I see we have a Hubert supporter on board..
Yeah, what the hell is he thinking supporting the guy who coaches our favorite team? What a weirdo.
I see we have a Hubert supporter on board..
Hubert was not my first choice ( UNC failed to ask my preference) but I will support him for a reasonable time to right this ship. I certainly don't think 24 games and yet to have his first recruiting class take the floor, is a reasonable time.
If he has not made substantial strides and has this program competing for the ACC Championship and a possible FF by 2024, then my mind may change.
I can still have things in the program that bother me, like his glowing endorsement of his players regardless of reality. But that is hardly a reason to call for his head in year one.
If you are trying to compare Hubert to Matt then you seriously have no idea what was going on with Matt.Doherty brought in huge classes and still couldn't win. So if Hubert is the same way, no I wont be happy. The whole reason we brought a new coach in here was to try to win, right? If you call this winning and you are happy with it, fine! But I am not happy with any coach that gets blown out by every tournament bound team they play whether they are new or not. That's inexcusable. Losing is one thing, getting blown out 5 times and barely beating the bottom feeders is another.
WoW, you really have little respect for Roy, I mean Hubert is the guy that Roy felt was best able to get this program back on strong footing, not Steve. I have not forgot Steve coaching FSU, it was not good.Based on the 5 that were considered.. Hubert, Wes, Coach Rob, King Rice and Stack.. my order would be Coach Rob by a lot, then King Rice or Wes on a coin flip, then Hubert then Stack a distant, distant 5th. Now outside the UNC family would have been many over any of those 5.
WoW, you really have little respect for Roy, I mean Hubert is the guy that Roy felt was best able to get this program back on strong footing, not Steve. I have not forgot Steve coaching FSU, it was not good.
One of the winningest coaches in basketball history with 3 national titles and he is overrated?Well I could counter with lets compare Coach Rob with Hubert's record.. but.. he didnt have one. As far as Roy.. to me he is the most over rated coach in the history of basketball. Not saying he is bad, just not what most claim when it comes to actual coaching. Talent is important for any coach to win but Roy was very talent dependent. For the most part he got what the team had..20-10 talent was going to be around 20-10.
Steve was 64-86 over all as head coach of FSU, he was 25-55 in the ACC. That is your guy?Well I could counter with lets compare Coach Rob with Hubert's record.. but.. he didnt have one. As far as Roy.. to me he is the most over rated coach in the history of basketball. Not saying he is bad, just not what most claim when it comes to actual coaching. Talent is important for any coach to win but Roy was very talent dependent. For the most part he got what the team had..20-10 talent was going to be around 20-10.
Good job. Offer more gems like this.As far as Roy.. to me he is the most over rated coach in the history of basketball.
Roy.. to me he is the most over rated coach in the history of basketball.
My feelings to a tee.Hubert was not my first choice ( UNC failed to ask my preference) but I will support him for a reasonable time to right this ship. I certainly don't think 24 games and yet to have his first recruiting class take the floor, is a reasonable time.
If he has not made substantial strides and has this program competing for the ACC Championship and a possible FF by 2024, then my mind may change.
I can still have things in the program that bother me, like his glowing endorsement of his players regardless of reality. But that is hardly a reason to call for his head in year one.
I put this Cat on ignore two years ago lol. I am ahead of the curve😎Good job. Offer more gems like this.
Excellent post. You and I have been on this board a long time and you always seem to have well thought out and reasonable takes.There are polarizing views on this topic for sure. Winning at Clemson hasn't always been a cupcake win, even when we had the streak in Chapel Hill. Good UNC teams have won close games there and even Ellington hit a late shot in OT and Barnes hit one at the buzzer to win with VERY good UNC teams. Like I said, UNC has a number of one possession or single digit wins at Clemson...as well as some other ACC programs that aren't powerhouses.
That really isn't relevant as much as some think. Winning on the road in the ACC is good, because even when UNC is down that brand still gets people's best effort. It's why we see so many people set career highs against us. It's not a fluke, it's getting extra pumped for playing that UNC jersey and brand.
I've found over the years that it's hard to change someone's mind once they have an opinion....unless the result changes. Right now we are all waiting to see what happens. I've also learned you can't tell someone who they feel is wrong as they are processing their feelings with real emotion. I would hope no true UNC fan wants Hubert to fail. Some, myself included, thought the hire wasn't the best hire. I expressed it at the time. This is a premium brand and I felt the search should not be limited to someone that played at or coached at UNC only.
