OOTB's Political Thread . ..

[tarheel0910]

This article feels very appropriate for the board.

Yale research: Highly successful people argue differently

People "arguing to win" took a hard line and only saw one right answer, Yale research from 2016 found. There's a better way to debate, says researcher Matthew Fisher.

www.cnbc.com

 

[randman1]

Blair talks of ramping up the killing machine to new heights.

'Pure Evil' -- Tony Blair Calls for Digital Vaccine Tracking at Davos

Tony Blair said that global "digital infrastructures" are needed to monitor who is vaccinated as he predicted a "slew" of new vaccines.

www.breitbart.com

 

[randman1]

The Delaware Sopranos

Newt Gingrich Calls Biden Family ‘The Delaware Sopranos’

Newt Gingrich said this week that an uncanny parallel can be drawn between the Biden family and the fictional HBO series "The Sopranos."

www.breitbart.com

 

[bluetoe]

Trump may have said he held back on being honest with the American people for our own good, but what kind of harebrained logic is that when holding back only makes matters worse? That's where the poor leadership comes into play. He wasn't fooling anybody with that excuse except for gullible suckers like you, and the 2020 election outcome is proof of it.

In reality, Trump knew it could be very costly to him politically to tell the truth so he made a major miscalculation by lying to us instead. Of course, you're such a Trump apologist that you choose to describe such miscalculations and lies as "inconsequential."


Only cavemen and sore losers are still election deniers at this point. Are you going to remain a foolish jackass for the rest of your life?

there's almost too much idiocy here to properly dismiss.

If we had held back, we would have seen that fatalities would have been lower than the hysterics anticipated and that our economy wouldn't have been made such shambles of.

Trump isn't stupid, but you are if you believe he thought that he could conceal for political purposes the impact of an epidemic. He downplayed it, he didn't futilely attack it with torches and pitchforks as you would have us believe he should have.....because unlike simps like you, he recognized the futility of overreacting.

You're so hell bent on rationalizing idiocy that you can't even think straight. Go back and read what I said about those stupid enough to have voted in the jackass who is now our president. Those who now try to justify those votes by making the previous president seem even worse, are just simpletons.

translation for @Heels Noir; you're a simpleton.

 

[bluetoe]

This article feels very appropriate for the board.

Yale research: Highly successful people argue differently

People "arguing to win" took a hard line and only saw one right answer, Yale research from 2016 found. There's a better way to debate, says researcher Matthew Fisher.

www.cnbc.com

dude. Seriously?

 

[bluetoe]

It was a great WOB.

help me out here. It was a great what, 'waste of breath'?

 

[tarheel0910]

dude. Seriously?

dude. What? You don't think it's representative of the board?

 

[bluetoe]

dude. What? You don't think it's representative of the board?

I apologize. I know you're actually right to say that what is being said applies to this board. It wasn't that you presented it, it's the content that made me scoff.

By saying it's appropriate for the board (your original contention), I have to assume that you mean the board should take it to heart. The people here aren't trying to find the truth by engaging in meaningful back-and-forth, nor are they trying to cultivate brotherhood in this thread. We aren't debating in the collegiate sense. We do not seek any common understanding.

We are here to employ standard rhetoric. We are two rival groups of chimps throwing sticks and dung at each other.

The people here understand that we have an impasse of polarization and we know that our beliefs are far different than those other beliefs. We are here to throw stones because that's the only way to deal with the insanity presented by the other side.

If you just mean that it applies to the board, it's insulting because it's the kind of drivel you feed to fifth graders in a civics class.

 

[prlyles]

help me out here. It was a great what, 'waste of breath'?

Go to some of the more popular Rival’s forums, they’ll explain.

 

[Heels Noir]

We are two rival groups of chimps throwing sticks and dung at each other.

Speak for yourself, you big ape.

 

[blazers]

I apologize. I know you're actually right to say that what is being said applies to this board. It wasn't that you presented it, it's the content that made me scoff.

By saying it's appropriate for the board (your original contention), I have to assume that you mean the board should take it to heart. The people here aren't trying to find the truth by engaging in meaningful back-and-forth, nor are they trying to cultivate brotherhood in this thread. We aren't debating in the collegiate sense. We do not seek any common understanding.

We are here to employ standard rhetoric. We are two rival groups of chimps throwing sticks and dung at each other.

The people here understand that we have an impasse of polarization and we know that our beliefs are far different than those other beliefs. We are here to throw stones because that's the only way to deal with the insanity presented by the other side.

If you just mean that it applies to the board, it's insulting because it's the kind of drivel you feed to fifth graders in a civics class.

^Arguing to win word-count

 

[tarheel0910]

I apologize. I know you're actually right to say that what is being said applies to this board. It wasn't that you presented it, it's the content that made me scoff.

By saying it's appropriate for the board (your original contention), I have to assume that you mean the board should take it to heart. The people here aren't trying to find the truth by engaging in meaningful back-and-forth, nor are they trying to cultivate brotherhood in this thread. We aren't debating in the collegiate sense. We do not seek any common understanding.

