really? Then why did you make a point of saying I was just supporting my 'teammate'? That would be the now, and my rebuttal was pointing out the then, well before there was a 'teammate' to defend. I know this is pretty heady stuff for to follow, maybe you should just stick to mindless virtue-signaling.
Are you keeping score? I'm not, but I know my half brain is kicking your complete brain's ass...so to speak.
there you go just making shit up again. That's what you have to do because you never have an argument otherwise. The school did not help cover things up, and I would love it if you identified the few who you say did. I'll gladly help you castigate them.
If there was a question of whether Dean handled it properly once he was informed of the possibility, the average human being who was a fan would defend him because he would seem to be above any wrongdoing. Paterno reported the rumor that he heard to the right authority, and then washed his hands of it all. His 'crime' was in not following up to make sure nothing was actually going on. I was at the top of the pile calling for his head, not that you care about then or now or anything but your opportunity to virtue-signal. VERY few people even knew that Sandusky MIGHT be committing horrible behavior.
THREE people beyond Sandusky and Paterno were involved in and charged with covering up and lying to investigators. That's an entire school in your deranged mind. You're just a virtue-signaling goofball.
LMAO at the notion you present that I am the one twisting myself into a knot, when you are the one struggling to justify condemning an entire school for nothing it was complicit in.