Whoa, when did you people start requiring something to be true? Trump must not have gotten the memo.you do, but you pointing something out only makes it likely to be untrue.
Whoa, when did you people start requiring something to be true? Trump must not have gotten the memo.you do, but you pointing something out only makes it likely to be untrue.
That noise you hear is another nail being driven into the MAGA coffin after the opening night of the DNC.
I'll be sure to let Pennsylvanians know.You and headlines. I promise, there’s a story in there. Check it out!
![]()
aaaand.... PA has been called for Harris
Apparently he was trying to make fun of some other politician, but that headline puts the joke on him.
Sound Up.I will say the crowd seemed more enthusiastic than for the rnc’s
Wrong party, wrong convention.
Is that the one where he's praising Putin, Erdogan, Kim Jong Un, and Victor Orban?
Remember all those promises about Biden's corruption and how he was going to be impeached? Repubs have finally given up... no impeachment recommended. Cuz it was bluster. Expensive, performative bluster.
where in my post does it suggest that I require anything? It is what it is. When I see a lie I just point it out and when I see the truth I point that out as well.Whoa, when did you people start requiring something to be true? Trump must not have gotten the memo.
And I'm betting that $27,000,000 he and Hunter made for doing nothing won't go in his casket.And he's going to literally die any day now so at this point, who cares?
Liar.When I see a lie I just point it out and when I see the truth I point that out as well.
And I'm betting that $27,000,000 he and Hunter made for doing nothing won't go in his casket.
Too many classified docs in it for that.Oh no! What about his Corvette? Can they get that in there?
My God. Sometimes you have to see it to believe it. You have balls to say 'it was bluster. Expensive, performative bluster.' after the two political showboat wastes of their time and our money that the dems put on against Trump. It was a matter of practicality that the Biden impeachment went nowhere. Biden is ten times more impeachable than Trump ever was. I can prove that with ten million illegals, just for starters..Remember all those promises about Biden's corruption and how he was going to be impeached? Repubs have finally given up... no impeachment recommended. Cuz it was bluster. Expensive, performative bluster.
This line of attack is weird to me. Do you guys know what the VP role is?On Kameltoe's 1305th day she is going to do something about prices...
I'm trying to give her a little credit. It's pretty obvious that no one is home in Joe's head. You like her price control proposals and raising taxes?This line of attack is weird to me. Do you guys know what the VP role is?
evidently it's to support and praise what the president does and then when it's expedient to do so, imply that he didn't do anything right and then lie about how it's all going to change, even though her clearly stated philosophy has been exactly opposite of what she now claims. That about right?This line of attack is weird to me. Do you guys know what the VP role is?
That's pretty accurate historically speaking. I know Pence, Gore and Biden were the same. I would assume it goes back farther than that.evidently it's to support and praise what the president does and then when it's expedient to do so, imply that he didn't do anything right and then lie about how it's all going to change, even though her clearly stated philosophy has been exactly opposite of what she now claims. That about right?
yeah, who cares about corruption, draining swamps, accountability, all that.And he's going to literally die any day now so at this point, who cares?
I haven't read her proposals, so I can't really say much about them.I'm trying to give her a little credit. It's pretty obvious that no one is home in Joe's head. You like her price control proposals and raising taxes?
I would agree with you on this probably 43, 44 times out of 46, but context always matters.This line of attack is weird to me. Do you guys know what the VP role is?
I gave you two above. Price controls and raising taxes.I haven't read her proposals, so I can't really say much about them.
Quiet, the adults are talking.Neither has he.
You act like he's been exonerated and that this was all a big hoax that the system portrayed against him. Seems you're living in opposite world or something. You'll probably even will tell us that Joe wasn't charged for the secret document stuff because he didn't actually do anything wrong there either.yeah, who cares about corruption, draining swamps, accountability, all that.
Of course you do. lol I am amazed at how little self-awareness you people have. Did you really type that with a straight face?When I see a lie I just point it out and when I see the truth I point that out as well.
How would you? I mean, besides things like promoting good over evil, wanting economic prosperity versus poverty, peace versus war, etc.I haven't read her proposals, so I can't really say much about them.
Sorry but the track record of the past is 4 year, is far better than than TrumpsAnd before one of the parrots simply cries out, "but what about . . . .", let's remember, they've both had four years of policy track records that are pretty good indicators of their "proposals".
"The reporting" - lolWhat are thousands more dead women, children, fathers, etc. if it means he has a better chance of repairing his narcissistic ego by winning the election..
Oh, so you are a fan of sending a shit ton of money to countries to fight wars that weren't going on during the previous 4 years. You're also a fan of high inflation and paying double for gas. Makes perfect sense, if you're an idiot.Sorry but the track record of the past is 4 year, is far better than than Trumps
I'm perfectly fine with no ceasefire. Let Israel go ahead and do their thing so we don't have to worry about it. Sure they could stop now, but we all know it's just going to start up again next year because that's what happens every time. Let Israel hit them when they are weak.What are thousands more dead women, children, fathers, etc. if it means he has a better chance of repairing his narcissistic ego by winning the election..
How does any of that give her the power of the president? The only time a VP has any real power is when they are the tiebreaker in a Senate vote. Otherwise they are just there in case the president dies.I would agree with you on this probably 43, 44 times out of 46, but context always matters.
She's the one who proclaimed that Joe was a raging ball of fire in their private meetings conducting the people's work.
She's the one who insisted that she was the last one in the room when Joe was making his big decisions.
Doesn't she have to own that now?
She was the tie-breaker in what was one of the worst things to happen just after they took office. The Inflation Multiplier ActHow does any of that give her the power of the president? The only time a VP has any real power is when they are the tiebreaker in a Senate vote. Otherwise they are just there in case the president dies.
Sorry, but I'm not going to trust a person who is completely against her to sum up her policies. Best to read them myself.I gave you two above. Price controls and raising taxes.
Right, so attack her on that. Saying she should have done things she has no power to do is just dumb.She was the tie-breaker in what was one of the worst things to happen just after they took office.