We are here to employ standard rhetoric. We are two rival groups of chimps throwing sticks and dung at each other.

The people here understand that we have an impasse of polarization and we know that our beliefs are far different than those other beliefs. We are here to throw stones because that's the only way to deal with the insanity presented by the other side.

If you just mean that it applies to the board, it's insulting because it's the kind of drivel you feed to fifth graders in a civics class.

tl;dr

 

[bluetoe]

tl;dr

tl:dr

 

[bluetoe]

new discussion; what can be done to help the left with their literacy problem? Entire paragraphs seem to overwhelm them.

 

[bluetoe]

Go to some of the more popular Rival’s forums, they’ll explain.

I would if I was that interested.

 

[prlyles]

I would if I was that interested.

If I was interested I would have explained to you, or at least tried.

 

[randman1]

Somehow people actually still dismiss the New World Order as a mere conspiracy.

Davos Attendee: Agenda is to Create a “New World Order”

Says hyper-partisan world is hindering progress.

summit.news

 

[randman1]

Wait, there's more....

More Documents With Classified Markings Found at Biden's Delaware Home

A search by Department of Justice authorities has yielded six more documents with classified markings at President Joe ...

www.theepochtimes.com

 

[bluetoe]

If I was interested I would have explained to you, or at least tried.

you were interested enough to post it in the first place, genius.

 

[uncboy10]

tl;dr

You're such an illiterate leftie

 

[bluetoe]

You're such an illiterate leftie

he's a lefty?

 

[tarheel0910]

You're such an illiterate leftie

I didn't know that, but I always enjoy learning new things.

 

[uncboy10]

I didn't know that, but I always enjoy learning new things.

It must hard to learn new things when you're so easily overwhelmed by paragraphs.

 

[bluetoe]

It must hard to learn new things when you're so easily overwhelmed by paragraphs.

^^^^^^^ case in point

 

[heelmanwilm]

Somehow people actually still dismiss the New World Order as a mere conspiracy.

Davos Attendee: Agenda is to Create a “New World Order”

Says hyper-partisan world is hindering progress.

summit.news

 

[uncboy10]

^^^^^^^ case in point

 

[tarheel0910]

I want to thank @heelmanwilm and @uncboy10 for their gif usage. It's making things so much easier for me.

 

[heelmanwilm]

I want to thank @heelmanwilm and @uncboy10 for their gif usage. It's making things so much easier for me.

 

[uncboy10]

I want to thank @heelmanwilm and @uncboy10 for their gif usage. It's making things so much easier for me.

 

[bluetoe]

^^^^^^^ case in point confirmed

 

[tarheel0910]

Great episode

 

[strummingram]

Great episode

The rifle in the tail shooting bullets through the horns!!!

 

[Heels Noir]

Poor bluetoe.
Taps

 

[bluetoe]

Poor bluetoe.
Taps

help for Heels Noir.

 

[Heels Noir]

Blah, blah, blah, %&*#@!! . . .

988 offers 24/7 access to trained crisis counselors who can help people experiencing mental health-related distress. That could be:

• Thoughts of suicide
• Mental health or substance use crisis, or
• Any other kind of emotional distress

Help is available, bluetoe

 

[nctransplant]

988 offers 24/7 access to trained crisis counselors who can help people experiencing mental health-related distress. That could be:

• Thoughts of suicide
• Mental health or substance use crisis, or
• Any other kind of emotional distress

Help is available

Glad they were able to help you.

 

[gunslingerdick]

That's where the poor leadership comes into play. He wasn't fooling anybody with that excuse except for gullible suckers like you,

You're the one that walked around with a purposeless mask for a couple years and willingly got jabbed several times (with more on the way) with an unproven vaccine and we're the gullible suckers? Lol. The jokes write themselves.

 

[gunslingerdick]

This article feels very appropriate for the board.

Yale research: Highly successful people argue differently

People "arguing to win" took a hard line and only saw one right answer, Yale research from 2016 found. There's a better way to debate, says researcher Matthew Fisher.

www.cnbc.com

That would assume that there's anyone here I feel is worth learning from.

 

[gunslingerdick]

988 offers 24/7 access to trained crisis counselors who can help people experiencing mental health-related distress. That could be:

• Thoughts of suicide
• Mental health or substance use crisis, or
• Any other kind of emotional distress

Help is available, bluetoe

Did you mean to tag @carolinablue34 ?

 

[bluetoe]

988 offers 24/7 access to trained crisis counselors who can help people experiencing mental health-related distress. That could be:

• Thoughts of suicide
• Mental health or substance use crisis, or
• Any other kind of emotional distress

Help is available, bluetoe

they apparently aren't too good at fixing the butthurt/obsession kind of emotional distress. Seriously, get your money back and try the butthurt cream. You've become an embarrassment to the board with all your unfunny little bitchbites.

In a way I wish I could take back all those things I said that make you obsessed with me. On the other hand, it's actually kind of nice residing in someone's head.