No question is stupid, Stupid. Maher is a pompous ass who thinks he knows everything. Fitton is totally biased but he requests FOI information that is in fact factual information.
Coronavirus
- Thread starter gteeitup
- Start date
Yeah, you tell those underling nurses what they should be thinking! After all, you're a doctor now.
He's not actually a doctor but he dated a black doctor once.
Or you can eat healthy, exercise and take vitamins and let your natural immunity do what it's meant to do.
But he still crosses the street when he sees black doctors coming down the sidewalk.
That certainly helps. Don't forget to pray and get right with Jesus.
I'm already right with Jesus. We speak frequently. And boy, you'd hate to hear the shit He was saying about you.
Hopefully, they'll eventually only be required to encourage people to take their vitamins.
Or how about they just treat sick people like they're paid to do? Sounds weird but I promise that's how it's supposed to be.
demonic entities at duke aren’t just k and his assistant coaches
You'd think @blazers, @strummingram and @prlyles would get tired of getting their ass handed to them but here they are gluttons for punishment. Except for @prlyles, he's in hiding.
I'm not endorsing mandatory vaccinations. But, if you are in the medical field, especially now, and you're quitting because you're afraid of a vaccine? Then, you were in the wrong profession to begin with.
I think yes to all that, but your last sentence isn't clear.
By "picking up" you mean you inhale enough load that your body actually contracts the disease (breakthru).
Yes, if vaxxed, if you inhale enough of a sicko's breath, your body could contract the disease (breakthru), be asymptomatic and be a spreader.
People have different immune systems (reactions) due to age, health, genetics, past diseases... everything. So some need more viral load to actually contract the disease than others (regardless of symptoms).
Cell size, shape & structure and characteristics are very different in each disease. Some small enough to be airborne, some aren't. Some die almost immediately outside the human body, some live on surfaces for hours. Some shaped in a manner making them more clingy. This is the case with Delta "It latches on more tightly to the host receptor, so transmission from person to person becomes much easier".
Some diseases might result in very little "viral load" (cell count) regardless of severity of symptoms, while in others the amt of viral load is directly related to symptoms.
Lots of permutations, so i think this is why with some diseases you are more contagious while symptomatic, but others that isn't the case.
context matters. She's referring to people that have contracted the illness via breakthru.
Wait…you talk with him too? I thought organized religion was stupid to you.
What's stupid is you trying to correlate Bill Maher with Tom Fitton. It's apples to cinder blocks.
Jesus is fervently opposed to organized religion. You must be talking to the wrong Jesus, again. Jesus H. Christ? You're supposed to be talking to Yeshuah.
No. I got the right one. Or maybe I don’t. But the one I got is giving me what I need so I guess I don’t care - afterlife, answering my prayers and the freedom to look down on you. I’m good.
Pretty sure @gunslingerdick talks to little 8lb 6oz baby Jesus, while you talk to Jesus Maher.
Last edited:
Based on that study:
Good news that natural immunity is a good defense. Sweet.
Bad news is that often getting natural immunity puts you and your family & neighbors in the hospital.
Luckily vaccines prevents the likelihood of the hospital part. They also prevent other severity meaning less spread.
no, I said 'pick up and immediately expel fresh pathogens' (as opposed to ones that are derived from an actual infection)'; and that is at the root of my question....if I inhale a load of pathogens, can't I turn around and deliver those pathogens to another individual WITHOUT actually having an infection myself? Assuming that to be a yes, and if there are antibodies in my system from a previous encounter, how is it determined that I passed the sickness on from a present infection?
No, you'd need to have an infection to produce.
Your body won't start producing viral load unless you actually contract the illness (you have a viral infection), symptom or no symptom.
Maybe you inhale stuff and nothing happens at all... not enough viral cells actually attached to your bodies receptors to be a blip on the radar. Maybe you inhale a ton and plenty attach but your immune system's T-cells, interferons, antibodies and all that shit quickly staves off any chance of large or spreading infection in your body. In both of these cases you aren't going to have much or any viral load in your nose/throat.
But if your body's immune system doesn't do a great job of fighting infection, then you'll be producing the cells, enough that you might pass them on. This is regardless of whether or not the infection makes you feel symptoms.
You'll work on "all that shit" when your patients show up, right? I don't want you to have to learn that the hard way, like me.
Antibodies would just mean that you had an infection or a vaccine (which actually did what Bill Gates claims it does).
I don't know the answer to the question about transmission likelihood of a vaxed person who later has an infection that really is being asked. However, I can put it in context I think. The CDC director's statement that bleed and others are referencing was provided as part of their justification of the mask mandate reversal. They changed their policy and had to justify it. This would seem to be a contradiction of the other cited data for getting a vax.
It's just a little of wanting it both ways. If vax stops transmission by a person who has a breakthrough (known, unknown, tested, not tested - it doesn't matter), it's one of the very good reasons to get vaxxed. BUT, it would also mean no need for masking. If it doesn't stop it, it removes one of the arguments for vaxing.
And, just for full disclosure, I say all that having been fully vaxed as early as they'd let me (as has everyone in my family except for one niece who had a confirmed case).
It's just a little of wanting it both ways. If vax stops transmission by a person who has a breakthrough (known, unknown, tested, not tested - it doesn't matter), it's one of the very good reasons to get vaxxed. BUT, it would also mean no need for masking. If it doesn't stop it, it removes one of the arguments for vaxing.
And, just for full disclosure, I say all that having been fully vaxed as early as they'd let me (as has everyone in my family except for one niece who had a confirmed case).
Knowing that breakthru can happen and a breakthru person can spread, it makes sense for people to be more careful (mask) if they're around old folks and unvaccinated people (kids).
ok, so now that you've told me what I already said I knew, how would you feel about answering the actual question?
Not even close. If you are going to continue your attempt at looking semi-intelligent at least know some basic scientific principles. Better yet let the grown-ups talk and you keep your piehole shut.
