https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/10/turkey-and-the-kurds-its-more-complicated-than-you-think/
I thought this article was quite well -esearched and well- written, regarding the facts and history of the Kurds in the Syria / Turkey / Iraq / Iran region.
I
don't for a second give credit to DJT for 5% of this writer's level of assessment or consideration or thought - in deciding to pull out some of the troops. The point is: it's not as black and white as most make it out to be. But few voters / readers seem to have the attention span or interest to learn the details. (I'm
not referring here to anyone on this board).
But the article does describe how "our Kurdish allies" aren't all noble and altruistic with noble goals, and that we do have some legal obligation to Turkey.....
….but most of all, we should be way more hesitant and thoughtful and - I don't know - maybe go through congress like the Constitution requires? when intervening in these foreign conflicts - so we could determine what the US goal is, what the US plan is, how exactly does our involvement/intervention further US interests, and how do we know the mission is accomplished, so we don't have to have US troops stationed there forever, with no stated end goal in sight, no way of the conflict ever ending.
Note: there were over 2,000 troops in Syria last year. There are 1,000 today. DJT's proposed removal of around 100 in the Kurd / Turk conflict will bring the number stationed there still - to about 900 US soldiers (family members of US citizens).
Is it a bad move to abandon people who have fought with us against ISIS in that region? No question - I don't dispute that for a minute. Leaving the Kurds twisting in the wind, is very bad. But how did we not see this coming, when we first got involved, unless we were implicitly signing up to be in the region forever?