For Hubert, you won't find someone that loves UNC much more than he does. Would I want my son (or daughter) to be mentored (life in general) by him, heck yeah. He's a Christian and seems as genuine as they come. But, so is my Mom and she wouldn't be a good UNC coach. Being a great man and having a love of UNC doesn't mean it's the right hire. It's a great addition part of it, but not the end all. I don't want a slimy guy at all, but the coach doesn't have to have played or coached here to ultimately love the school and win games.
It's easy to pick apart the things Hubert doesn't do well, but even Roy (and Dean) had their faults too. No human is perfect. I hope it works out for sure. When I look at the record, I can say he's doing better or at the level I expected. When I look at the state of the ACC and how good teams are, I can say I think he's underachieving. I don't expect UNC to get blown out by 20+ very often and we have the talent that unless we play the absolute best teams, that should not happen. That's a mix of coaching and execution and both have been failures at points of the year.
I do think Hubert will be given a chance to see what he can do and that's probably fair. I just don't like being mediocre/bad like we've been the last 3 years. That's not UNC basketball.
The last time I rooted for Duke was in ‘78 when UK’s Goose Givens lit up Gminski, Spanarkel, etc… for 41 points. Before long, the vampire arrived and I’ve not rooted for them since.I actually rooted for Dook in that game because I hated IU more than Dook at that time. IU woukd have beaten UK in the FF and won it all that year. I needed Dook to beat IU.
WOW has time shifted over the years.
I grew up and still live in Southern Indiana. Probably 75% IU fans here, 15 % UK then everyone else at that time. I HATED IU because of the " Bob Knight can do no wrong" fanbase.The last time I rooted for Duke was in ‘78 when UK’s Goose Givens lit up Gminski, Spanarkel, etc… up for 41 points. Before long, the vampire arrived and I’ve not rooted for them since.
Here's some more numbers to compare Roy and Hubert's first year. I think a good conclusion to draw is that it's a bad comparison upon closer examination.In Roy's first season the ACC had 6 teams (out of 9) that finished season in Top 20. Definitely more of a meat grinder than today.
Roy | Hubert | ||||||
SOS | #5 | #27 | |||||
Conference RPI | #1 | #7 | |||||
ACC tournament teams | 6 (of 9) | 5 (of 15) projected | |||||
Notable wins |
| Michigan | |||||
Average margin of defeat | 5.4 | 18.6 |
No, man, we're GOOD. This team can go places!!! Don't let the fact that we've been curb stomped by every good team we've played fool you. We GOOD!! LMAODo you think we would be only a half game behind in past years with this team? Half game out of 1st place yet in question about making the tournament. That should tell you how weak the conference is.
Why would you bring facts to the board? That goes against the narrative of some.Here's some more numbers to compare Roy and Hubert's first year. I think a good conclusion to draw is that it's a bad comparison upon closer examination.
Roy Hubert SOS #5 #27 Conference RPI #1 #7 ACC tournament teams 6 (of 9) 5 (of 15) projected Notable wins
#23 Illinois #16 GT #5 UConn #20 WF #17 moo Michigan Average margin of defeat 5.4 18.6
Yes it is, and rumors are swirling we are going to see several unhappy players transfer once the season ends.put me in the styles needs more minutes column…it’s ridiculous the way hubert handles his lineups.
it might be a blessing…i know we all support the program, but the first gig at this point in the stage of cbb, it’s a lot to take on.Hubert slowly but surely running this into the ground. Sadly, I honestly don’t think he realizes it.
Rumors can be on the mark or completely off base. I don’t like to speculate about specific players transferring beforehand. I still believe Kessler would have been here if not for Roy’s blinders when it came to Brooks, but it’s water under the proverbial bridge.
Nonspecifically, I do believe the Stargate portal will play a major role in the off-season. Unfortunately, that’s college sports in 2022. Little to no school loyalty, show me the money. It’s eroded most of the enjoyment I used to get from being a fan.
Keep'em coming.The only reason Roy played Brooks so much is because Brooks was a social justice warrior.
Keep'em coming.
You saying Brooks was not a social justice warrior?
I saidYou saying Brooks was not a social justice warrior?
You're making some of the most ridiculous comments I've seen in a while.Keep'em coming.
