OOTB's Political Thread . ..
- Thread starter BillyL
- Start date
I’ll be honest, I’m not really all that familiar with the allegations against Biden. But assuming they are true, then it will be very interesting. If there’s actually video of him doing it then there’s no way he gets the nomination IMO.
I agree with that assessment, but don't think that's how it should be. If he's the best guy for the job, he should get the nomination. We need the best President, not the best beacon of morality, to win the Presidency.
Not a picture of Biden with little girls, though I know there are plenty to creep anyone out.
This is a favorite pic of Biden for me: the look on these two biker dudes faces, classic: "Catch me out back, Joe"
This is a favorite pic of Biden for me: the look on these two biker dudes faces, classic: "Catch me out back, Joe"
No, if I was saying that, my poast would have read "a candidate should get the nomination regardless of whether they are a known sex offender against children or not"
How far do you take that though? What if he or trump had violently raped someone? Does it still matter if they’re the best man for the job? Obviously this is different than groping but it raises the question of where to draw the line.
Much of the president’s job is serving as a kind of figure head type leader of the country. In many ways the POTUS is a beacon of morality to the public and the world. It’s not the whole gig, but it’s part of it.
Last edited:
Nobody is giving credibility to AOC. Her own party openly mocks her. She's an outlier and the only reason to pay attention to her is for laughs. The dumb youth that you talk about doesn't vote, so they aren't an issue.
Ya, if a crime was committed, especially rape, then that would take them out of the running in my mind.
Actions such as that would remove the person from being "the best person for the job" in my mind. Commentary and/or perceived morals don't do that though, IMO.
@Hark_The_Sound_2010
You didn't provide the context. If you provided the context, then it's easy to see why @Terror Beard would think you were talking about sexually harassing kids.
You didn't provide the context. If you provided the context, then it's easy to see why @Terror Beard would think you were talking about sexually harassing kids.
Bernie Sanders and Ron Paul were considered that. All it did was get them reelected to congress and I would guess the youth weren't the ones who voted for them
Ya, I considered any question asking if I condoned diddling kids to be not worthy of a legitimate response.
From everything I've seen and read, Bernie and Ron's supporters skew to the younger voters. And 20 year olds won't vote no matter what.
Ya, that's in the direction I was thinking. But there can proof someone is a scumbag, in the sense of they were caught on video saying something uncouth, but that wouldn't necessarily indicate to me they weren't the best person for the job. Now, if an action had been committed, that would indicate that to me.
Whatever helps you sleep at night. The difference is yours is an opinion. I can back mine up with stats. I've noticed that people like you don't care about facts, so I didn't actually include links to save you from embarrassment. You can thank me later for that.
If I thought showing you the links would cause you to admit you were wrong, I would do it. You're not the type to believe actual evidence that shows you're wrong, so it would be a waste of my time. I don't feel like wasting my time.
They're teenagers. I'm talking about girls who are about 8 or 9, and I'm talking about actual groping them, not some alleged instance where he walked into a teenage dressing room. Neither are good, but those actual groping instances are on a whole other level.
Why don't you post a link to all this and let people make up their own mind?
Here's an article showing how Bernie supporters are young.
https://www.vox.com/2019/3/7/18216899/bernie-sanders-bro-base-polling-2020-president
Here's an article showing how Paul supporters are young.
https://grist.org/election-2012/why-ron-paul-elderly-libertarian-crank-turns-young-voters-on/
Here's an article showing that young people suck at voting.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/11/youth-turnout-midterm-2018/575092/
https://www.vox.com/2019/3/7/18216899/bernie-sanders-bro-base-polling-2020-president
Here's an article showing how Paul supporters are young.
https://grist.org/election-2012/why-ron-paul-elderly-libertarian-crank-turns-young-voters-on/
Here's an article showing that young people suck at voting.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/11/youth-turnout-midterm-2018/575092/
Clinton was accused of rape and people loved him. Especially the left. That should answer the morality question between groping and rape.
Nah, all those Dems love to manhandle little girls, some little boys too...
Remember Barney Frank?
Big shock that you're giving The Groper a pass. That is some creepy stuff. I would never let a grown man put his hands on my daughter like that.
Edit: I think this is the video where some of the girls are actually recoiling at his touch and are trying to get away from him. If that's funny to you, then you're a sick puppy, bruh.
I wanted to be sure that THAT was what you were referencing before I went further. But, since it wasn't... never mind.
Was he? I obviously remember all the women but I don’t remember one of them saying it wasn’t consensual. Those ugly women loved them some slick Willy.
