He used a foreign government (or tried to) to gain dirt on an opponent how is that not wrong or illegal?
OOTB's Political Thread . ..
- Thread starter BillyL
- Start date
He used a foreign government (or tried to) to gain dirt on an opponent how is that not wrong or illegal?
You are certainly welcome. Your response proves the delusional hatred part. It is too bad you hate the man, that's on you and your ilk. You put forth radical left wing ideas and candidates backed up with your beloved Saul Alinsky rules for radicals and expect people on the right to passively accept those concepts. You and your minions put on masks and attack people when you have the majority with your antifa crowd and expect me not to interpret your hurt feelings as a joke? Some of us see through your controlled media, how you turn blacks against whites, male against female, straights against gays. Your party, the democratic party will get what you are seeking, you just are going to have to be patient and wait another 20 years or so. Most of you are seeing the reality of four more years of Trump and are beside of yourself with anger and resentment that your endgame of socialism will have to wait a little longer, and you were sooooo close...partisan bullshit politics yes that is exactly where we are today and you have created your own prison with: not my president, russia investigation, stormy daniels and now ukraine phone calls. The nation is divided because it is the Saul Alinsky way.
@heelmanwilm is pretty much down the middle, so you just wasted a lot of time typing out a bunch of nonsense. Also, paragraphs are your friend.
Because you can fit 8 people in a van and drive them to a polling place since they’re all voting on the same day.
Well that’s about the stupidest thing I’ve heard today. Treating politics like a zero sum game is exactly how we ended up in our current predicament.
Ok. I misunderstood what you were saying. I was just talking about one individual, not a group.
I refer you to post 9,725 in this thread.
Do you know who you're talking to?
And, secondly; Do you actually use the word "ilk" in normal, real-life conversation, or are you just cashing-in on it here? It always sounds sounds pretentious... unless you're mimicking C. Montgomery Burns.
Dick, I’m laughing my ass off right now. I’m just breaking your balls haha
I can think of worse things to do honestly. Now if you had said “with a rusty spatula” that’s how he’ll know you mean business.
You know grandpa’s mad when he’s still poasting after 8 pm.
So, you're comparing the act of asking another president about why a prosecutor was removed from a case to the same as paying someone, with campaign funds, for something like...the Steele Report?
No he isn't. And as Example A, I introduce the people who liked your post. None of those people are "down the middle".
You know, it's pretty ironic that your avatar is Bender, but your belief system is so...Anabaptist.
Look it up, since I'm pretty sure you have no idea what that means.
I did, with great vigor, and I used your tears as a lube. I hope that doesn’t make things awkward between us.
I'm going to need something other than you just saying I'm wrong.
Actually you made the claim I was wrong first, therefore the onus is on you to prove me wrong.
C'mon, dude. You made the claim that he was down the middle. I told you that you were wrong. Now you want me to explain why you're wrong without having to explain why you're right? Seriously?
I'm a classical liberal though, not this modern day college campus left wing crap that comes from Ivy League universities haha.
Yes. You were the first to make a counterclaim. The first one to make a counterclaim is the one responsible to provide proof. Sorry, that's just how things work.
That might be the funniest thing I've ever read on here. How are you a "classical liberal"?
Counter claim? I'm asking you for proof of the original claim, which is completely obvious to anyone with half a brain...that you don't have. You were caught, brah. You aren't stupid. Admit it and fight another battle.
No. Your first post said I was wrong. That means it's your responsibility to provide proof that I'm wrong. Sorry that you've lost this battle.
So, you make some accusation, and I tell you that you're wrong, then the onus is on my to tell you why I'm wrong? I mean...I could probably do this, but I'm enjoying watching you squirm.
Tell us why he's down the middle, or wait till he logs on to tell us why he's down the middle. I'm just not going to waste my information without lulling you into my trap. You should have realize my MO by this point in time. I feast on ill-advised comments.
I believe in capitalism as the driving force behind economic growth and stability, while realizing that vulture capitalism and irresponsible banking need to be prevented.
I believe in the concept of free press, free speech, and freedom of religion, while also recognizing that the latter is best not taught in schools or in mainstream public education. I do not believe that 'hate speech' is a crime or that people should be fired for a tweet they posted 5 years ago.
I believe in the institutions of American government, knowing that each branch of government serves to prevent the other from becoming too powerful, especially the executive.
Above all, I believe in the rights of others to live as they choose and please as long as it doesn't hurt another person. I believe that the United States is exceptional and should be an example for the rest of the world.
That sounds like you copy/pasted it off a website.
First question: How do you feel about Trump withdrawing troops from Syria?
Trust me, there will be more of these questions forthcoming.
I didn't make any accusation. I made the comment that he was down the middle. You made the accusation, without proof, that I was wrong. I honestly didn't set out to Van Damn you, so I apologise for doing that and for hurting your feelings. Hopefully you can admit you were wrong and spare yourself from further embarrassment.
Similar threads