I like most of your poasts and we often see things the same way. But you will alienate me and many others if you continue with this nonsensical Roy bashing. I mean, this one isn't so bad and I get what you're driving at even though I think you're wrong. Roy played Brooks because he fit next to Armando/Sharpe better than Kessler did. And Kessler's defensive positioning was terrible last year and because Brooks had been in the program a while, he did things the way Roy liked. That's why Roy played Brooks over Kessler - better fit and Brooks played the way Roy wanted. That's it. I can almost guarantee it had little or nothing to do with Brooks being a SJW.
But that comment about Roy being overrated is not only ridiculously stupid but seemed like something you said in an effort just to troll. No one believes that. Literally no one. And certainly no Carolina fan believes that. You mentioned Roy having to have talent, well, duh. Every coach needs talent. But if you dig further into things, you'll see Roy has done a lot of winning with second tier talent. How many of Roy's guys went on to be NBA stars? Zero. Roy was maximizing second tier talent and beating teams with future NBA all-star level talent with second tier talent.
Roy has really been a system coach and team coach vs. Individual. One can argue that the success he's had WITHOUT NBA stars shows he's actually a better coach.If there was ranking of the top 200 ncaa basketball coaches of all time, most would put Roy in the top 5. Based on his coaching decisions I would have him in the 12th to 15th range. People read my post and take it as me saying Roy was a terrible coach.. I just dont think he was as good as most think when it comes to in game coaching.
You mentioned guys not becoming NBA stars.. that could be on player development while in college. Several players came to UNC highly ranked and just didnt seem to improve over their career.
Sharpe should have been getting Brooks minutes in my opinion. If I recall Sharpe averaged about the same points per game as Brooks in 10 less minutes.
If there was ranking of the top 200 ncaa basketball coaches of all time, most would put Roy in the top 5. Based on his coaching decisions I would have him in the 12th to 15th range. People read my post and take it as me saying Roy was a terrible coach.. I just dont think he was as good as most think when it comes to in game coaching.
You mentioned guys not becoming NBA stars.. that could be on player development while in college. Several players came to UNC highly ranked and just didnt seem to improve over their career.
Sharpe should have been getting Brooks minutes in my opinion. If I recall Sharpe averaged about the same points per game as Brooks in 10 less minutes.
It's pretty challenging on who are the top 5 coaches. I guess it really depends on what your metric is for top coach. Wins? Championships? Coaching tree? Influence on the sport?K, Wooden, Dean, Knight, and Rupp. I’ll allow those. Please name the others you think would even be in the discussion and I will happily lay out why they are not.
And while some of the recruits Roy has brought in were “highly ranked”, none were seen as generational talents or sure fire NBA guys. Maybe BWright? He left after one year. How much development can there be? Maybe Barnes? He’s been an above average player for a decade and a starter on a world championship team. Who else? Felton? He was borderline All-Star level at his peak and played over 15 years in the NBA. Not all recruiting classes are created equal. And Roy never signed the uber elite. It just didn’t fit his system.
I maintain that Roy did more with less.
In regards to last year, was Sharpe going to chase stretch 4s around while on the court with Bacot? Brooks was more suited for that.
Roy is Top 4-5 in wins, Final Fours, Titles and winning %. His results are there. We aren’t talking about a sport that is 300 years old either. Most of the success in college basketball as we know it has been seen in the last 60-70 years. Most before that the game was in its infancy.It's pretty challenging on who are the top 5 coaches. I guess it really depends on what your metric is for top coach. Wins? Championships? Coaching tree? Influence on the sport?
I don't hear many say Roy is a top 5 coach - in fact, I don't think I've seen anyone say that. He's widely respected and an all time great, but I think most have him in the top 10-20.
You must be listening to the wrong people, because he's mentioned pretty consistently in the top 10.It's pretty challenging on who are the top 5 coaches. I guess it really depends on what your metric is for top coach. Wins? Championships? Coaching tree? Influence on the sport?
I don't hear many say Roy is a top 5 coach - in fact, I don't think I've seen anyone say that. He's widely respected and an all time great, but I think most have him in the top 10-20.
He might not be top 5, but he sure as Heel is top 10.You must be listening to the wrong people, because he's mentioned pretty consistently in the top 10.
This exactly. Roy is a great coach all time, no doubt about it. But would someone rank him above, say, Henry Iba, who has fewer wins but arguably a greater impact on the sport?It's hard to make a top 5 or top 10 in any field. It comes down to what and who you like and what era you're talking about.