those INCLUDING myself who are selective in what we get offended or aggravated about, take a step back and chill. For every person or establishment we say we won't support because they are sexist, egotistical, liar, or whatever other "moral" reason we choose to incite, etc, there's just as many that we support that fit the same mold as those we despise whether we admit or or not. For every Person who hates Trump because he said he'd grab a woman by the pussy yet supported Bill Clinton and his escapades and even Hillary to an extent, evaluate yourself and your logic. Same can be said for those that support Trump even in his locker room talk yet chastise bill Clinton. It goes both way. For every person with a daughter that swears they'd kill somebody for calling their daughter a bitch, evaluate yourself next time you find enjoyment in Chris browns music or better yet purchase his song on iTunes. Same for all those that boycotted chick Fila when the ownership openly spoke about their opposition to same sex marriage. I bet some of y'all have enjoyed a #1 combo since then. I could go on for days. I think you guys get the point. Have your view and opinion. It's healthy and it's important. But your view is your view. Be consistent, thoughtful and intentional in how you expresss it. That can and should be respected. Picking and choosing how to apply it and using that as the only "right" template is trash. (Hops off soap box)
Please flush this thread!
Are you still going with this??? The polls had her WINNING the electoral college by a wide margin , in fact many were predicting a landslide of Reganesque proportions. Republican/Conservative pollsters couldn't even map out a victory in best case predictions. I think maybe you should stick to Canadian politics because obviously U.S. politics are just over your head. Hell , in our last argument my sarcastic remark about "passing it , to see what's in it" went completely over your head.
Absolutely not! This is the best thread on here in years. like it or not this is a legit discussion about unc bball and its relationship to politics. Dont like it...DONT READ IT!
Now let's not get carried away.
It's already beginning it's inevitable dissolve into people flinging shit at their opposing sides.
Regardless, this belongs on OOTB.
Well... now, how much fun would THAT be???Has anybody pointed out yet that this is ENTIRELY speculation?
how are you accomplishing that by denying your team the privilege of a White House visit (regardless of who the POTUS is) ...you're contradicting yourself.
Seriously? Rasmussen? The joke of the industry? Ok...
I guess you are an expert on the polls too. LMFAO I notice you did put ? marks. Tell us what does your coach's mafia poll say.
LOL im sure our players are just dying to meet Donald Trump
Political Science....LMFAO Kind of like P.E. and Parks and Recreation.
Trump. **** that guy!