Too long, I only got as far as this part, which you have wrong:I think so many feel like they are being played, like lab rats being poked, by the mask medical experts / intelligentsia.
First from people like Fauci/ Birx / WHO / CDC: "masks don't work. Don't wear them". Then it shifted to "masks work. Always wear them." Then admission by any true scientist that most masks or face coverings absolutely can't stop the small microns from passing through the mask. All the masks really can stop is if someone has liquid spit or saliva leaving your mouth or nose.
And then, its been proven to be only transmittable by adult humans with symptoms. Not spreadable by kids or by asymptomatic adults.
Now - we're back to "wear two masks or maybe three - we'll update you on the correct number, based on how we feel week to week. Science! "
Was it Fauci or CDC or WHO who told Biden to say recently "nothing we do can stop the trajectory of the virus". Viruses gonna virus - which is the most accurate, scientific thing these "experts" have said yet.
They see these same experts blatantly and openly defy their own rules and mandates on mask wearing and lockdowns - which is so hypocritical - and again leads to people thinking they are owned sheep, with rules applying to them, but not to their master overlords.
I think people would be more willing to wear the masks if they knew there was a defined end in sight. Once this passes, then we can go back to mask free. Now the "experts" are saying, "nope. Continue to wear masks indefinitely - even if you've had COVID, recovered, and built up immunity. Even if you've had two doses of the vaccine. Enjoy - masks now, masks FOREVER MFERS!!!!" WTF?!
This control game, not based in science, but seemingly to many- is based in control, dehumanization, submission of animals, sheep - in their experiment - is what makes people defiant I think.
Obviously the virus is real. Nothing in any of the data in any state showing when mask mandates have gone in place - with even 95+% mask wearing compliance, have made a difference. In our state of MN, we have super high mask wearing compliance. The COVID cases spiked upward well after mandates were in place. Closely following nationwide second outbreak pattern, with no variation due to high mask wearing. Wearing the masks did nothing to mitigate, or reduce the spike, compared to more open, mask free states. MN over-tested in the state, and used a way too high cycle count in testing, leading to extremely high false positives, but recently that has been rectified - a story for a different day.
Is the 90% capacity higher than normal? I've seen data and stories saying hospitals need to be at 85-95% of capacity to make money. I don't think the 90% of capacity is such a problem. Nationwide, hospitalizations and deaths from (not "with") COVID have plummeted.
Again - I think you'd see mask wearing by the ones who don't wear them - if there were some clearer proof/ statistical evidence that they work and make a difference in reducing serious cases (there isn't) - and if the authorities could give a defined measure - if reached - where we could go back to normal, mask free (they won't).
FYI - by basically every measure, the more populous, older inhabitants in open FL / DeSantis have fared better then locked down, masked up, fkd up NY under Cuomo's regime.
That was interesting. Did you notice how the vapors flow from his mouth when he had nothing on his face, and then how the vapors are minimized when ANYTHING was on his face? Now, you could argue the overall effectiveness of the masks. But, it's pretty obvious that the vapors are less abundant with masks on the face. And, those are escaping vapors. If you are also wearing a mask, how much of what he exhaled are you inhaling from him? If neither of you have masks, it's a helluva lot more, and more direct. So, you see? Masks DO WORK! They're not foolproof and perfect, but it slows the spread.
Is that it? No Tik-Tok videos???Efficacy of face mask in preventing respiratory virus transmission: A systematic review and meta-analysis - PMC
Conflicting recommendations exist related to whether masks have a protective effect on the spread of respiratory viruses. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement was consulted to report this ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
That was interesting. Did you notice how the vapors flow from his mouth when he had nothing on his face, and then how the vapors are minimized when ANYTHING was on his face? Now, you could argue the overall effectiveness of the masks. But, it's pretty obvious that the vapors are less abundant with masks on the face. And, those are escaping vapors. If you are also wearing a mask, how much of what he exhaled are you inhaling from him? If neither of you have masks, it's a helluva lot more, and more direct. So, you see? Masks DO WORK! They're not foolproof and perfect, but it slows the spread.
