ADVERTISEMENT

OOTB's Political Thread . ..

pooponduke said:
I think he's just lazy about it. He's probably a "skimmer". In fact, if he were a bus boy, he'd hurry over to a table to take the waitress' tip.
Click to expand...
I'm not a skimmer and my reading comprehension is fine. I was simply making an observation about how outraged the Trumpies have been today all because Kamala Harris put in a request for some rule changes. I don't see the big deal in that, probably because at this point it's not a big deal. Work it out, candidates, and move on, yeah?

But you guys continually play the Trump-as-the-victim card. You know, how the Democrats cheated during the last election, or how the Democrats cheated by pushing out Biden and bringing in a stronger candidate, or how the Democrats are cheating by trying to redefine the rules for debates . . .

Bunch of crybabies.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: Archer2, blazers and nctransplant
strummingram said:
Stop using the line? Well, if it's overturned, then yeah. But, it hasn't been overturned and I go back to my original comment:


You gotta marvel at American political theater. One candidate got kicked off the ticket by his party. The other one is awaiting a sentencing in a felony conviction.

And, the two that are finally still running are nit-picking a debate that's just going to be more theater.
Click to expand...
One is nit-picking, the other is trying to change the rules.
 
nctransplant said:
You must be a lazy reader as well.

No comment on the judges charges of no unanimous votes on any single charge?
Click to expand...
Are you trying to get a kiss from me?

kiss.gif
 
Heels Noir said:
I'm not a skimmer and my reading comprehension is fine. I was simply making an observation about how outraged the Trumpies have been today all because Kamala Harris put in a request for some rule changes. I don't see the big deal in that, probably because at this point it's not a big deal. Work it out, candidates, and move on, yeah?

But you guys continually play the Trump-as-the-victim card. You know, how the Democrats cheated during the last election, or how the Democrats cheated by pushing out Biden and bringing in a stronger candidate, or how the Democrats are cheating by trying to redefine the rules for debates . . .

Bunch of crybabies.
Click to expand...
We don't have the benefit of all that JOY right now. Maybe Trump will add JOY to his policies.
 
strummingram said:
Stop using the line? Well, if it's overturned, then yeah. But, it hasn't been overturned and I go back to my original comment:


You gotta marvel at American political theater. One candidate got kicked off the ticket by his party. The other one is awaiting a sentencing in a felony conviction.

And, the two that are finally still running are nit-picking a debate that's just going to be more theater.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I get you’re impressed with the political theatre. I’m not as impressed.

But I just wanted to be sure you’ll retract your repeated statements of him being a felon and yada, yada, yada. I just wanted to make sure you’re not going to say that it was some Trump appointed stooge that overturned it or some other nonsense. I’ll be paying attention and quick to remind you once the appeal happens.
 
strummingram said:
Sooo... he has not been found guilty of 34 counts and awaiting sentencing?
Click to expand...
There are two phases to a criminal trial. The first is culpability and the second is sentencing. Then, those verdicts and sentences become final only after the running of the appeal period or when one exhausts their possible appeals. In this instance, he's not even finished his initial trial. What I'm telling you is that this "conviction" or finding of guilt WILL be overturned on appeal due to several reversible errors. They are not the kind of errors that are insignificant that had no impact on the jury and would be ignored on appeal. So, you and everyone else in that camp can crow all you want - for now. But, I notice you didn't take me up on my suggestion and you don't seem to be so certain about what's going to happen on appeal.

There are reasons for appeal courts and Merchon is a classic example. Whether it's pure hatred, blind obedience, or partisanship (he can't be that stupid, he just can't), he ran a very poor trial. It will be overturned. Just remember this exchange one day down the road and don't act like this discussion never happened. As to the net impact on the election, who the heck knows.
 
  • Love
Reactions: nctransplant
strummingram said:
You never asked a question. You're busy riding the coat-tails of 3 other people I'm trying to actually have an exchange with... you've never been addressed at all.
Click to expand...
nctransplant said:
You must be a lazy reader as well.

