I am!!..love rawle but getting him will cause major problems..JJ has played himself in to a 4 year player..theo,Williams,Robinson,Woods..someone ain't going to be happy...chemistry wise..we don't need that!!..udoka is someone we need and can slide in the rotation very nicely!!I am not a big fan of UA but I'll be happy if we get him. Rather have Rawle.
I am not a big fan of UA but I'll be happy if we get him. Rather have Rawle.
Cuz he appears to be a project to me.I want both! Why would anyone not be a fan of a big who plays big? We need a little more mean and we need more bigs, what's not to want? Rawle provides the mean as well, but couples it with an excellent slashing game-both are needed.
Az would thrive in our system and he would get major minutes; I see a win for both him and us!
Giles would shatter like the little china doll that he is.The way it looks right now Giles will play the 5 for Duke next year. Wow, I'm just salivating seeing Udoka placing a hard foul on the top of Giles head. What a nice dream....
Top 25..McDonalds all American..project?..WOW !!Cuz he appears to be a project to me.
Top 25..McDonalds all American..project?..WOW !!
He is a project. A ton of MDAA's have been. UA doesn't have much of a game outside of 8 feet, it's something he is going to have to work on a lot wherever he goes.
Doesn't mean he isn't worth the work to develop him into the player he can become.
I agree with that. But jericho's statement seemed weird to me because isn't a project big better than no big at all? Or what if we waited until 2017 to sign a big and then he's a project? That's a year lost on developing a project big. Because we're not reeling in the OAD types which means whoever we sign will be a project on varying levels.
At worst, Udoka as a freshman, is a space eater offering rebounding, some rim protection and 5 fouls. Again, what's not to like?
We all have opinions!!He is a project. A ton of MDAA's have been. UA doesn't have much of a game outside of 8 feet, it's something he is going to have to work on a lot wherever he goes.
Doesn't mean he isn't worth the work to develop him into the player he can become.
I know Roy knows more than we do, but something about the Rawle recruitment scares me. We should be just coming off the whole NCAA crap, and then Rawle would be coming to campus. Makes my stomach turn a little. I think there is some shady stuff behind Mr. Alkins
Eh, he's no less shady than 90% of these kids ranked highly. The grades thing is a concern, but he will come with the same dumb baggage as most.
That said, it's great that we have kids like Jalek, Seventh, BRob, Bradley, and Leeky coming in that seem to have very strong families with virtually zero baggage. Can't have them all be like that though.
I'd rather get Rawle. Work with Bradley Maye Hicks and poss Meeks next year and get a big in the following class.I agree with that. But jericho's statement seemed weird to me because isn't a project big better than no big at all? Or what if we waited until 2017 to sign a big and then he's a project? That's a year lost on developing a project big. Because we're not reeling in the OAD types which means whoever we sign will be a project on varying levels.
At worst, Udoka as a freshman, is a space eater offering rebounding, some rim protection and 5 fouls. Again, what's not to like?
I'd rather get Rawle. Work with Bradley Maye Hicks and poss Meeks next year and get a big in the following class.
You are entitled to your opinion and me to mine. A project to me could end up like Meeks or James or Sean May or Whoever or so on. You don't know really know if it will come to fruition. I'd like to not hit another James jackpot.
TAKE IT TO THE BANK!!.... the only problem seen here is that both Meeks and Hicks could both very well be in the Nba next season...
I agree with that. But jericho's statement seemed weird to me because isn't a project big better than no big at all? Or what if we waited until 2017 to sign a big and then he's a project? That's a year lost on developing a project big. Because we're not reeling in the OAD types which means whoever we sign will be a project on varying levels.
At worst, Udoka as a freshman, is a space eater offering rebounding, some rim protection and 5 fouls. Again, what's not to like?
I'd rather get Rawle. Work with Bradley Maye Hicks and poss Meeks next year and get a big in the following class.
You are entitled to your opinion and me to mine. A project to me could end up like Meeks or James or Sean May or Whoever or so on. You don't know really know if it will come to fruition. I'd like to not hit another James jackpot.
Hicks is going to be a beast next year. Heck, he already is but we have other options which limits his numbers.
Doubt it..... the only problem seen here is that both Meeks and Hicks could both very well be in the Nba next season...
Alkins is trending toward St. John's. He will definitely be the "man" there for his one year.
Hicks has shown enough to be drafted at the end of the first round, IMO. Plus, I think he'll show well at the combine. I think it would be good for his development if he were to come back and show the ability to be a primary option, but the philosophy of today's NBA game makes him draftable if he were to entertain that (certainly more so than Meeks who is rumored to have one foot out the door). I think we'll be lucky to have him back next year. I've really appreciated Hicks' contributions this year.
We're disagreeing too much lately!
I've gone on very long winded arguments about Hicks' draft stock, but I do not see it getting above a 2nd round pick. The issue is that he's old. He still has a ton that he needs to develop to be even a rotation NBA player and most teams don't risk draft picks on 22 year olds that are still considered projects. Meeks has a much more polished game and he's a year younger. Different story.
Name a player that didn't/doesn't have something to work on in his game coming out of high school! The Wizard of Az is NOT a project, he simply has to gain skills he did not need in HS. Lebron James might be the only one close and he needed to get in better shape and learn to make his teammates better! Projects need multiple years to become effective like JJames (love this kid!). Az will grow very fast under Jonas, Roy and our coaches tutelage if he comes to UNC, he will contribute year 1, and in year 2 he will be a monster that is featured on opponents game plans!
Last 5 predictions have been for St. Johns including one from the very well respected Jerry Meyer. Things could very well change but I'm just going by what guys in the industry are saying.No he isn't. I'm not saying he's not going there, but he really isn't trending anywhere. He's put his recruitment on a bit of a pause to focus on the WOG season and (equally important) his SATs.
Based on Alkins last update, St Johns seems like the favored choice and UNC and NC State seemed like after thoughts. But, it was one update. I'll ignore it since I want him.Last 5 predictions have been for St. Johns including one from the very well respected Jerry Meyer. Things could very well change but I'm just going by what guys in the industry are saying.
St. Johns probably guaranteed him 75% of the shots they take. Wow has that program hit the skids or what? moo probably already guaranteed that to Dennis Smith.Based on Alkins last update, St Johns seems like the favored choice and UNC and NC State seemed like after thoughts. But, it was one update. I'll ignore it since I want him.
St. Johns probably guaranteed him 75% of the shots they take. Wow has that program hit the skids or what? moo probably already guaranteed that to Dennis Smith.
Tell me he won't develop very quickly, I dare any of you! (I will remember who you are if he comes here too, lol)
St. Johns probably guaranteed him 75% of the shots they take. Wow has that program hit the skids or what? moo probably already guaranteed that to Dennis Smith.