KThen I think you should wear one if you want to wear one. No one is stopping you.
You linked a 160 page book from June 2020, is there a summary somewhere?This is an interesting take on the Coronavirus pandemic by 2 accomplished authors. It questions the testing and data used to justify our current countermeasures among other things. It’s good to read information on both sides of the equation. Maybe the truth is somewhere in between.![]()
Corona, False Alarm? - Chelsea Green Publishing
In Corona, False Alarm?, award-winning researchers Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi and Dr. Karina Reiss give clarity to these confusing and stressful times.www.chelseagreen.com
I decided to google that book and the authors.You linked a 160 page book from June 2020, is there a summary somewhere?
The testing definitely sucks, the tests have sensitivity issues, and the ability for governments to roll-out reliable testing for "community surveillance" as well as for patient/clinical diagnosis has sucked.
What do they say about countermeasures which was interesting?
Just out of curiosity what is your educational and work background?I still say the funniest thing I have read regarding masks is when someone said that masks are designed to keep people from spreading the virus.. they are not designed to keep people from getting the virus.
That was interesting. Did you notice how the vapors flow from his mouth when he had nothing on his face, and then how the vapors are minimized when ANYTHING was on his face? Now, you could argue the overall effectiveness of the masks. But, it's pretty obvious that the vapors are less abundant with masks on the face. And, those are escaping vapors. If you are also wearing a mask, how much of what he exhaled are you inhaling from him? If neither of you have masks, it's a helluva lot more, and more direct. So, you see? Masks DO WORK! They're not foolproof and perfect, but it slows the spread.
Just out of curiosity what is your educational and work background?
Holy shit! Scientific community (majority) agrees outdoors spread is incredibly rare, so how can a body of people at a University come to this conclusion? Surely that is some type of typo, or accident.
I quit school at the age of 7 .. starting working at a wall paper plant making road signs. Recently got a job at a local furniture store selling warranties on used cars. Right now I make about $5 an hour plus all the varnish I can drink.
The author is a PhD Biologist. That's science. What happened to trusting science?
Isn't that your tik-tok video?it's Berkeley - they havent been "people" in nearly 60 years. lets link a study done by psych ward patients next!!
About what I was guessing
libtards trust science when it benefits them to trust science and/or when the government tells them to trust science. it's a new class of Americans called "sheeple."
Isn't that your tik-tok video?
Well didnt Biden say they trust truth over facts? Or was he talking about.. you know.. the thing?
President Papaw is a retard. but hey, at least he's "presidential."
Yeah... the deep state has got me fooled, alright.could be, but it's accurate ... hard to argue with vapor amount and direction. keep on sheepin!
Aside for the letters, what's the difference between trusting science and trusting a scientist? What do you think people mean when referring to "trust science" vs "trust this scientist"?libtards trust science when it benefits them to trust science and/or when the government tells them to trust science. it's a new class of Americans called "sheeple."
You're just a sheep, dude.The people who don’t understand that masks catch water particles that carry smaller particles like COVID are going after Biden for his intelligence.
I suppose life would be terribly boring without irony
The people who don’t understand that masks catch water particles that carry smaller particles like COVID are going after Biden for his intelligence.
I suppose life would be terribly boring without irony
libtards trust science when it benefits them to trust science and/or when the government tells them to trust science. it's a new class of Americans called "sheeple."
So wouldnt the mask catch those smaller particles and keep them from entering someone wearing the mask?
Then you would have particles all over the outside of your mask to take home. And on your face, your clothes, or anywhere else. The idea is for everyone to wear a mask to catch the particles on the way out so that less of them get spread around in the first place. As much as I would like to be nice, this has been explained 50 times on this board so anybody who doesn't understand it at this point is a f*cking moron.
Next time you have surgery, tell the doctor he's a sheep for wearing his mask during the operation!Then you would have particles all over the outside of your mask to take home. And on your face, your clothes, or anywhere else. The idea is for everyone to wear a mask to catch the particles on the way out so that less of them get spread around in the first place. As much as I would like to be nice, this has been explained 50 times on this board so anybody who doesn't understand it at this point is a f*cking moron.