No comment on the judges charges of no unanimous votes on any single charge?
Click to expand...
The sentence with a question mark is called a question.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Archer2
I have to agree with the MAGA's on this one. You agreed to the same terms as the first one and you should honor your word.
 
pooponduke said:
There are two phases to a criminal trial. The first is culpability and the second is sentencing. Then, those verdicts and sentences become final only after the running of the appeal period or when one exhausts their possible appeals. In this instance, he's not even finished his initial trial. What I'm telling you is that this "conviction" or finding of guilt WILL be overturned on appeal due to several reversible errors. They are not the kind of errors that are insignificant that had no impact on the jury and would be ignored on appeal. So, you and everyone else in that camp can crow all you want - for now. But, I notice you didn't take me up on my suggestion and you don't seem to be so certain about what's going to happen on appeal.

There are reasons for appeal courts and Merchon is a classic example. Whether it's pure hatred, blind obedience, or partisanship (he can't be that stupid, he just can't), he ran a very poor trial. It will be overturned. Just remember this exchange one day down the road and don't act like this discussion never happened. As to the net impact on the election, who the heck knows.
Click to expand...
So he was found guilty? It's just a yes or no. I know you don't like it, I know it's a real bite in the ass that the candidate you're backing is a convicted felon, but that is the case. And the other one got kicked off of his party's ticket because he was too demented.
 
pooponduke said:
Finally. That's the first step. You'll get there if you work real hard. You're welcome.
Click to expand...
That's real flattering coming from you, the board's #2 dumbass. At least I'm giving you credit for only being #2 behind the board's #1 dumbass, @nctransplant. If the two of you ever teamed up to reinvent the wheel I'm sure it would look something like this:
giphy.gif
 
Heels Noir said:
That's real flattering coming from you, the board's #2 dumbass. At least I'm giving you credit for only being #2 behind the board's #1 dumbass, @nctransplant. If the two of you ever teamed up to reinvent the wheel I'm sure it would look something like this:
giphy.gif
Click to expand...
Wait a minute. You can't leave out poopslinger and blueballs.
 
Heels Noir said:
I'm not a skimmer and my reading comprehension is fine. I was simply making an observation about how outraged the Trumpies have been today all because Kamala Harris put in a request for some rule changes. I don't see the big deal in that, probably because at this point it's not a big deal. Work it out, candidates, and move on, yeah?

But you guys continually play the Trump-as-the-victim card. You know, how the Democrats cheated during the last election, or how the Democrats cheated by pushing out Biden and bringing in a stronger candidate, or how the Democrats are cheating by trying to redefine the rules for debates . . .

Bunch of crybabies.
Click to expand...

Why do you keep saying the candidates need to work it out? There is no need to work anything out. Both candidates need to adhere to the original terms.
 
gunslingerdick said:
Why do you keep saying the candidates need to work it out? There is no need to work anything out. Both candidates need to adhere to the original terms.
Click to expand...
That's fine, whatever. All I'm saying is that certain members here are getting their panties in a wad perhaps prematurely.
 
It was just a power play that didn’t work. She yanked his chain to make it look like she’s in control. To his credit to go against his campaign and say he wants open mics now or doesn’t care is the right response. It pretty much defuses the whole thing.
 
know what drives me crazy? movies, and TV shows never depict actors properly using a shovel if they have to dig in a scene. Those of us that have ever had to dig a hole know you have to press down on the top of the blade with your foot. Yet, they never do that in shows or movies, they hack at the ground just holding on to the handle. Yet a few minutes later, presto a hole big enough to bury a body, dug in the woods through roots and rocks.

Carry on
 
heelmanwilm said:
know what drives me crazy? movies, and TV shows never depict actors properly using a shovel if they have to dig in a scene. Those of us that have ever had to dig a hole know you have to press down on the top of the blade with your foot. Yet, they never do that in shows or movies, they hack at the ground just holding on to the handle. Yet a few minutes later, presto a hole big enough to bury a body, dug in the woods through roots and rocks.

