according to some posters on this board what's good for clemson is good for the ACC and since carolina is in the ACC what's good for clemson is therefore good for carolina. well, nothing i've read has changed my opinion that a clemson dynasty is NOT good for UNC.
ACC football requires - if it is to be taken seriously - large numbers of highly sought after recruits and multiple ranked teams, especially teams in the playoffs and winning bowls. Would it make it easier for UNC football to recruit NC and border states if the top 7 in the ACC every year were UNC, FSU, Miami, BC, Syracuse, Pitt, and Louisville?
Probably so (as long as Tenn, SoCar, UGa and other SEC schools do not hit NC, VA, SC, and GA hard). But would it mean anything good long term in the national picture? Probably not.
Top players do not prefer to play nobody. Top players do not flock to Bama simply because it wins and has a 100,000 seat stadium. They flock to Bama for those reasons and because the SEC competition is top rate, and that is true because other SEC schools also recruit well. Bama does not recruit better when all its in-state and border state conference foes fail on the recruiting trail.
Would it make it easier for UT to recruit really well and rebuild if Bama, Auburn, Georgia, Florida, and LSU were all down in recruiting? Yep - and all those programs down at the same time would lower the national respect for SEC football, meaning any Vols rise would be something less than nationally compelling.
ACC football has only 2 large football fan bases: Clemson and FSU. We
require, in order to have maximum national respect, both to be good every year. In fact, we all but require one of that pair to win the Atlantic every year.
I hope Clemson and FSU both keep up the top recruiting. Our staff can and will sell that to recruits, that they can be part of beating those ACC giants.