ADVERTISEMENT

Orlando Night Club Shooting

Tell ya what...

Imagine if the roles are reversed for a moment. Imagine the United States was taken over 60 years ago by another country. Ever since then we've been oppressed, we've been subjected to poverty and death, we've been fought over we've been disheveled, we've been bombed, we've been subjected to one harsh regime after another. And we believe that the source of the endless misery is Blank Country. We're going to pissed at them. Rightfully so. Finally some of us start fighting back in groups, small groups, terrorist cells funded by others of us that have some money and the ability to acquire weapons. And it builds and builds and builds and builds. Our lives and culture and Society has been a war zone for nearly three-quarters of a century. And, mostly for the valuable resources in the ground under us. How do you think we would feel, how do you think we would respond, and how do you think we would look going forward?

Imagine if history went farther back than 60 years. Imagine that other problems existed before the ones you mentioned. If you do that you will finally realize that the problem is the person that commits the crime. Continuing to place blame on other things is a waste of time and energy. And yes, what you are doing is placing blame.
 
It's not really about blame. It's about recognizing what is not working and changing course.

Keep fighting these people. They live for it. I can guarantee you this; americans have nowhere near the same resolve.
Which is it? You can't have it both ways....either they "live for it" or they would be peaceful if would stop messing with them. It can't be both.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gunslingerdick
China? Russia? No clue what you're going on about. What do you think will happen if we 100% leave the Middle East and have zero presence there, including Israel?
I was being facetious. It was making fun of your Armageddon scenario if American troops and occupation is gone.

It's not going to happen because too much money and resource, and power over it, is at stake.

But, it will continue to motivate people who want revenge and retribution. So, expect more.
 
Tell ya what...

Imagine if the roles are reversed for a moment. Imagine the United States was taken over 60 years ago by another country. Ever since then we've been oppressed, we've been subjected to poverty and death, we've been fought over we've been disheveled, we've been bombed, we've been subjected to one harsh regime after another. And we believe that the source of the endless misery is Blank Country. We're going to pissed at them. Rightfully so. Finally some of us start fighting back in groups, small groups, terrorist cells funded by others of us that have some money and the ability to acquire weapons. And it builds and builds and builds and builds. Our lives and culture and Society has been a war zone for nearly three-quarters of a century. And, mostly for the valuable resources in the ground under us. How do you think we would feel, how do you think we would respond, and how do you think we would look going forward?

Strum, my money is on they won't answer that one. They cannot even imagine it because they're too busy pounding their chests!! We are wasting our time trying to illustrate what doing things different might bring. They don't want peace because they see peaceful as weak, when in fact, it's the opposite. Fighters are weak... Weak minded, weak spirited. You can't change their minds and you certainly can't get them to at the very least open them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: strummingram
Which is it? You can't have it both ways....either they "live for it" or they would be peaceful if would stop messing with them. It can't be both.
They will gladly fight you if you show up and fvck with them. They'll fight like the Viet Cong. It's their home.
 
Strum, my money is on they won't answer that one. They cannot even imagine it because they're too busy pounding their chests!! We are wasting our time trying to illustrate what doing things different might bring. They don't want peace because they see peaceful as weak, when in fact, it's the opposite. Fighters are weak... Weak minded, weak spirited. You can't change their minds and you certainly can't get them to at the very least open them.
You'll find that 99% here have no interest in empathy. They want revenge. And the cycle will go on and on.

Most of them are just living room jingoists.
 
Radical Islamic hatred of the us stems from our support of israel. So long as that remains these attacks will continue.

It takes extreme emotions to radicalize someone, no matter what their religion/philosophy. Every time we carry out indiscriminate drone strikes, we kill innocent women and children. Those women and children have brothers, sisters, fathers, mothers, sons, uncles, ect. And they end up fighting for ISIS because they want revenge. It's an endless feedback loop, and that's exactly the way the private defense industry wants it.

To spray bullets everywhere if you are a bad shot?

An AR-15 is a semi-automatic rifle. You could "spray" just as many rounds from a 9mm handgun in the same amount of time, and they would do a lot more damage.
 
Every time we carry out indiscriminate drone strikes, we kill innocent women and children. Those women and children have brothers, sisters, fathers, mothers, sons, uncles, ect. And they end up fighting for ISIS because they want revenge. It's an endless feedback loop, and that's exactly the way the private defense industry wants it.
Pure Gold!
 
Imagine if history went farther back than 60 years. Imagine that other problems existed before the ones you mentioned. If you do that you will finally realize that the problem is the person that commits the crime. Continuing to place blame on other things is a waste of time and energy. And yes, what you are doing is placing blame.
Who the fvck are you talking about??? Who gets the blame for you?

Iraq wasn't even a country in 1803. It was a country after WWI, 1932 even. The carving-up of the Middle East in the 20th Century has been a MAJOR variable in this whole thing.
 
Strum, my money is on they won't answer that one. They cannot even imagine it because they're too busy pounding their chests!! We are wasting our time trying to illustrate what doing things different might bring. They don't want peace because they see peaceful as weak, when in fact, it's the opposite. Fighters are weak... Weak minded, weak spirited. You can't change their minds and you certainly can't get them to at the very least open them.
Had our policy been what you and strum want it to be these people would still exist. If you guys want to continue to ignore reality and pretend that we are to blame that's fine, you certainly have that right.
 
Had our policy been what you and strum want it to be these people would still exist. If you guys want to continue to ignore reality and pretend that we are to blame that's fine, you certainly have that right.
WHO would still exist??? Who in the hell are you talking about?
 
Who the fvck are you talking about??? Who gets the blame for you?