Carry on
Click to expand...
8ldq.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: heelmanwilm
nctransplant said:
Pete Bootyjuice couldn't even manage the mayoral job of a city. He is another DEI hire.
Click to expand...
Amen.
Heels Noir said:
When I first read this board around midmorning and noticed the Trump campers and their hair on fire, I thought maybe Kamala was demanding the debate be done underwater and in Swahili.
Click to expand...
Reported.


/s
nctransplant said:
He is lazy. He NEVER answers questions. I guess all Dims are the same.
Click to expand...
Dim and Dimmer. There may be a movie there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nctransplant
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: nctransplant and Archer2
nctransplant said:
www.foxbusiness.com

Meta CEO admits Biden-Harris admin pressured company to censor Americans

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg admitted in a letter to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan that the Biden-Harris admin pressured Facebook to censor Americans.
www.foxbusiness.com www.foxbusiness.com

DeMoCrAcY my ass. You libs really are becoming the communist party of the USA.
Click to expand...

No funny business with the 2020 election at all. That's conspiracy theory shit.

Maybe this year, it's Elon's turn to help the candidate he likes. Uh oh...
 
  • Love
Reactions: nctransplant
nctransplant said:
www.foxbusiness.com

Meta CEO admits Biden-Harris admin pressured company to censor Americans

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg admitted in a letter to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan that the Biden-Harris admin pressured Facebook to censor Americans.
www.foxbusiness.com www.foxbusiness.com

DeMoCrAcY my ass. You libs really are becoming the communist party of the USA.
Click to expand...
Hark_The_Sound_2010 said:
The party of censorship.
Click to expand...
gunslingerdick said:
No funny business with the 2020 election at all. That's conspiracy theory shit.

Maybe this year, it's Elon's turn to help the candidate he likes. Uh oh...
Click to expand...
And how much time has passed on all this? But Orange is the threat?
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Archer2 and nctransplant
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Archer2 and nctransplant
The D convention was used as cover for the jobs revision were just short of a million jobs that have previously been claimed just went poof into thin air. There was also this little revision to the "stats" that no one notice because the networks were too busy to address because they were gushing over the joy and hope.

 
  • Angry
Reactions: Archer2 and nctransplant
It's also come out, but gone unnoticed regarding the Kamala proposals. Of the few things she's actually talked about, price gauging (her words, not mine) and the assistance to first time home buyers. Her price controls got widely panned by almost everyone, but no one seemed to notice the little detail on the housing.

Without even going into the crazy impact of providing first time home buyers with a "free" 25K, there is the issue of what she really is talking about. Apparently, it's being reported over and over and we all just assumed that what she meant was 25K for first time home buyers. However, what she is really proposing is 25K for first generation homebuyers. Let that distinction sink in for a moment and why it is significant. Noir, we'll allow you extra time.

It means that my kid isn't eligible for assistance in buying her first home because I own mine. It would mean anyone who's parents, grandparents, great grandparents, and onward who ever owned a home would not be eligible. Guess who are first generation homebuyers???????
 
  • Angry
Reactions: nctransplant
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

strummingram

added to misc thread

Replies
1
Views
268
Four Corners
strummingram
strummingram
andrew jones

Signing Day Thread

Replies
26
Views
1K
Blue Heaven
BCox83
BCox83
RobJones__

Misc. College Basketball Thread

Replies
163
Views
9K
Four Corners
tarwhiz
T
andrew jones
  • Sticky

NET rankings thread (Week of Feb. 17)

Replies
122
Views
9K
Four Corners
benjadod
B
IDUNK4HEELS

Carolina vs Alabama game thread

Replies
212
Views
6K
Tar Heel Radar
notashelbyfan
notashelbyfan
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back