Iraq wasn't even a country in 1803. It was a country after WWI, 1932 even. The carving-up of the Middle East in the 20th Century has been a MAJOR variable in this whole thing.
My point was that you keep talking about a time period that doesn't make sense. These types of problems and other problems have existed since the beginning of time. The individual is the cause. Responsibility shouldn't fall on another person's shoulders. By the way, not once have I advocated for war in this thread.
 
My point was that you keep talking about a time period that doesn't make sense. These types of problems and other problems have existed since the beginning of time. The individual is the cause. Responsibility shouldn't fall on another person's shoulders. By the way, not once have I advocated for war in this thread.
The guy that shot-up the club? yes, that is on HIS shoulders. That was his choice. I thought we were discussing the motivation, what it stems from, and the likelihood of others to act-out in the same way. I'm not blaming these individual acts directly on American foreign policy, or anyone's foreign policy. These people have to choose whether or not they want to go beyond what happened in 1953, 1979, 1991, 2003, etc. This country, the WORLD, offers immense potential, possibility, and endless prosperity if you want it. If you prefer to hold a grudge and be disruptive and kill people, then there are consequences.

But, americans have got to own-up to the fact that when our government perpetrates murders of innocent people, there will be consequences!
 
The guy that shot-up the club? yes, that is on HIS shoulders. That was his choice. I thought we were discussing the motivation, what it stems from, and the likelihood of others to act-out in the same way. I'm not blaming these individual acts directly on American foreign policy, or anyone's foreign policy. These people have to choose whether or not they want to go beyond what happened in 1953, 1979, 1991, 2003, etc. This country, the WORLD, offers immense potential, possibility, and endless prosperity if you want it. If you prefer to hold a grudge and be disruptive and kill people, then there are consequences.

But, americans have got to own-up to the fact that when our government perpetrates murders of innocent people, there will be consequences!
I can agree with that.
 
To protect ourselves against Radical Islamic Terrorists in our midsts.

you don't think a handgun would do it if he/they aren't armed with that rifle?

Not for you to determine. People deciding for themselves what other people "need" is a devolution into tyranny. Some liberal central planner might one day might wonder what "need" YOU have for something.

i'm not deciding for anyone, just a simple question...and please don't draw parallels to a "need" that i may have.

but since you did, i need to drink chocolate milk after i workout, cool with you?
 
We haven't even begun to fight them. We could virtually wipe them out but our armed forces aren't even allowed to engage until fired upon first. We spend our time worrying about civilians who are probably sympathetic to them any way.
The USA can't win a war that is controlled by cesspool politicians in Wash., DC. This is why we need to elect Trump. He won't micromanage the war. Right now the muslims are the only ones waging war. The USA is just playing at it. Silly libs are convinced that if we just love them enough they will love us back and will stop killing us.
Muslims civilians, most of them anyway, probably giggled and applauded what happened in Orlando.
What if these idiots had a nuclear weapon? They wouldn't hesitate to use it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeelFan58
Strum, my money is on they won't answer that one. They cannot even imagine it because they're too busy pounding their chests!! We are wasting our time trying to illustrate what doing things different might bring. They don't want peace because they see peaceful as weak, when in fact, it's the opposite. Fighters are weak... Weak minded, weak spirited. You can't change their minds and you certainly can't get them to at the very least open them.
Fighters are weak? Just wow.
Easily said from behind your keyboard in the air conditioning and high speed internet.
There are many thousands of Marines, Rangers, and Seals that would most strenuously disagree with you, and would resent the manner in which you easily dismiss their many sacrifices to maintain the freedoms you so blithely enjoy.
 
Fighters are weak? Just wow.
Easily said from behind your keyboard in the air conditioning and high speed internet.
There are many thousands of Marines, Rangers, and Seals that would most strenuously disagree with you, and would resent the manner in which you easily dismiss their many sacrifices to maintain the freedoms you so blithely enjoy.
the sad thing is chick is just so enamored of strum's ridiculous azz philosophical shat and follows behind him like a little puppy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Louigi
you don't think a handgun would do it if he/they aren't armed with that rifle?



i'm not deciding for anyone, just a simple question...and please don't draw parallels to a "need" that i may have.

but since you did, i need to drink chocolate milk after i workout, cool with you?
Mos def. Choc on.
The need rests with the individual. Kind of like beauty being in the eye of the beholder.
 
you don't think a handgun would do it if he/they aren't armed with that rifle?



i'm not deciding for anyone, just a simple question...and please don't draw parallels to a "need" that i may have.

but since you did, i need to drink chocolate milk after i workout, cool with you?
I think we will eventually have to consider the possibility that we will be engaged in a war with Radical Islamic Terrorist from city to city, block to block, house to house... Sad, but it seems that is where we are heading, and I want the good guys to have the means to win.
 
Ahhh.

I don't advocate banning the rifles. I don't think the weapons are the culprit. I also don't wanna see another illegal market for firearms that exists for drugs.

Banning the rifles wouldn't do any good. Its just a semi-automatic rifle in a tactical casing. It isn't even close to a military grade assault rifle. No burst, or fully automatic firing, and it fires a .223 round which is not really designed for killing anything larger than a coyote. A lot of the people who were injured but survived in the shooting would probably be dead if he had been firing a larger round. They're also not easily concealed, unlike handguns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hark_The_Sound_2010
cause we all know muslims just love homos

Yeah and so do christians...

44223b51f44d94d85bb0617296f5-are-there-any-secular-arguments-against-gay-marriage.jpg
 
he could be gay...don't be shocked

and that's bs you're spinning about the ar15...it's an assault rifle for f sake...you guys know it.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT